truth@politics

[coby1man]

Its unfortunate that the general public's views change so
rapidly. This is obviously not a shift in the publics views
but a lack of understanding of their potential presidential
candidate. So I am proposing a website that would share
the simple facts, and would be a great resource.

http://ideashappen.msn.com/Ent.../Default.aspx?id=20358

please support the idea by clicking on "i'm feelin' it" button

 

[Infohawk]

First of all, does the description box have to be so dang small?

Second of all, how does this differ from factcheck.org?

Third, can you give some examples of what you'd have in the context of Bush vs. Kerry?

 

[coby1man]

sorry about the description box, they really should have consulted me =) about user friendly interfaces.

factcheck.org is very specific but does not encompass the basic. I believe the majority of the american population cannot identify either candidate's position on major issues such as healthcare, foreign policy, economy. except in vauge general terms.

Not sure what you mean in yout thrid question.

 

[Infohawk]

My third request was for you to give an example of the content you would have using this election's candidates.

 

[Ozoned]

Ideas are fine but what about Ideers?

Got to have balance also.

 

[coby1man]

what do you mean by balance?

What it intended for the site is the presidential candidate's voting history(for laws), personal information (religious social, and business.) stances on major issues. etc
in terms of specific content I have none as no research has been done.

 

[Infohawk]

I voted for I'm feeling it (why not after all).

coby1man, how did you hear about P&N?