Tyson Foods Drops Labor Day For Muslim Holiday Instead

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Easter and Christmas got stale and over commercialized so time for new holidays anyway.

What kind of presents do you get for Eid al-Fitr?

You get $$$

Really, how much???

EID is like Christmas.

You can get $50 or $500 or $0. You can get a new T.V or you can end up with a toaster.

Cool. Like I said X-mas has gotten stale. Bring on the new holidays.

Always a good idea to send out the old and bring in the new.

Think of all the new marketing stuff that has to be made and purchased,
 

manowar821

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2007
6,063
0
0
Personally, I don't really care about your fears of a specific religion, since you're comfortable with your own being the illegitimate driving force for our society. You cannot rage against a religion that performs exactly as yours. OH WHAT? BLASPHEMY? Blow me, asshole. Yours & islam can both burn.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: JD50


Listen, I'm not going to sit here and argue with you whatever it is that you are trying to argue. If you can't tell the difference between the unbending rules of religion, and the laws made by a Democratic society, then I'm not going to be able to help you here.

Yes, there are a few laws that the majority cannot change, but that does not in any way, shape, or form make a Democratic society like religion. That's like saying that the sky is blue, and a smurf is blue, so a smurf is just like the sky.

I don't argue about religion, so I'm not going down that road with you.

So if the majority argues in favour of religion wouldn't it be democratic to actually listen? It would be the laws made by a democratic society then. And this is not like exact science. Laws are not exact science. Just because you think something is a good law doesn't make it so.

Why is it that religious nutcases can never seem to grasp the idea that what their religious beliefs are between them and their creator/church/holy cow/whatever, that the rest of society should never have to be forced to believe the same thing. I'm against the so-called "blue laws" that Christians introduced in the US as well, it's the same idea: legislating their religion to force others to accept it.

Add me to those boycotting Tyson products, there are plenty of alternatives from companies that are not bending over to the religious nutcases.

Nobody is "legislating" anything, nobody is forcing society to believe anything. My God you people are a bunch of drama queens.

Speaking of drama queens, perhaps you'd learn to read and comprehend before posting? I was responding to TGB's question (which I quoted), not indicating that the incident OP referenced was being legislated. Tyson has a right to listen to whomever they want, just like as a consumer I have a right to avoid companies that I feel are not doing the right thing for the country. My point to TGB was exactly that I don't think this stuff should be legislated, no matter what religion it is.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: JD50


Listen, I'm not going to sit here and argue with you whatever it is that you are trying to argue. If you can't tell the difference between the unbending rules of religion, and the laws made by a Democratic society, then I'm not going to be able to help you here.

Yes, there are a few laws that the majority cannot change, but that does not in any way, shape, or form make a Democratic society like religion. That's like saying that the sky is blue, and a smurf is blue, so a smurf is just like the sky.

I don't argue about religion, so I'm not going down that road with you.

So if the majority argues in favour of religion wouldn't it be democratic to actually listen? It would be the laws made by a democratic society then. And this is not like exact science. Laws are not exact science. Just because you think something is a good law doesn't make it so.

Why is it that religious nutcases can never seem to grasp the idea that what their religious beliefs are between them and their creator/church/holy cow/whatever, that the rest of society should never have to be forced to believe the same thing. I'm against the so-called "blue laws" that Christians introduced in the US as well, it's the same idea: legislating their religion to force others to accept it.

Add me to those boycotting Tyson products, there are plenty of alternatives from companies that are not bending over to the religious nutcases.

Let me know when those Muslims at that plant demand that other non Muslims not eat pork for lunch, or that they must pray as well, or that they demand the women dress differently, or that they don't want Christmas off as a holiday, okay?

Then i'll consider the comparison to "Blue Laws"

magomago, see my post above -- I agree with you completely that this is not the equivalent of blue laws. I was using blue laws as an illustration of getting religious beliefs enacted in legislation, which is usually a bad idea.
 

The Green Bean

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2003
6,506
7
81
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
I think that you fail to realize that the majority should never be allowed to deny the minority of basic universal rights. It seems that you live in a country where the majority is allowed to persecute the minority and that such activity is justified because the mobs wish it so.

Who decides what these "universal rights" are?
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: shinerburke
This is good information to have. I can now mark Tyson products off my grocery list from now on.

I will as well. I wouldn't expect less of Muslims to try and get this through, but it's the Tyson management that agreed to it.

Um, it was majority vote... and such a system would lead to this if most of the people working there are Muslim. Do you expect *anybody* to vote against their preference over another person's in this system?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,154
55,703
136
Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: shinerburke
This is good information to have. I can now mark Tyson products off my grocery list from now on.

I will as well. I wouldn't expect less of Muslims to try and get this through, but it's the Tyson management that agreed to it.

Um, it was majority vote... and such a system would lead to this if most of the people working there are Muslim. Do you expect *anybody* to vote against their preference over another person's in this system?

I cannot believe how retarded this thread is. The majority of workers in a chicken plant wanted to shift their schedule around in a number of days worked neutral way, and Tyson said ok. It does nothing to affect the output of the factory, costs the business nothing, and makes their workers happier.

Tyson would have to be insane to say no to that, or just huge dicks. The best part is that Labor Day is supposed to celebrate the power of workers to change their circumstances for the better, and you guys are going nuts about workers doing just that.

Seek help guys, you're dangerously paranoid.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
I think that you fail to realize that the majority should never be allowed to deny the minority of basic universal rights. It seems that you live in a country where the majority is allowed to persecute the minority and that such activity is justified because the mobs wish it so.

Who decides what these "universal rights" are?

Civilized people.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: eskimospy

Tyson would have to be insane to say no to that, or just huge dicks. The best part is that Labor Day is supposed to celebrate the power of workers to change their circumstances for the better, and you guys are going nuts about workers doing just that.

Seek help guys, you're dangerously paranoid.
Their Texans, it's an inbred trait.
 

DarkThinker

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2007
2,822
0
0
I could see how you could complain about Muslims had they threatened management with violence or extremist ways and I would have backed you up in all honesty...but they used the proper democratic way to vote for what they see fit....so go bang your head against a big brick wall Socio....your racist threads are really getting old and tiresome in here....sheesh what is a Muslim supposed to do in this country? Consult with you every time he pulls a move?
 

Socio

Golden Member
May 19, 2002
1,732
2
81
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Socio

Only if they are forced to assimilate and if anything the exact opposite is happening and will continue to happen because of the spineless left that will gladly help them not have to by accommodating their every whim.

Dude you are being asinine. You either are lying, or you simply don't know any Muslims and their kids to say...so you should shut up about something that you have no idea about. And please, anti Muslim sites online do not count at all.

If anyone knows this better than you, it is going to be me because I AM that generation that grew up and I have my own siblings of various ages and I meet many others from different backgrounds and I can see how they act and think. And you are clearly unaware of the reality around you. Girls who wouldn't shake your hand are fans of Lost and Prison Break and wouldn't miss an episode for the world (And if they did, they'll ask someone to download it online just like all the other good American children who pirate media). Girls who make sure to dress one to two sizes larger are rabid fans of American Idol. Ask them about the cartoons they know, and they will mention what they watched growing up here. Ask them about music, and even if they don't know much they will have heard of the names of hands. Ask them about many traditionally "American" things, and they will know it. Even the guy who walks around with a skull cap quietly likes to air guitar to Linken Park. Many can read and write well considering they are college students.

You know shit about the kids who are grew up here and are still growing up here. They know just as much about the culture here and are just as assimilated as any other American Kid. They maybe a little different because their parents raised them to not date (which often in America isn't just about meeting people - Tom Leykis anyone?), not to drink (which some don't follow anyways), not to eat pork (Jews don't eat pork either so what is the problem?) but that mean they arne't American - every kid is raised up differently and has different values.

It is often hard to describe an entire group in general, but no matter where I've been - whether it is on the West Coast, or in the Middle of the US, or at a conference seeing kids across the country - I have never come across someone who grew up here or is growing up here and is completely NOT assimilated. That is something I state POSITIVELY - because you make it seem like these people AREN'T. You know what though, I'm sure out there, somewhere, there HAS to be a few because many things about humans fall into a bell curve....but it shouldn't be a surprise that they are the super minority. To most, the USA is their home and will continue to be.

I should remind myself to pick up Tyson meat because of common sense they exhibit. Hell, if Christian workers who are religious enough want a room for prayer...turn the existing ones into an interfaith room...of course as the article says, "Lawson said they consider religious accommodations on a case-by-case basis. She said that so far, no one has asked for any other type of religious prayer room."

Maybe some have assimilated, maybe some just say they have, it is very hard to tell because the Quran gives explicit license to Muslims to both lie and deceive with impunity.

I do know that a study being conducted called Mapping Shari'a Project has released preliminary findings that indicate 3 in 4 U.S. mosques preach anti-West extremism which would of course lend itself to deception of assimilation to the West rather than the actual assimilation.

There is also the fact Muslims in the U.S., as they are in Western Europe and other countries, are a self-segregating which creates an unintegrable population whose collectivist beliefs are fundamentally opposed to American values of democratic government and individual freedoms. This also lends itself to deception of assimilation to the West rather than the actual assimilation.

It is also not hard to see what happens if assimilation is not forced and Islam has a virtually free reign.

Here is an example;

'UK faces threat from British Muslims (insurgents) returning from Afghan'

LONDON: The UK faces serious security threat from British Muslim extremists returning from Afghanistan after fighting alongside Taliban, a top British commander has said.

British Muslims are part of the Taliban militia fighting against UK security forces in Afghanistan

British Muslims going to Afghanistan to train for and kill British soldiers then head back to Britain to spread their hate, training, and likely commit attacks.
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: Socio
...
It is also not hard to see what happens if assimilation is not forced and Islam has a virtually free reign.
...
How did you slip by being forced to assimilate into the human race?
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: JD50


Listen, I'm not going to sit here and argue with you whatever it is that you are trying to argue. If you can't tell the difference between the unbending rules of religion, and the laws made by a Democratic society, then I'm not going to be able to help you here.

Yes, there are a few laws that the majority cannot change, but that does not in any way, shape, or form make a Democratic society like religion. That's like saying that the sky is blue, and a smurf is blue, so a smurf is just like the sky.

I don't argue about religion, so I'm not going down that road with you.

So if the majority argues in favour of religion wouldn't it be democratic to actually listen? It would be the laws made by a democratic society then. And this is not like exact science. Laws are not exact science. Just because you think something is a good law doesn't make it so.

Why is it that religious nutcases can never seem to grasp the idea that what their religious beliefs are between them and their creator/church/holy cow/whatever, that the rest of society should never have to be forced to believe the same thing. I'm against the so-called "blue laws" that Christians introduced in the US as well, it's the same idea: legislating their religion to force others to accept it.

Add me to those boycotting Tyson products, there are plenty of alternatives from companies that are not bending over to the religious nutcases.

Nobody is "legislating" anything, nobody is forcing society to believe anything. My God you people are a bunch of drama queens.

Speaking of drama queens, perhaps you'd learn to read and comprehend before posting? I was responding to TGB's question (which I quoted), not indicating that the incident OP referenced was being legislated. Tyson has a right to listen to whomever they want, just like as a consumer I have a right to avoid companies that I feel are not doing the right thing for the country. My point to TGB was exactly that I don't think this stuff should be legislated, no matter what religion it is.

I think I comprehend just fine. You talked about boycotting Tyson because they are "bending over to the religious nutcases" in a post where you're complaining about folks legislating their religion and forcing other to believe in it. If you meant something else, it's not at all obvious to me what that might have been.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: JD50


Listen, I'm not going to sit here and argue with you whatever it is that you are trying to argue. If you can't tell the difference between the unbending rules of religion, and the laws made by a Democratic society, then I'm not going to be able to help you here.

Yes, there are a few laws that the majority cannot change, but that does not in any way, shape, or form make a Democratic society like religion. That's like saying that the sky is blue, and a smurf is blue, so a smurf is just like the sky.

I don't argue about religion, so I'm not going down that road with you.

So if the majority argues in favour of religion wouldn't it be democratic to actually listen? It would be the laws made by a democratic society then. And this is not like exact science. Laws are not exact science. Just because you think something is a good law doesn't make it so.

Why is it that religious nutcases can never seem to grasp the idea that what their religious beliefs are between them and their creator/church/holy cow/whatever, that the rest of society should never have to be forced to believe the same thing. I'm against the so-called "blue laws" that Christians introduced in the US as well, it's the same idea: legislating their religion to force others to accept it.

Add me to those boycotting Tyson products, there are plenty of alternatives from companies that are not bending over to the religious nutcases.

Nobody is "legislating" anything, nobody is forcing society to believe anything. My God you people are a bunch of drama queens.

Speaking of drama queens, perhaps you'd learn to read and comprehend before posting? I was responding to TGB's question (which I quoted), not indicating that the incident OP referenced was being legislated. Tyson has a right to listen to whomever they want, just like as a consumer I have a right to avoid companies that I feel are not doing the right thing for the country. My point to TGB was exactly that I don't think this stuff should be legislated, no matter what religion it is.

I think I comprehend just fine. You talked about boycotting Tyson because they are "bending over to the religious nutcases" in a post where you're complaining about folks legislating their religion and forcing other to believe in it. If you meant something else, it's not at all obvious to me what that might have been.

Ok, so you're not following the discussion then. There are two separate discussions, one TGB was regarding legislation of religion, secular government etc., while the other was about Tyson bending over to the religious nuts. You seem to have combined them into one -- they are separate, and my post had two parts each referencing one of the two issues.

Regardless, this is the kind of thing that populations who don't want to assimilate or integrate will do, and companies that give into it are helping erode American culture. Call me a drama queen if it makes you feel good, but I find that a perfectly fine reason to avoid purchasing from that company.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Ok, so you're not following the discussion then. There are two separate discussions, one TGB was regarding legislation of religion, secular government etc., while the other was about Tyson bending over to the religious nuts. You seem to have combined them into one -- they are separate, and my post had two parts each referencing one of the two issues.

Regardless, this is the kind of thing that populations who don't want to assimilate or integrate will do, and companies that give into it are helping erode American culture. Call me a drama queen if it makes you feel good, but I find that a perfectly fine reason to avoid purchasing from that company.

THE discussion is about Tyson catering to the interests of the majority of its employees in one single location (1300 workers IIRC), as determined by a vote of all the employees at the location. So they were not bending over to religious nuts.

This is as much about any supposed lack of assimilation or integration of immigrants as is a Chinese restaurant.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Originally posted by: Rainsford
...

I think I comprehend just fine. You talked about boycotting Tyson because they are "bending over to the religious nutcases" in a post where you're complaining about folks legislating their religion and forcing other to believe in it. If you meant something else, it's not at all obvious to me what that might have been.

Ok, so you're not following the discussion then. There are two separate discussions, one TGB was regarding legislation of religion, secular government etc., while the other was about Tyson bending over to the religious nuts. You seem to have combined them into one -- they are separate, and my post had two parts each referencing one of the two issues.

My mistake. Since you posted those ideas together, I assumed you were trying to link them.

Regardless, this is the kind of thing that populations who don't want to assimilate or integrate will do, and companies that give into it are helping erode American culture. Call me a drama queen if it makes you feel good, but I find that a perfectly fine reason to avoid purchasing from that company.

I don't think the goal is to "feel good" so much as it is to call it like I see it. I think the concept of "assimilating" is taken way too far, American culture isn't supposed to be set in stone...and it doesn't have to be exactly the same for everyone. Cultures change and adapt to new ideas, I don't think that's the same thing as "eroding". The only way your objection makes sense is if I accept the idea that the culture of these folks is worse than anything we have right now.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Originally posted by: Rainsford
I don't think the goal is to "feel good" so much as it is to call it like I see it. I think the concept of "assimilating" is taken way too far, American culture isn't supposed to be set in stone...and it doesn't have to be exactly the same for everyone. Cultures change and adapt to new ideas, I don't think that's the same thing as "eroding". The only way your objection makes sense is if I accept the idea that the culture of these folks is worse than anything we have right now.

That's a fair point, culture is not set in stone, and it does change and update itself. The way I see it though is that most people who come from other cultures come here because they are trying to escape some hellhole. Optimally America would absorb a small part of their culture into the mix (increasing our diversity), while they would assimilate and absorb a significant portion of existing American culture. That doesn't appear to be happening. And yes, I believe that the culture of these folks *is* worse than our culture. After all, that culture helped create the hellhole they are escaping from. Taking little bits (the good parts!) from the culture makes sense, but establishing that culture as a whole here does not, it just transplants the problem from some other country to this one.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Originally posted by: Rainsford
I don't think the goal is to "feel good" so much as it is to call it like I see it. I think the concept of "assimilating" is taken way too far, American culture isn't supposed to be set in stone...and it doesn't have to be exactly the same for everyone. Cultures change and adapt to new ideas, I don't think that's the same thing as "eroding". The only way your objection makes sense is if I accept the idea that the culture of these folks is worse than anything we have right now.

That's a fair point, culture is not set in stone, and it does change and update itself. The way I see it though is that most people who come from other cultures come here because they are trying to escape some hellhole. Optimally America would absorb a small part of their culture into the mix (increasing our diversity), while they would assimilate and absorb a significant portion of existing American culture. That doesn't appear to be happening. And yes, I believe that the culture of these folks *is* worse than our culture. After all, that culture helped create the hellhole they are escaping from. Taking little bits (the good parts!) from the culture makes sense, but establishing that culture as a whole here does not, it just transplants the problem from some other country to this one.

I see what you're saying, but I guess I don't see that happening. Things like celebrating traditional holidays is the kind of "little bit" of culture transfer that is good for our country overall, or at least pretty harmless.

I think that in some ways it's easy to underestimate the degree of assimilation among recent immigrant populations. People new to this country are naturally going to take a little time to accept a new way of doing things, especially since we're far more open to multiculturalism than we used to be. But as you pointed out, generally people come here (or immigrate to any country) for a reason. I think that the Muslim immigrant population will end up pretty much like the rest of the legal immigrants in this country.

Honestly, I think a rise in the number of Muslim-Americans is a GOOD thing. Islamic extremism is a lot harder sell to young Muslims in the Middle East if the alternative is to be an Islamic stock broker or Islamic engineer in the United States or another western country.
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Nebor
They don't see this as democracy at work, or tolerance. They see this as weakness, and a lack of caring about our own holidays, traditions and culture.

Why is the majority of workers in a plant choosing the day off that works for the most of them anything but democracy at work? You honestly think Tyson allowing their employees to more easily celebrate their religious holidays is a bad thing?

This thread is retarded, but it will be fun to watch it bring out the crazies.

I think Tyson should start processing more pork in that facility. ;)
 

QuicknDirty

Senior member
Dec 26, 2002
306
0
0
Socio, don't you have some crosses to burn or something?

Your posts do nothing but highlight the backward ass ignorance that still exists in the US, and should make any rational person sad that society as a whole has to put up with idiots like you under our "freedom of speech" concept.

This thread is rediculous as is this entire story which is only getting around as a way to spread hate mongering and idiocy... and elsewhere in other forums is somehow being tied to Obama and his campaign. LMAO!

It's quite simple, actually and is good example of how unions and Democracy as a whole works-

1)A majority of a group of employees decided they wanted to change their choice of paid holidays.

2) They were able to generate enough votes in their union to get it done.

3) The company they worked for saw it was a majority request, so they agreed.

How exactly is that not American AND Democratic??
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: eskimospy

Tyson would have to be insane to say no to that, or just huge dicks. The best part is that Labor Day is supposed to celebrate the power of workers to change their circumstances for the better, and you guys are going nuts about workers doing just that.

Seek help guys, you're dangerously paranoid.
Their Texans, it's an inbred trait.

I was about to be offended by that...

Then I realized that I am a transplant and live in Austin...so I'm not really a Texan because of both/either of those reasons.
 

Vonkhan

Diamond Member
Feb 27, 2003
8,198
0
71
Originally posted by: QuicknDirty
Socio, don't you have some crosses to burn or something?

Your posts do nothing but highlight the backward ass ignorance that still exists in the US, and should make any rational person sad that society as a whole has to put up with idiots like you under our "freedom of speech" concept.

This thread is rediculous as is this entire story which is only getting around as a way to spread hate mongering and idiocy... and elsewhere in other forums is somehow being tied to Obama and his campaign. LMAO!

It's quite simple, actually and is good example of how unions and Democracy as a whole works-

1)A majority of a group of employees decided they wanted to change their choice of paid holidays.

2) They were able to generate enough votes in their union to get it done.

3) The company they worked for saw it was a majority request, so they agreed.

How exactly is that not American AND Democratic??

:thumbsup: well said sir