U.S. Plans Drive to Limit Salt in Foods -- Welcome to the nanny state!

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,181
18,839
146
But wait!!! When I posted about limits and bans on salt before, I was told by the forum "progressives" that there was no slippery slope and that was just a stupid idea by a CA house member.

But it wasn't...

Welcome to the nanny state folks. Don't bother taking care of yourself, We'll do it for you.

U.S. Plans Drive to Limit Salt in Foods

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Reuters

U.S. regulators are planning a push to gradually cut the amount of salt Americans consume, saying less sodium would reduce deaths from hypertension and heart disease, The Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

The effort would eventually lead to the first legal limits on the amount of salt allowed in processed foods, the newspaper reported. The plan is to be launched this year but officials have not set salt limits.

The government plans to work with the food industry and health experts to reduce sodium gradually over a period of years to ratchet down sodium consumption, the newspaper said, citing U.S. Food and Drug Administration sources.

U.S. researchers said in a recent study that working with the food industry to cut salt intake by nearly 10 percent could prevent hundreds of thousands of heart attacks and strokes over several decades and save the U.S. government $32 billion in healthcare costs.

Eating too much salt is a major cause of high blood pressure, which the Institute of Medicine, one of the National Academies of Sciences, last week declared a "neglected disease" that costs the U.S. health system $73 billion a year.

The FDA, which regulates most processed foods, and the U.S. Agriculture Department, which oversees meat and poultry, will work together on the effort to reduce Americans' sodium consumption.

Manufacturers can now use as much salt as they like in products but they are required to report the amount on nutrition labels.

Many food makers have already begun to cut salt content.

In March, PepsiCo Inc, which owns the Pepsi, Frito-Lay and Quaker brands, announced that it plans a reduction of 25 percent in the average sodium per serving in major global food brands in key markets by 2015.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
And that's bad why? It sure doesn't stop anybody from adding salt to their food.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,850
4,953
136
But wait!!! When I posted about limits and bans on salt before, I was told by the forum "progressives" that there was no slippery slope and that was just a stupid idea by a CA house member.

But it wasn't...

Welcome to the nanny state folks. Don't bother taking care of yourself, We'll do it for you.

U.S. Plans Drive to Limit Salt in Foods

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Reuters

U.S. regulators are planning a push to gradually cut the amount of salt Americans consume, saying less sodium would reduce deaths from hypertension and heart disease, The Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

The effort would eventually lead to the first legal limits on the amount of salt allowed in processed foods, the newspaper reported. The plan is to be launched this year but officials have not set salt limits.

The government plans to work with the food industry and health experts to reduce sodium gradually over a period of years to ratchet down sodium consumption, the newspaper said, citing U.S. Food and Drug Administration sources.

U.S. researchers said in a recent study that working with the food industry to cut salt intake by nearly 10 percent could prevent hundreds of thousands of heart attacks and strokes over several decades and save the U.S. government $32 billion in healthcare costs.

Eating too much salt is a major cause of high blood pressure, which the Institute of Medicine, one of the National Academies of Sciences, last week declared a "neglected disease" that costs the U.S. health system $73 billion a year.

The FDA, which regulates most processed foods, and the U.S. Agriculture Department, which oversees meat and poultry, will work together on the effort to reduce Americans' sodium consumption.

Manufacturers can now use as much salt as they like in products but they are required to report the amount on nutrition labels.

Many food makers have already begun to cut salt content.

In March, PepsiCo Inc, which owns the Pepsi, Frito-Lay and Quaker brands, announced that it plans a reduction of 25 percent in the average sodium per serving in major global food brands in key markets by 2015.

How about you just add more salt to your own food if you need it so badly?

Then everyone lives.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
I'd rather they start with something like regulations requiring real sugar to be used instead of corn syrup.

But yeah....you want more salt? Then add it yourself. Some things just aren't worth getting upset over.

Now if they try to limit my bourbon and rum intake...that's when we'll have a problem!
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
If you really need to have more salt there is nobody stopping you from adding it yourself.

And that's bad why? It sure doesn't stop anybody from adding salt to their food.

How about you just add more salt to your own food if you need it so badly?

Then everyone lives.

And here you see exactly how tyranny creeps in. Who cares the government mandating "x" is only for the good and you folks that oppose it can just deal with it. Did it ever occur to any of you that you could take the responsibility for limiting the amount of salt you take in by choosing the foods you eat without any government involvement in the decision?
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
And here you see exactly how tyranny creeps in. Who cares the government mandating "x" is only for the good and you folks that oppose it can just deal with it. Did it ever occur to any of you that you could take the responsibility for limiting the amount of salt you take in by choosing the foods you eat without any government involvement in the decision?
So Government regulations about the amount of rodent droppings that areallowed in food sold to the public is also a form of Tyranny?
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
So Government regulations about the amount of rodent droppings that areallowed in food sold to the public is also a form of Tyranny?

Well how else do you think a multitude of the people here got so full of shit?
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
And here you see exactly how tyranny creeps in. Who cares the government mandating "x" is only for the good and you folks that oppose it can just deal with it. Did it ever occur to any of you that you could take the responsibility for limiting the amount of salt you take in by choosing the foods you eat without any government involvement in the decision?

I got news for you....you can't fight the movement towards more government in our lives. Just going to be a fact of living here. Sure it might not be ideal, but it is what it is. Honestly there are more things to be worried about that the "tyranny" of sodium limits.

Maybe I'm just getting old and tired...I dunno.
 

Slick5150

Diamond Member
Nov 10, 2001
8,760
3
81
Government should have butted out when they found arsenic in the drinking water around here too! Who are they to tell people how much arsenic is good for them?!

(this thread is full of facepalm)
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
ANANDTECH.COM~ circa 1970s
TITLE: U.S. to require all vehicles to have seatbelts-- Welcome to the nanny state!

ANANDTECH.COM~ circa 1950s
TITLE: U.S. to require all schools to have bomb shelter-- Welcome to the nanny state!

ANANDTECH.COM~ circa 1920s
TITLE: U.S. to require all states to give women the right to vote-- Welcome to the nanny state!

ANANDTECH.COM~ circa 1880s
TITLE: U.S. to require 40 hour work week-- Welcome to the nanny state!

ANANDTECH.COM~ circa 1790s
TITLE: U.S. to require all states in Union to have one currency-- Welcome to the nanny state!

I swear, this shit doesn't get old.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,181
18,839
146
The funny thing is that some of the very same people rationalizing this and trying so vainly to ridicule those who oppose it claimed NO slippery slope in previous arguments about such laws.

With each step, the government limits and controls more of your life. And you rationalize each step without seeing the larger picture.

You see no line being crossed because the only line you have is for yourself.

You say "sure, the government can dictate how much salt and fat is in my food, but damn them if they try to tell me who I can sleep with or if I can have an abortion!!!"

And I ask, what is the difference???

Many of you rally againt the war on drugs... yet support limits on food ingredients.

And I ask, what's the difference???
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
The funny thing is that some of the very same people rationalizing this and trying so vainly to ridicule those who oppose it claimed NO slippery slope in previous arguments about such laws.

With each step, the government limits and controls more of your life. And you rationalize each step without seeing the larger picture.

You see no line being crossed because the only line you have is for yourself.

You say "sure, the government can dictate how much salt and fat is in my food, but damn them if they try to tell me who I can sleep with or if I can have an abortion!!!"

And I ask, what is the difference???

Many of you rally againt the war on drugs... yet support limits on food ingredients.

And I ask, what's the difference???

Thank you for your generalizations. Now go back to work.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
The funny thing is that some of the very same people rationalizing this and trying so vainly to ridicule those who oppose it claimed NO slippery slope in previous arguments about such laws.

With each step, the government limits and controls more of your life. And you rationalize each step without seeing the larger picture.

You see no line being crossed because the only line you have is for yourself.

You say "sure, the government can dictate how much salt and fat is in my food, but damn them if they try to tell me who I can sleep with or if I can have an abortion!!!"

And I ask, what is the difference???

Many of you rally againt the war on drugs... yet support limits on food ingredients.

And I ask, what's the difference???
Regulating the food industry to limit an ingredient that adds to their profit at the cost of the consumer's health is vastly different. On the other hand if the Government were to mandate that an individual was prohibited from adding salt (or fat) to their meal to enhance the taste or basically any reason you might have a point.
 
Last edited:
Feb 16, 2005
14,077
5,447
136
I suggest having one of those new kfc chicken bacon cardio burgers, add a few tablespoons of salt, have some potato wedges, and a nice bloody mary and get REALLY worked up about this nanny state you're imagining.
It does an aortic valve good.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Actually, government is the very reason we have this problem. Shocking, isn't?

The metric system is the tool of the devil! My car gets forty rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it!

or something like that....
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,850
4,953
136
The funny thing is that some of the very same people rationalizing this and trying so vainly to ridicule those who oppose it claimed NO slippery slope in previous arguments about such laws.

With each step, the government limits and controls more of your life. And you rationalize each step without seeing the larger picture.

You see no line being crossed because the only line you have is for yourself.

You say "sure, the government can dictate how much salt and fat is in my food, but damn them if they try to tell me who I can sleep with or if I can have an abortion!!!"

And I ask, what is the difference???

Many of you rally againt the war on drugs... yet support limits on food ingredients.

And I ask, what's the difference???




You really don't know, do you?
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Utopia is being legislated before our very eyes. Now the trick is making people like their inescapable social destiny. Community, Identity, Stability!!!