• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

TTA 2.0 lossless audio codec

hrm ..

did a few wav files and it was around 500KBs lower than ape.

course i don't feel like doing commands all night. but on a few music files, it's not really that ahead of the pack.

besides .. lpac and ape, optimafrog sound better than tta
 
Originally posted by: Sid59
besides .. lpac and ape, optimafrog sound better than tta
Click to expand...
how can it sound better if it's lossless?
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: scottdog81
Originally posted by: Sid59
besides .. lpac and ape, optimafrog sound better than tta
Click to expand...
how can it sound better if it's lossless?
rolleye.gif
Click to expand...

i meant the name. guess i was too rushed to hit reply. besides .. you do realize lossless means decoding back to the original and identical wav and not the sound. -- you might be thinking transparent.

ill read over at HA to see if they reviewed it.
 
Originally posted by: pulse8
When you're dealing with lossless formats, what's 20MB here and there for a whole album?
Click to expand...
multiply by the hundreds of albums most collections are.....plus look at that speed....😎
 
Originally posted by: Sid59
some results are out over at HA .. some of us care and some don't.. link anyhow
Click to expand...
Thanks, looks like the size comparison is misleading and based on specially-chosen CDs that do better in TTA while the HA posters are getting about the same or worse compression than other codecs.

Misleading stats, restrictive license, evasive developer -- I think I'll stick with FLAC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top