Two morons decided to open a website

user1234

Banned
Jul 11, 2004
2,428
0
0
their site is called HardOCP.com - pure example of extreme incompentence as far as hardware review are concerned


[pwned]
 

Steve

Lifer
May 2, 2004
15,945
11
81
Are you going to provide specific examples (fact), or just generalize (opinion)?
 

shimsham

Lifer
May 9, 2002
10,765
0
0
youre going to whine about when there is 57874089147581 other sites to go to?

im not crazy about their forums, but i like theyre reviews just as much as anywhere else.
 

user1234

Banned
Jul 11, 2004
2,428
0
0
Originally posted by: shimsham
youre going to whine about when there is 57874089147581 other sites to go to?

im not crazy about their forums, but i like theyre reviews just as much as anywhere else.


you like their meaningless comparisons - like two graphics cards, each running at a different resolutions, graphed together on the same chart ??!?!?
 

walla

Senior member
Jun 2, 2001
987
0
0
Originally posted by: shimsham
youre going to whine about when there is 57874089147581 other sites to go to?

im not crazy about their forums, but i like theyre reviews just as much as anywhere else.


more like 420543058734543 other sites.
 

user1234

Banned
Jul 11, 2004
2,428
0
0
Originally posted by: sm8000
Are you going to provide specific examples (fact), or just generalize (opinion)?


if you ever read their performance reviews you would know. Look at their MSI Neo4 SLI review which shows it's 10% faster the Asus A8N-SLI, opposie of AT review and any other website.
 

shimsham

Lifer
May 9, 2002
10,765
0
0
Originally posted by: user1234
Originally posted by: shimsham
youre going to whine about when there is 57874089147581 other sites to go to?

im not crazy about their forums, but i like theyre reviews just as much as anywhere else.


you like their meaningless comparisons - like two graphics cards, each running at a different resolutions, graphed together on the same chart ??!?!?

those are more beneficial to me than the 16x12 XxAA Xxaf avg fps, since my 17"lcd cant do that high a res. minimum fps are just as important, if not more so, than avg. to me. i dont care if it avgs 50 or 80 fps, but i do care if it hits 15. at least with their reviews i can get a better idea at what res. and details i can play with and not drop below ~30 fps.

besides, they do the 16x12 etc. also for an apples to apples. best of both styles IMO. why wouldnt i like that?

 

shimsham

Lifer
May 9, 2002
10,765
0
0
Originally posted by: walla
Originally posted by: shimsham
youre going to whine about when there is 57874089147581 other sites to go to?

im not crazy about their forums, but i like theyre reviews just as much as anywhere else.


more like 420543058734543 other sites.


oops.:eek:
 

user1234

Banned
Jul 11, 2004
2,428
0
0
yeah they do apples-to-aplles but only a small subset, the rest is garbage because people want to be able to compare performance of two systems, not have them say "system A is capable of this, and system B of that - now let's compare performance !" - WTF does that mean ? sure, we can see that system A must be faster cause it uses higher settings, but you never know exactly how much faster it is, becuase it is being compared with a handicap. Meaningless garbage IMO