TV Cameraman Killed Trying To Get Video Of A Dangerous Intersection

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
http://www.wave3.com/Global/story.asp?S=1935777

(OMAHA, Neb., June 11th, 2004, 4 p.m.) -- A TV cameraman was struck and killed by a car while shooting video of a dangerous intersection where two teenagers died in a wreck a month ago.

Jeff Frolio, 45, died Thursday.

The reporter who was working with Frolio said Friday that the assignment had already been completed but that Frolio insisted on returning to the spot so that he could get better footage.

"I hope people understand that he was trying to make my story better, trying to make our coverage better and trying to give the people at home a better glimpse at the two lives that had been taken at that same intersection," KETV reporter Kevin Tomich said.

Authorities said no charges would be brought against the driver. They said there was no evidence the driver was speeding or did anything else wrong.

The accident happened near the same blind intersection where two teenagers were killed May 4 when their vehicle was struck by a pickup.

Frolio and Tomich were working on a story about the Nebraska Roads Department's plans to make the intersection safer.

Frolio was not satisfied with the footage, shot earlier in the day by another cameraman, of a roadside memorial to the two teens, Tomich said. The deadline for the 6 p.m. newscast was approaching, but Frolio insisted on shooting more video and got out of the KETV satellite truck.

Tomich said he popped his head out of the truck a few minutes later and noticed that cars had pulled to the side of the road and that a sheriff's deputy was there.

"That's when I saw the camera lying on the shoulder," Tomich said. "I went across the street and Jeff was on his back. The trooper was holding his hand. His eyes were still open. He wasn't talking. He was moaning."

Frolio died later at a hospital.

The intersection has seen many close calls. The problem, neighbors say, is that when drivers headed north or south reach the stop sign, they cannot see eastbound traffic approaching because of a hill. The speed limit for the east- and westbound traffic is 60 mph.

A road sign warns of the blind intersection, but the Roads Department plans to create more shoulder room and move the painted stop bars on the road so that drivers can see oncoming traffic more easily.

Dustin Kruger, whose friend Kayla Wilkins was killed in last month's crash, said the intersection should probably have a light.

"When you come up on this intersection, you can't see halfway down that hill. About the time you see them is when you're about halfway into the street," he said. "You have to gun it to get around there or get across."
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Originally posted by: maziwanka
im pretty sure this is a repost

So these days the Repost Nazis are on such a hair-trigger that they'll jump into a thread even if they're not certain it's actually a repost?

Wow...
 

Bootprint

Diamond Member
Jan 11, 2002
9,847
0
0
Originally posted by: acemcmac
From the north... the approach that's coming down a hill that most people would speed on, the entire intersection is visible at a quarter mile including about 30 feet after the intersection before the bend starts. The secondary road that crosses is blind to traffic coming from the south, but not the north. Traffic on the primary road coming from the south is blind to everything and has no warning that there is a new stop sign. However, since the hill begins below the intersection, a vehicle approaching from the south, unless the driver is being really stupid, will quickly be reduced from any speed up to 70 down to the speed limit in the distance approaching the intersection... I hit this road 8-10 times a week and know it very well. This is totally, totally unnecessary and it's a small enough town that if anyone had died or even been hit, I think I'd have heard.

Thank you all for pointing out what an assh0le I am though. Mabye I just need to go down there with a digicam to make my point... something I wont be doing unless I go before city hall. I'm sure I'm not the only person pissed about this...


And this has what to do with the death of a cameraman?
 

acemcmac

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
13,712
1
0
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: acemcmac
From the north... the approach that's coming down a hill that most people would speed on, the entire intersection is visible at a quarter mile including about 30 feet after the intersection before the bend starts. The secondary road that crosses is blind to traffic coming from the south, but not the north. Traffic on the primary road coming from the south is blind to everything and has no warning that there is a new stop sign. However, since the hill begins below the intersection, a vehicle approaching from the south, unless the driver is being really stupid, will quickly be reduced from any speed up to 70 down to the speed limit in the distance approaching the intersection... I hit this road 8-10 times a week and know it very well. This is totally, totally unnecessary and it's a small enough town that if anyone had died or even been hit, I think I'd have heard.

Thank you all for pointing out what an assh0le I am though. Mabye I just need to go down there with a digicam to make my point... something I wont be doing unless I go before city hall. I'm sure I'm not the only person pissed about this...


And this has what to do with the death of a cameraman?

I really am sorry about that, I thought was still posting in my own thread...
that really is sad though... I'm gunna go look for pictures of that intersection and see if it compares at all to mine...
 

TranceNation

Platinum Member
Jan 6, 2001
2,041
0
0
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: maziwanka
im pretty sure this is a repost

So these days the Repost Nazis are on such a hair-trigger that they'll jump into a thread even if they're not certain it's actually a repost?

Wow...

lol
 

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
I was reading another article on this, in which I believe it said that that the guy that died actually thought the intersection was safe.

KK

Edit: I guess it was the sherriff that thought the intersection was safe, not the dead guy.