- Apr 19, 2005
- 7,461
- 499
- 126
https://www.wsj.com/articles/cord-cutters-beware-streaming-tv-prices-are-marching-higher-1536943821
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/cord-cutters-beware-streaming-tv-prices-are-marching-higher-1536943821
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...
I looked into cutting the cord recently. I pay $150 after taxes/fees for FIOS (triple play with 75/75 internet) - they raised me after my promo years were up and I couldn't get much lower even from a competitor. If I get internet only, it's already $60 minimum. Then I get a SlingTV or YT Live pkg and it's now up at $100 anyway. And I need a landline for work after that. Not exactly earth-shattering savings IMO. I also like browsing through the channels and settling on some random show to enjoy. The internet live-tv broadcast interfaces are still not quite there yet from what I've seen. One thing is for sure - I absolutely hate having to dig through Netflix or even my own Plex to find something worth watching if I'm sitting down for a snack or lounging in the living room for 30 minutes. Too many choices is not always a good thing. I can't be the only one who feels that way about Netflix.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/cord-cutters-beware-streaming-tv-prices-are-marching-higher-1536943821
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...
1) Internet only - download any shows
2) No stupid stream packages, get an over the air antenna if you want to surf when bored.
3) Why the hell do you NEED a landline for work? Tell work to pay for a cellphone or fuck off. My company will at minimal provide a cell phone - But either way if that isn't good enough buy a Skype# or something for < $10/month.
1) I already download shows and put them on my Plex. But I don't always sit down for 42 minutes straight and interrupting these more-important shows makes for a terrible viewing experience. Just give me a random good-enough show while I snack or take my quick lunch.
2) I tried one of these antennas and all I got were fricken Spanish channels. No idea why. Returned.
3) I work from home F/T and they won't even pay for a service like Vonage anymore. When I said landline, I meant a line other than my cellphone where I'd be using my personal number. And no, they won't pay for a cellphone - I'm not a support guy who constantly needs to be on the phone but I do have to call in for conf calls occasionally. I'm not quitting because they won't pay for a cellphone.
Can't read, stupid paywall.
Of all things to worry about though - for me it would be Netflix. They are PUMPING SHITLOADS into their investment - others are just streaming already established channels.
Ah yes that limited supply of being able to serve out copies of a TV show over intertubes.![]()
Its actually easier to understand this than it is to fight it.
Ah yes that limited supply of being able to serve out copies of a TV show over intertubes.
It has nothing to do with this. Ultimately companies like Netflix were always at best cash flow neutral and were burning cash from investors.
The end game basically being.
1. Charge what the market will bear
2. Don't actually make any money doing that but who cares the company is growing and so are your returns.
3. ??? magical debt magic
4. Uhoh turns out we needed to charge like, way more this whole time sorry guys.
Over the air TV hasn't gone up in price.
Yet. I think ATSC 3 may allow charging for some channels.![]()
Also I'm probably bias as far as the whole land-line thing. I work in consulting and having a cell-phone is bare minimum - so thats why they supply ALL employees with one.. especially for when we are on-site with clients and they don't have guest internet to tether.
Is that even legal? It seems kind of like work, requiring you to use your own car, but then not reimbursing you for mileage.I'm not quitting because they won't pay for a cellphone. I'm going to get Ooma or something cheap, but it's on my own dime. My old company paid for Vonage, new company won't but the pay is way better.
Anyone calling themselves a cord-cutter and then paying for commercial-TV is just a liar. The idea of cutting the cord is to get the content, not the commercials/bundles. Maybe i am just thinking of my own beliefs, but why would anyone pay for commercial television over a streaming service?
People have to remember that even if you are streaming TV or TV shows, it's still all controlled by the cable companies and the Media conglomerates. That's why we have the issue in the first place of expensive TV packages where you have to pay for channels you don't want.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/cord-cutters-beware-streaming-tv-prices-are-marching-higher-1536943821
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...
My definition of cutting the cord is the old school version. Using only free OTA channels and free streaming services. If you're paying for Netflix, Youtube Red, Hulu, etc, you're not really cutting the cord because you're still paying monthly fee to watch TV.
We haven't had any paid cable/satellite TV for over a decade and haven't had any paid streaming service like Netflix for over 7 years. So my daughter has grown up without watching any paid TV. Now she doesn't watch any TV, even the free local.