What, don't want a candy crush repeat from 2012?
Come on, it's perfectly legitimate for Democrat moderators to step in, swing the election for their candidate, and then later apologize for being wrong.
I love how it's never the
glaringly unpopular core beliefs and policies of the republican party and their candidates, but the evil liberal media and evil liberal debate moderators that manage to convince the population that the liberal candidate is better.
Come on guys, none of this theory makes sense: if you guys are so smart and it's so painfully obvious that "the others" are biased against your "silent majority," then wouldn't that actually show in the polls? Those of you in the "silent majority"
know that the media is biased against you, so of course such biases don't effect your voting, right? It doesn't, because there is no such thing as the "silent majority" as invented by Nixon and, yes: voters actually don't support republican policies. If you actually were a majority and are immune to these evil biases,
then you would manage a majority of votes despite the evil liberal lies in the media.
Further, considering that republicans usually turn out at a higher rate than democratic voters, it shows just how much of a minority the GOP has become.