Non zero chance that in 2024 GOP run states that a D might win refuse to certify their elections and the US House, now GOP led, appoints him President as he sits in NY state prison.
Wow, what a timeline we live in.
Non zero chance that in 2024 GOP run states that a D might win refuse to certify their elections and the US House, now GOP led, appoints him President as he sits in NY state prison.
I think, in this academic exercise, the two of you are discussing slightly different things. You're coming back to "arresting the president" which implies the arrest comes after swearing in and he's coming back to "an incarcerated person gets elected president" which implies that arrest contest before swearing in.Yes but under this interpretation of the Constitution any time a state wants it can render the federal government inoperative, which would make a mockery of the supremacy clause.
States can't interfere with the operation of the federal government, and arresting the president certainly does that.
Eventually Trump trying to keep his options open is going to spectacularly collide with a veritable mob of rabidly ambitious MAGAing GOP would-be presidential candidates which only grows with each passing day.
If that happened the unrest, the demonstrations, the civil disobedience, the violence that would ensue would make the George Floyd uprising look like a picnic.
I think as far as the Constitution is concerned they are the same thing because a state stopping the lawfully elected president from taking office is also infringing on the function of the federal executive branch.I think, in this academic exercise, the two of you are discussing slightly different things. You're coming back to "arresting the president" which implies the arrest comes after swearing in and he's coming back to "an incarcerated person gets elected president" which implies that arrest contest before swearing in.
I mean at the most extreme level a person elected to the presidency while incarcerated in a hostile state would never become President because the state would prevent the president-elect from ever taking the oath of office.
Non zero chance that in 2024 GOP run states that a D might win refuse to certify their elections and the US House, now GOP led, appoints him President as he sits in NY state prison.
I think as far as the Constitution is concerned they are the same thing because a state stopping the lawfully elected president from taking office is also infringing on the function of the federal executive branch.
If Trump goes to prison and is somehow elected again I 100% guarantee you he will be immediately released. Constitution aside, as a functional matter Trump could simply order the army to secure his release.
While I remain confident that he would be quickly released upon winning the presidency I don't think he would get any special rights during the campaign so they could restrict him in all the ways you mention and more.I would think the courts would have to rule before he's "immediately released"?. .I suppose Trump could probably bring suit arguing that his continued incarceration inhibits his ability to execute his duties as President and request that his sentence be suspended during his term. Impossible to say how the courts would rule.
But I agree with you. This would be the constitutional crisis of epic proportions and any rulings would probably be moot.
There is a possibility that he could be running while indicted and out on bail.
What restrictions does the court place on someone that would make it difficult to campaign effectively? If someone is out on bond while awaiting trial, can they travel outside the jurisdiction of the court? Can he solicit donations and associate with possible co-defendants or witnesses? Can he be prohibited from talking about the case as a condition of bail?
There might not be a law specifically preventing Trump from running for president while indicted, but what kind of campaign could he undertake while out on bail?
And then what? What happens in that scenario?Non zero chance that in 2024 GOP run states that a D might win refuse to certify their elections and the US House, now GOP led, appoints him President as he sits in NY state prison.
Israel needs Trump to MIGA again. Of course he's going to run.
Legally, Trump becomes president again. As a practical matter, potentially a civil war. The basic question to Biden in that situation is if he’s willing to surrender power, knowing that by doing so he is ending democracy in the United States.And then what? What happens in that scenario?
There's an enormous difference between people attacking the capitol because they've been warped to believe a preposterous lie that the election was stolen from their candidate and the opposite scenario being people showing up where ever to protest the actual theft of the presidency from their candidate who won it fair and square. Do you think?People are fickle.
Never underestimate laziness. Out of 74 million Trumpanzees how many actually showed up on January 6th?
You really think a greater number than that will try to protect democracy when they can sit back in their lazyboy and watch tv?
What I am getting is that, a civil war is actually inching closer by the day, its no longer "unthinkable", it is in fact what the R's actions is heading towards.Legally, Trump becomes president again. As a practical matter, potentially a civil war. The basic question to Biden in that situation is if he’s willing to surrender power, knowing that by doing so he is ending democracy in the United States.
Maybe he would though! People don’t seem to realize it but in states like Wisconsin Republicans have for all intents and purposes ended democracy already, at least as it applies to the legislature, and people just take it in stride.
I doubt that. Nobody unites and excites the base like Trump. I think he has at least a 50/50 chance to win, especially if Biden bows out and Kamala is the candidate.
A lot depends on the economy, I think. We are due for a "correction" or worse in the market, and inflation could also be starting to rear its ugly head.
It's a ploy to keep the shekels flowing. Duh.
Israel needs Trump to MIGA again. Of course he's going to run.
What I am getting is that, a civil war is actually inching closer by the day, its no longer "unthinkable", it is in fact what the R's actions is heading towards.
And give way to the rise of China and authoritarian mafia states.Sad but true.
It's a shame we could lose a democracy, a way of life, over conservatives choosing their delusional greed over America. It's a fight they would lose, but America would be the real loser. The post WW2 order would be over. Done. Gone forever.
I would think the courts would have to rule before he's "immediately released"?. .I suppose Trump could probably bring suit arguing that his continued incarceration inhibits his ability to execute his duties as President and request that his sentence be suspended during his term. Impossible to say how the courts would rule.
But I agree with you. This would be the constitutional crisis of epic proportions and any rulings would probably be moot.
There is a possibility that he could be running while indicted and out on bail.
What restrictions does the court place on someone that would make it difficult to campaign effectively? If someone is out on bond while awaiting trial, can they travel outside the jurisdiction of the court? Can he solicit donations and associate with possible co-defendants or witnesses? Can he be prohibited from talking about the case as a condition of bail?
There might not be a law specifically preventing Trump from running for president while indicted, but what kind of campaign could he undertake while out on bail?
