U.S. Citizen Pleads Guilty in Oil-For-Food Scam

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
It's hard to believe the U.S., a permanent Security Council member (the Security Council managed the Oil for Food program BTW) had no idea the shenanigans were going on until it was politically opportune for them to use the info to attack the UN and Kofi Annan. Now we find a U.S. citizen, an expat Iraqi, has plead guilty in the scam.

I wonder how many more of the expat Iraqis in America made a killing off of Oil for Food???

Ahmed Chalabi? His murdering cousin Allawi? The "usual suspects" the U.S. depended on for information on the conditions in Iraq which the Bush administration used in deciding to invade?

U.S. Citizen Pleads Guilty in Oil-For-Food Scam

By Deborah Charles

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An Iraqi-American illegally acted as an agent for Iraq under Saddam Hussein and received millions of dollars worth of oil from the country's U.N. oil-for-food program, U.S. court documents showed on Tuesday.

Samir Vincent, 64, a naturalized American citizen, pleaded guilty to four charges as part of a plea deal with the government, which is investigating whether U.S. laws were violated in the $64 billion oil-for-food program.

According to documents filed in the U.S. District Court in New York, Vincent pleaded guilty to conspiring and acting as an unregistered agent of a foreign government, violating economic sanctions and income tax fraud violations.

Vincent, who surrendered to the FBI on Tuesday morning in New York, faces a maximum of 28 years in prison, which could be reduced for cooperation. He also agreed to cooperate with the investigation by the U.S. Justice Department into corruption in the oil-for-food program.

Under the program, which began in December 1996 and ended in November 2003, the former Iraqi president's government was allowed to sell oil to buy civilian goods to ease the impact of U.N. sanctions on ordinary Iraqis.

The plea agreement represented the first case brought as part of the U.S. government's investigation into the scandal.

"Between 1996 and 2003, Vincent has admitted to receiving allocations for more than 9 million barrels of oil, the rights to which he sold for millions of dollars," U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft said in announcing the plea deal.

U.S. Attorney David Kelley said Vincent reaped between $3 million and $5 million from the allocation of the oil and from payments from the Iraqi government.

ACTED ON BEHALF OF IRAQ

Vincent admitted his ties to Saddam's regime began before the oil-for-food program was launched.

"For a number of years, I acted on behalf of the government of Iraq in seeking to open a dialogue with the United States and the United Nations with the ultimate goal of lifting the sanctions against Iraq," Vincent said when he appeared before U.S. District Judge Denny Chin in New York.

A sentencing hearing was tentatively set for late March.

Ashcroft called Vincent one of the "accomplices" in corrupting the oil-for-food program.

"Under the oil-for-food program, officials at the highest levels of the Iraqi regime had the power to select the companies and individuals who received the rights to purchase Iraqi oil," Ashcroft said.

"These companies and individuals, many of whom were not otherwise involved in the oil industry, made large profits by selling their allocations of Iraqi oil to brokers or companies capable of transporting the oil to a refinery," he added.

Since the overthrow of the Saddam government, Iraq has released lists of oil vouchers and kickbacks by the previous government. The lists detail legitimate contracts to oil companies but they are also a veritable who's who of political groups and individuals from whom the former Iraqi government wanted to buy influence while under U.N. sanctions.

Charles Duelfer, a former U.N. arms inspector who did a detailed survey last fall, said Saddam earned $1.5 billion through kickbacks from contracts for goods purchased through the oil-for-food program and $229,000 from surcharges on oil sold under the program.

Duelfer estimated Iraq also sold $8 billion in oil outside of the program: $4.4 billion in trade with Jordan, $2.8 billion with Syria and $710 million with Turkey, which was known to U.N. Security Council members, including the United States.

(Additional reporting by James Vicini, Gail Appleson and the United Nations bureau)

 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Ask why I'm not surprised that the subject of UNSCAM was kryptonite to the usual suspects until an Iraqi-American was found to be involved?

Go ahead. Ask.
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Why sre you not surprised that the subject of UNSCAM was kryptonite to the usual suspects until an Iraqi-American was found to be involved?
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: Gaard
Why sre you not surprised that the subject of UNSCAM was kryptonite to the usual suspects until an Iraqi-American was found to be involved?
Glad you asked.

It was because those usual subjects don't seem to care about anything unless they can indict the US in some way, shape, or form and tell us all what bad little boyz we all are. It's not a real scandal unless Americans are involved. The rest of the world, whose opinion of us they seem to hold so dearly, gets a free pass to screw anybody in any way they wish.

Of course they won't see the hypocrisy in that stance. But it's there, laying spread-legged for all to ogle. It's a lovely sort of political porn that's evident not only in this forum, but in others like it as well that have an overabundance of left leaners.

I guess I should be used to that, or adapt to the fact that will happen. But then I have to be complacent about those with an agenda and that's just not the liberal way now, is it?
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
The true hypocrisy is in the stance of the Bush administration on this. The UN Security Council controlled the oil for food program. The USA is a permanent member of the Security Council. The USA was aware of the illegal dealings in oil for food but did nothing about it waiting, rather, until they could use the information they refused to act on from a program they largely controlled to attack Kofi Annan because he told the Bush administration their unprovoked attack on Iraq was illegal.

It's just the typical run of the mill daily payback drill from the Bush administration. It's their MO. If you step out of the party line they attackyou for being disloyal. Even if your charges are true. Truth doesn't matter to these people, only winning matters.

And that's why the USA is in the shape it's in today...



 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: BBond
The true hypocrisy is in the stance of the Bush administration on this. The UN Security Council controlled the oil for food program. The USA is a permanent member of the Security Council. The USA was aware of the illegal dealings in oil for food but did nothing about it waiting, rather, until they could use the information they refused to act on from a program they largely controlled to attack Kofi Annan because he told the Bush administration their unprovoked attack on Iraq was illegal.
That's called leverage. I'm sure you're not naive enough to believe that everyone doesn't do this sort of thing?

As far as the UN, you do know they legitimized the occupation, right? Which follows that they indirectly legitimized the invasion.

It's just the typical run of the mill daily payback drill from the Bush administration. It's their MO. If you step out of the party line they attackyou for being disloyal. Even if your charges are true. Truth doesn't matter to these people, only winning matters.

And that's why the USA is in the shape it's in today...
Folks like you stay out of line with guns drawn, just waiting for a chance to squeeze the trigger.

Only winning matters? It would seem only whining matters.