• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

U.N. : No weapons of mass destruction found

Bluga

Banned
Inspectors present mixed report
Security Council remains divided

UNITED NATIONS (CNN) --The United Nations Security Council appeared to remain divided over Iraq Friday, following a crucial report from the top U.N. weapons inspectors, who said they had not found any weapons of mass destruction during their search in Iraq

Hans Blix, executive chairman of the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission, and Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency told the council that they were still investigating and had not ruled out the possibility that Iraq does possess chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.

After the presentations, the members of the council appeared to be maintaining their positions -- with France China and Russia calling for more time, while the United States, Britain and Spain said Iraq was not complying with U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441.

French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin said that it was clear that inspections were working and that there was not yet any justification for using force against Iraq. (Speakers following Blix and ElBaradei)

"Inspections are producing results. ... The option of inspections has not been taken to the end," de Villepin said. "The use of force would be so fraught with risk for people, for the region and for international stability that it should only be envisioned as a last resort."

Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan also called for more time.

However, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said that the progress that Blix and ElBaradei had reported was simply process and not substance.

"These are all tricks that are being played on us," Powell said.

Progress reported, but questions remain
Blix said perhaps the most important problem facing the council is determining what happened to stores of anthrax, deadly VX nerve agent, and long-range missiles that Iraq previously was known to have. Iraq has not provided adequate material to prove what happened to them, he said.

It is Baghdad's responsibility, "not the task of inspectors," to find such evidence, he said.

Blix said one document suggests that "some 1,000 tons of chemical agent were unaccounted for.

"Another matter, and one of great significance, is that many proscribed weapons and items are not accounted for," Blix said. "One must not jump to the conclusion that they exist. However, that possibility is also not excluded. If they exist, they should be presented for destruction."

He said that Iraq's al-Samoud 2 missile exceeded the range of 93 miles (150 kilometers) allowed by U.N. resolutions. Iraqi officials have said the missile did not yet have a guidance system, which would reduce its range.

Iraqi cooperation "will speed up the process," ElBaradei said, although it is possible to complete inspections without cooperation.

ElBaradei stopped short of saying Iraq was not currently cooperating.

He said that Iraq has provided immediate access to all inspection locations and that four Iraqi scientists have been interviewed in private.

Blix said he had seen no evidence that Iraq had advance knowledge of the inspectors' plans.

Blix also said that the satellite photographs of a declared site Powell presented to the council last week could have shown routine activity, rather than the movement of illicit materials.

He also said that screening on chemical and biological samples taken from suspected sights has been consistent with Iraq's declaration.

Iraqi presidential decree
Iraq's National Assembly also held what it called an "extraordinary session" Friday ahead of the report, Iraqi officials said.

Before that meeting, Saddam issued a decree banning weapons of mass destruction. (Full story)

The decree prohibits nongovernment importation and production of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons.

Inspectors have not had an opportunity to study that decree, Blix said. But ElBaradei called it a "step in the right direction."

The United States said it places no value on Saddam's decree.

The United States and Britain are preparing a new Security Council resolution that, in the words of one U.S. official involved in the discussions, makes it clear "the time has come to enforce [Resolution] 1441." The exact language is being hammered out between Washington and London.

While a slim chance exists the new resolution could be presented Friday, it is more likely to be introduced early next week, the official said.

For more on latest developments, see CNN.com's Iraq Tracker.



 
UNITED NATIONS, Feb. 14 ? In a pivotal report to the Security Council, U.N. arms inspectors on Friday said that no weapons of mass destruction had been uncovered in more than 400 inspections in Iraq and cast doubt on U.S. intelligence indicating that Baghdad removed banned weapons and materials shortly before inspectors arrived at suspect sites. But they also said that Iraq had not accounted for large quantities of prohibited materials and possesses a missile that violates limits established by the United Nations.


THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION had hoped that the report by chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix and U.N. nuclear agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei would bolster its argument that Iraq is attempting to foil weapons inspections, but the inspectors provided no immediate justification for military action against Iraq.
Foes of the use of force seized on the report to press their call for continued inspections. French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin said the report shows U.N. inspections in Iraq ?are producing results? and called for March 14 meeting to hear another progress report on the inspections.
His address was greeted with applause, rare for Security Council speeches.
Discussing weapons of mass destruction that the Bush administration says Iraqi President Saddam Hussein is harboring, Blix said the inspectors have ?not found any such weapons, only a small number of empty chemical munitions, which should have been declared and destroyed.?
But he added that many proscribed weapons ?are not accounted for.?

Full transcript of Blix's remarks

?One must not jump to the conclusion that they exist,? he said, ?however, that possibility is also not excluded. If they exist, they should be presented for destruction. If they do not exist, credible evidence to that effect should be presented.?


fact file
Broad range of views
The United States: Iraq is developing weapons of mass destruction, is failing to cooperate with weapons inspectors and is violating its obligations under U.N resolutions. Washington says it already has Security Council authorization to use military force to disarm Iraq.

Russia: Iraq is cooperating with inspectors and there is no evidence it is rearming. Russia wants economic sanctions, imposed after Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, to eventually be lifted and says the council must authorize any use of force.

China: Supports continued inspections.
Britain: Prefers a second Security Council resolution authorizing any military action, but is expected to join U.S.-led action without one. Says Iraq is not cooperating or disarming and that time is running out for it to do so through weapons inspections.

France: Says inspections are starting to work and sees no justification for military action now. Paris has hinted it could use its veto to block council authorization for military action at this stage.
Angola: Supports continued inspections in Iraq.
Bulgaria: Indicated it would support U.S.-led military intervention without a Security Council authorization.
Cameroon: Supports continued inspections and has not taken a position regarding military action.
Chile: Supports continued inspections and has not taken a position regarding military action.
Guinea: Supports continued inspections and has not taken a position regarding military action.
Germany: Insists Iraq must be disarmed peacefully and has said it will not participate in any military intervention, even if the Security Council authorizes such action.
Mexico: Supports continued weapons inspections and could support military intervention authorized by the Security Council.
Pakistan: Supports continued weapons inspections and a diplomatic resolution of the conflict.
Syria: Damascus says Iraq is cooperating with its obligations under U.N. resolutions and has called for U.N. sanctions to be lifted.
Spain: Supports the Bush administration?s stance on Iraq. Believes military intervention could proceed without Security Council authorization.


Last updated: Feb. 4, 2003
Source: The Associated Press
Printable version


BLIX SAYS U.S. ASSERTIONS UNPROVEN
Blix said that assertions made last week by U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell that Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction had not been supported by subsequent inspections.
Pointing to one case Powell highlighted using satellite photos of a munitions depot, Blix said: ?The reported movement of munitions at the site could just as easily have been a routine activity? as one designed to hide banned materials before inspections.
Advertisement




He also took issue with Powell?s suggestion that Iraq was receiving advance notice of U.N. inspections.
?In no case have we seen convincing evidence that the Iraqi side knew in advance that the inspectors were coming,? Blix asserted.
Blix did report that findings by a panel of experts found that one of Iraq?s new missile systems exceeds the range limit set by Security Council resolutions.
?The experts concluded that, based on the data provided by Iraq, the two declared variants of the Al Samoud 2 missile were capable of exceeding 150 kilometers (93 miles) in range. This missile system is therefore proscribed for Iraq,? he said.
But he did not indicate that the finding proves that Iraq is seeking to thwart the inspections, as Washington had hoped, nor did he call for their immediate destruction.
On a second missile, the al-Fatah, Blix said his experts needed more information before deciding if it violated U.N. range limits.

EXPANDED NUCLEAR INSPECTIONS PLANNED
Following Blix?s report on the results of 11 weeks of inspections, ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the council that he would expand the number of inspectors working in Iraq and at offices in Vienna in order to determine whether Iraq has revived its nuclear capabilities.


He also said inspectors do not need Iraq?s full cooperation to complete their work.
?The IAEA?s experience in nuclear verification shows that it is possible, particularly with an intrusive verification system, to assess the presence or absence of a nuclear weapons program in a state even without the full co-operation of the inspected state.
Both Blix and ElBaradei said private interviews with Iraqi scientists had proved informative, though ElBaradei noted that the four scientists interviewed privately by his team had insisted on recording the sessions.
Blix also said that since three interviews were conducted by his team in Baghdad on Feb. 8-9, no more private sessions had been arranged.
?I hope this will change,? he said. ?We feel that interviews conducted without any third party present and without tape recording would provide the greatest credibility.?
Under intense pressure, Iraq agreed earlier this month to prod its scientists to agree to private interviews. Previously, all scientists insisted on being accompanied by an Iraqi official or having their interview tape recorded.

A ?MIXED BAG?
The report was characterized in advance as a ?mixed bag? by one Bush administration official and was not expected to resolve the deep divisions between the United States and other Security Council members over whether inspections should continue or whether the council should begin debate on a new resolution authorizing military force against Iraq.


Both sides in the high-stakes debate were expected to seize on portions of the report to justify their positions, setting the stage for a showdown in the coming days in the badly divided Security Council.
Germany, which with France is pushing for more time for weapons inspections, indicated that the report will show that significant progress is being made.
?Based on everything we know, I think that the report will point towards an extension of the work of the inspectors,? Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer told German journalists before the meeting.
The Bush administration, however, is prepared to argue that the report demonstrates that Saddam has failed to disarm.
The New York Times on Friday quoted unidentified senior administration officials as saying that administration officials have already begun drafting a new U.N. resolution that will state that Baghdad failed to take advantage of a final opportunity to disarm and now must face ?serious consequences.? The resolution, whish is expected to be presented to the Security Council next week, makes no specific reference to military action, although that is clearly the intent, the newspaper said.
ElBaradei said late Thursday that he does not consider war a foregone conclusion provided ?we see some progress on the part of Iraq? in revealing any hidden weapons of mass destruction.

SADDAM MAKES WEAPONS DECREE
Seeking to bolster that perception, Saddam on Friday issued a presidential decree banning the importation or production of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, or any materials that could be used to make them.
?All ministries should implement this decree and take whatever measures are necessary and punish people who do not adhere to it,? said the order, apparently issued in response to repeated U.N. demands that Baghdad outlaw weapons of mass destruction.
The comments from the 15 members of the Security Council clearly draw the lines for debate in the coming days.
Powell has called the report and council?s decision on the next step in the months-long Iraq crisis a ?moment of truth? for the United Nations.
President Bush, who maintains that Saddam means to foil the inspections process, issued a challenge to the international body: The council ?can now decide whether or not it has the resolve to enforce its resolutions,? he said Thursday.
Rallying troops, Bush said he was confident they were ready to win a potential war with Iraq and urged the United Nations to ensure its credibility by enforcing demands that Saddam disarm.
If war comes, ?America will act deliberately, America will act decisively and America will act victoriously with the world?s greatest military,? Bush said at the naval base near Jacksonville, Fla.
Though the rift with Security Council members France and Germany showed no signs of easing, Bush said he was optimistic that ?free nations will show backbone and courage.?

MISSILE FINDING
A key factor in the eventual decision on whether to authorize force will be the finding this week that Iraq?s al-Samoud 2 missile has a greater operational range than is permissible under U.N. resolutions.



Feb. 14 ? Pope John Paul II shakes hands with Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz prior to their private audience at the Vatican. NBC?s Keith Miller reports.



U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte and Russia?s Deputy Foreign Minister Yuri Fedotov said U.N. experts found that the al-Samoud 2 missile went more than 20 miles beyond the 93-mile limit. But this conclusion was not final, according to Fedotov, who argued that the finding shows inspections are working and Iraq is cooperating, since it reported the missile systems.
Council diplomats said the experts recommended that inspectors ask the Iraqis for more technical information about the al-Fatah missile system, which also could exceed the limit.
Powell characterized the finding as ?a serious matter.?
If Blix confirms the report, ?It shows continued Iraqi non-compliance,? Powell told the House Budget Committee on Thursday.
But Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz said the missiles ?are still within limits that are decided by the United Nations.?
Aziz said the missiles were short-range and do not have a guidance system. Without the weight of a guidance system, a missile may fly as far as 10 miles beyond its normal range, he told reporters as he arrived in Rome on Thursday. ?That is not very dangerous.?
Aziz was meeting with Pope John Paul II at the Vatican Friday. The pontiff has been a staunch critic of possible war on Iraq.
Aziz, a Christian, assured the pope Iraq would cooperate over disarmament, the Vatican said. The pope said Iraq had to ?faithfully respect? U.N. resolutions and international law.
What's behind Europe's objections?

FRENCH PROPOSAL: EXPAND INSPECTIONS
The alternative to the resolution authorizing military force against Iraq is a French proposal ? with support from Russia, Germany, Mexico and several other Security Council members ? that calls for tripling the number of U.N. inspectors to make inspections more targeted and intrusive.
The Bush administration has dismissed the idea, saying that Iraq has proven time and time again that it can foil the inspections by hiding the weapons of mass destruction that Washington insists it possesses.



A new poll indicates President Bush has convinced a majority of Americans about the need for military action against Iraq, but most want more time for United Nations and building of a broad alliance.
The CBS-New York Times poll released Friday showed that general support for military action against Iraq is strong, 66 percent. But various Iraq questions get sharply different results - a sign of the mixed feelings that people have about going to war.
While most support military action, they aren?t that convinced that something needs to be done immediately. Six in 10, 63 percent, said they preferred waiting for allies, while 32 percent said it?s important to take action even without allies. Another recent poll, by ABC-Washington Post, indicated that a majority support acting with some allies.
The CBS-Times poll had an error margin of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

NEW RESOLUTION?



Feb. 13 ? NBC?s Tom Brokaw spoke with Britain?s Foreign Minister Jack Straw about Friday?s U.N. Security Council session.



Britain, the strongest international backer of a tough U.S. line against Iraq, said Friday it was ?fairly confident? of seeing a second U.N. resolution passed on Iraqi disarmament.
?We are going to wait until we see what Dr. Blix and Dr. ElBaradei say before we make final decisions about tabling a second resolution,? Foreign Secretary Jack Straw told the British Broadcasting Corp.
?We have always said we would much prefer a second resolution if we believe that military action is necessary and appropriate,? Straw said.
Britain has sent 42,000 troops to the gulf to support a buildup of U.S. forces for possible war. Defense officials told NBC News that the total number of American troops in the gulf region was about 140,000, with another 16,000 on ships in the Mediterranean Sea and thousands more on the way.

DEFENDING TURKEY
Adding to the intrigue surrounding Friday?s U.N. session is a bitter dispute among NATO allies. On Thursday, the feuding allies failed to break a deadlock over a U.S. request for support for Turkey in the event of a war. Meanwhile, Turkey?s foreign minister, Yasar Yakis, held talks in Washington on basing U.S. troops in Turkey for use against Iraq.
In a related issue, France, Germany and Belgium have rejected plans to send anti-missile batteries and surveillance aircraft to Turkey, saying such a move would wrongly send a signal that war was inevitable.
Despite repeated hints at an imminent breakthrough on the issue, no announcement of a deal has been forthcoming
 
Sorry, but I listened to Colin Powell's remarks on this and he pretty much slapped down the whole idea of inspectors there to find weapons. They aren't there to hunt around Iraq. They are there to confirm that Iraq has destroyed all previously known WMDs and have Iraq show that they are in FULL compliance with all previous resolutions. Iraq has not done that...end of story.
 
Originally posted by: Queasy
Sorry, but I listened to Colin Powell's remarks on this and he pretty much slapped down the whole idea of inspectors there to find weapons. They aren't there to hunt around Iraq. They are there to confirm that Iraq has destroyed all previously known WMDs and have Iraq show that they are in FULL compliance with all previous resolutions. Iraq has not done that...end of story.
Exactly...
 
Originally posted by: Queasy
Sorry, but I listened to Colin Powell's remarks on this and he pretty much slapped down the whole idea of inspectors there to find weapons. They aren't there to hunt around Iraq. They are there to confirm that Iraq has destroyed all previously known WMDs and have Iraq show that they are in FULL compliance with all previous resolutions. Iraq has not done that...end of story.

except the french don't get it
rolleye.gif
 
Less than 200 inspectors vs an area almost as big as California...... they will have a hard time finding anything.
 
Originally posted by: rufruf44
Less than 200 inspectors vs an area almost as big as California...... they will have a hard time finding anything.

They were never there to find anything. They were there to confirm and assist Iraqi compliance with previous resolutions. Iraq has not done this. End of story.
 
Back
Top