Tupac is alive

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,559
8
0
Tupac and elvis are chilling somewhere in fresno. NOBODY would think to look there for them.
 

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
Wow, when did hologram tech get this good?!?

Umm... all along? It's no different than the Sega Holosseum or Time Traveler arcades. It's 2D, pre-rendered, Mo-Cap animated movie projected up using mirrors and it only works if there is a pitch black background/foreground/floor around the projected objects. It wouldn't work with a flying camera going around it unless the render adapted for that camera's specific viewpoint and then it would break for everyone else (he would be spinning in place). Even then, that's eye-tracing and you'd need AFR for stereo (Alternate Frame Rendering for shutter glasses).

Perhaps you're simply impressed that CGI has gotten to this point, but it was very clearly CGI. Also, it could have just as easily been a live look-alike actor on a green-screen (it wasn't), so being a "hologram" is irrelevant.
 
Last edited:

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
Umm... all along? It's no different than the Sega Holosseum ot Time Traveler arcades. It's 2D, pre-rendered, Mo-Cap animated movie projected up using mirrors and it only works if there is a pitch black background/foreground/floor around the projected objects. It wouldn't work with a flying camera going around it.

Um, I'm pretty sure it's QUITE different
 

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
Um, I'm pretty sure it's QUITE different

No. It isn't. Also, read my edit above.

People are stupid. Remember that stupid CNN "hologram" thing? Ugh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thOxW19vsTg

As if it has any bearing to the viewer or has anything to do with being a hologram! It's just tracking multiple viewpoint to overlay, exactly like Star Wars pioneered in the '70s with programmable camera movements except now done in real-time with dynamic viewpoints (pointless if you can't control the perspective - same effect for the at-home viewer). Actually, the effect WOULD be better if it actually moved a camera in both studios and created the overly after a short time delay (the studio people can't see it anyway). You can clearly see it switch source cameras when the perspective jumps during slow camera movements.
 
Last edited:

Insomniator

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2002
6,294
171
106
Umm... all along? It's no different than the Sega Holosseum ot Time Traveler arcades. It's 2D, pre-rendered, Mo-Cap animated movie projected up using mirrors and it only works if there is a pitch black background/foreground/floor around the projected objects. It wouldn't work with a flying camera going around it unless the render adapted for that camera's specific viewpoint and then it would break for everyone else (he would be spinning in place). Even then, that's eye-tracing and you'd need AFR for stereo (Alternate Frame Rendering for shutter glasses).

Sega Holosseum - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUWt6pu_uIs

No, I think this is a little different.
 

njdevilsfan87

Platinum Member
Apr 19, 2007
2,341
264
126
Exactly. People are sheep, especially if they thought Snoop saw 2pac from a different perspective.

1:15 in the camera angles changes? (From the link eits posted)

For a both moment there, it looked like two different perspectives...
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Coachella-Holograms-1334588463.jpg