Texashiker
Lifer
- Dec 18, 2010
- 18,811
- 198
- 106
Two Tier Justice System Emerges?
We have had a two tier justice system for a long time.
One set of rules for big business, banks and the government, and another set of rules for everyone else.
Two Tier Justice System Emerges?
He is a US citizen and should have a trial by jury in a regular court.
.
People can lose their citizenship if the join foreign armies and serve as officers - or in armies hostile to US. Anybody blowing the legs off 5 yr olds for Allah should be considered in a foreign army. A civilian court is dangerous and expensive. All the Marxist lawyers from Columbia will turn this case into a circus for years to come. Its always telling that libs always favor criminals over victims, enemies over citizens. Ted Kennedy running to Soviet Union for help beating Reagan really summed them up.
"Ted Kennedy's Soviet Gambit"
http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/27/te...eagan-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson.html
Leave it to nut job conservatives to want to shred the constitution.
The lack of Miranda rights and the issue about whether to try him in a military court really are two separate issues. Terrorists like the shoe bomber etc were all questioned prior to their rights being read, so this is not really something new. The public safety exemption has been around for awhile. And I see no chance that he will be tried in a military court......
leave it to kinkster libs to support guys shredding babies legs (like the New Black Panther buds of Obama's that want to kill "cracker babies")
You guarantee what?? You have no clue at all.....I guarantee if the bombers were White or Black Christians, or Japanese psychos, there would be no calls to declare them enemy combatants. Does the discrepancy mean that US Muslims are in effect second class citizens?
You guarantee what?? You have no clue at all.....
I support the rule of law and the US Constitution.
Its just so fucking comical. Certain conservatives and posters on this board bash Obama for his extrajudicial killing of an american citizen who was an active terrorist and living with a group of fellow terrorists in a foreign country. That extrajudicial killing is more legitimate(but still high suspect and probably unconstitutional) than what you are wanting the government to do in this case.
Tim McVeigh, a SCUM of the earth was read his Miranda rights:
A lot has changed since the 1990s.
Tim McVeigh, a SCUM of the earth was read his Miranda rights:
Q. How did you begin to speak to Mr. McVeigh?
A. I read him his Miranda warning.
Q. What are they?
A. That is a card that informs the individual of his right to
remain silent or to have counsel present before speaking to me.
Q. Did Mr. McVeigh agree to speak to you?
A. Yes, he did.
Q. Did you go ahead and ask him some questions at that point?
A. Yes.
From
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mcveigh/mcveigharrest.html
This guy, also SCUM, should be treated the same way.
A lot has changed since the 1990s.
My understanding of the legal situation with Tsarnaev is as follows:
He's temporarily NOT being Mirandized so that he can be interrogated to collect potentially useful intelligence. However, any information collected during this non-Miranda period is barred from being used against him in any criminal proceedings.
Once the pre-Miranda interrogation period is over, he'll be Mirandized and then interviewed by a completely independent group not associated with the non-Miranda interviewers and having no knowledge of any information gathered during that period. Any criminal-justice legal actions against Tsarnaev would be based entirely on information collected before and after the non-Miranda period.
So as far as I can tell, Tsarnaev's due process rights will be protected, and he WILL eventually be charged under criminal law.
There's no perfect solution for the need to gather anti-terrorism intelligence and the need to protect the rights of defendants, but it seems to me that the process now in place is a pretty good compromise.
People can lose their citizenship if the join foreign armies and serve as officers - or in armies hostile to US. Anybody blowing the legs off 5 yr olds for Allah should be considered in a foreign army. A civilian court is dangerous and expensive. All the Marxist lawyers from Columbia will turn this case into a circus for years to come. Its always telling that libs always favor criminals over victims, enemies over citizens. Ted Kennedy running to Soviet Union for help beating Reagan really summed them up.
"Ted Kennedy's Soviet Gambit"
http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/27/te...eagan-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson.html
Your meter needs recalibrating.He is a US citizen; this is his home country. As for the rest of your post... you're weird.
The Republicans are taking a stance ahead of any decision by Dear Leader and his ragtag group of Marxists, malcontents and cross-dressers. It's to be applauded. Take a firm stance now and the compromise might actually result in a conviction 10 years from now. Capitulate right out of the gate and we'd end up with him deported back to his home country with a monthly check from our government for life for his troubles.
I guarantee if the bombers were White or Black Christians, or Japanese psychos, there would be no calls to declare them enemy combatants. Does the discrepancy mean that US Muslims are in effect second class citizens?
