Trump to military 'You’re a bunch of dopes and babies' 'You’re all losers' 'You don’t know how to win anymore.'

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,107
1,260
126
In the interest of full disclosure this supposedly happened in a meeting with top military brass and Trump in 2017 according to a book written by 2 reporters that is coming out.
admin allisolm



...
Just before 10 a.m. on a scorching summer Thursday, Trump arrived at the Pentagon. He stepped out of his motorcade, walked along a corridor with portraits honoring former chairmen of the Joint Chiefs, and stepped inside the Tank. The uniformed officers greeted their commander in chief. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Joseph F. Dunford Jr. sat in the seat of honor midway down the table, because this was his room, and Trump sat at the head of the table facing a projection screen. Mattis and the newly confirmed deputy defense secretary, Patrick Shanahan, sat to the president’s left, with Vice President Pence and Tillerson to his right. Down the table sat the leaders of the military branches, along with Cohn and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. White House chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon was in the outer ring of chairs with other staff, taking his seat just behind Mattis and directly in Trump’s line of sight.

Mattis, Cohn, and Tillerson and their aides decided to use maps, graphics, and charts to tutor the president, figuring they would help keep him from getting bored. Mattis opened with a slide show punctuated by lots of dollar signs. Mattis devised a strategy to use terms the impatient president, schooled in real estate, would appreciate to impress upon him the value of U.S. investments abroad. He sought to explain why U.S. troops were deployed in so many regions and why America’s safety hinged on a complex web of trade deals, alliances, and bases across the globe.

An opening line flashed on the screen, setting the tone: “The post-war international rules-based order is the greatest gift of the greatest generation.” Mattis then gave a 20-minute briefing on the power of the NATO alliance to stabilize Europe and keep the United States safe. Bannon thought to himself, “Not good. Trump is not going to like that one bit.” The internationalist language Mattis was using was a trigger for Trump.

“Oh, baby, this is going to be f---ing wild,” Bannon thought. “If you stood up and threatened to shoot [Trump], he couldn’t say ‘postwar rules-based international order.’ It’s just not the way he thinks.”

For the next 90 minutes, Mattis, Tillerson, and Cohn took turns trying to emphasize their points, pointing to their charts and diagrams. They showed where U.S. personnel were positioned, at military bases, CIA stations, and embassies, and how U.S. deployments fended off the threats of terror cells, nuclear blasts, and destabilizing enemies in places including Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, the Korea Peninsula, and Syria. Cohn spoke for about 20 minutes about the value of free trade with America’s allies, emphasizing how he saw each trade agreement working together as part of an overall structure to solidify U.S. economic and national security.
Trump appeared peeved by the schoolhouse vibe but also allergic to the dynamic of his advisers talking at him. His ricocheting attention span led him to repeatedly interrupt the lesson. He heard an adviser say a word or phrase and then seized on that to interject with his take. For instance, the word “base” prompted him to launch in to say how “crazy” and “stupid” it was to pay for bases in some countries.

Trump’s first complaint was to repeat what he had vented about to his national security adviser months earlier: South Korea should pay for a $10 billion missile defense system that the United States built for it. The system was designed to shoot down any short- and medium-range ballistic missiles from North Korea to protect South Korea and American troops stationed there. But Trump argued that the South Koreans should pay for it, proposing that the administration pull U.S. troops out of the region or bill the South Koreans for their protection.

“We should charge them rent,” Trump said of South Korea. “We should make them pay for our soldiers. We should make money off of everything.”
Trump proceeded to explain that NATO, too, was worthless. U.S. generals were letting the allied member countries get away with murder, he said, and they owed the United States a lot of money after not living up to their promise of paying their dues.

“They’re in arrears,” Trump said, reverting to the language of real estate. He lifted both his arms at his sides in frustration. Then he scolded top officials for the untold millions of dollars he believed they had let slip through their fingers by allowing allies to avoid their obligations.
“We are owed money you haven’t been collecting!” Trump told them. “You would totally go bankrupt if you had to run your own business.”

Mattis wasn’t trying to convince the president of anything, only to explain and provide facts. Now things were devolving quickly. The general tried to calmly explain to the president that he was not quite right. The NATO allies didn’t owe the United States back rent, he said. The truth was more complicated. NATO had a nonbinding goal that members should pay at least 2 percent of their gross domestic product on their defenses. Only five of the countries currently met that goal, but it wasn’t as if they were shorting the United States on the bill.

More broadly, Mattis argued, the NATO alliance was not serving only to protect western Europe. It protected America, too. “This is what keeps us safe,” Mattis said. Cohn tried to explain to Trump that he needed to see the value of the trade deals. “These are commitments that help keep us safe,” Cohn said.
Bannon interjected. “Stop, stop, stop,” he said. “All you guys talk about all these great things, they’re all our partners, I want you to name me now one country and one company that’s going to have his back.”

Trump then repeated a threat he’d made countless times before. He wanted out of the Iran nuclear deal that President Obama had struck in 2015, which called for Iran to eliminate its uranium stockpile and cut its nuclear weaponry.

“It’s the worst deal in history!” Trump declared.

“Well, actually . . .,” Tillerson interjected.

“I don’t want to hear it,” Trump said, cutting off the secretary of state before he could explain some of the benefits of the agreement. “They’re cheating. They’re building. We’re getting out of it. I keep telling you, I keep giving you time, and you keep delaying me. I want out of it.”
Before they could debate the Iran deal, Trump erupted to revive another frequent complaint: the war in Afghanistan, which was now America’s longest war. He demanded an explanation for why the United States hadn’t won in Afghanistan yet, now 16 years after the nation began fighting there in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Trump unleashed his disdain, calling Afghanistan a “loser war.” That phrase hung in the air and disgusted not only the military leaders at the table but also the men and women in uniform sitting along the back wall behind their principals. They all were sworn to obey their commander in chief’s commands, and here he was calling the war they had been fighting a loser war.

“You’re all losers,” Trump said. “You don’t know how to win anymore.”

Trump questioned why the United States couldn’t get some oil as payment for the troops stationed in the Persian Gulf. “We spent $7 trillion; they’re ripping us off,” Trump boomed. “Where is the f---ing oil?”

Trump seemed to be speaking up for the voters who elected him, and several attendees thought they heard Bannon in Trump’s words. Bannon had been trying to persuade Trump to withdraw forces by telling him, “The American people are saying we can’t spend a trillion dollars a year on this. We just can’t. It’s going to bankrupt us.”
“And not just that, the deplorables don’t want their kids in the South China Sea at the 38th parallel or in Syria, in Afghanistan, in perpetuity,” Bannon would add, invoking Hillary Clinton’s infamous “basket of deplorables” reference to Trump supporters.

Trump mused about removing General John Nicholson, the U.S. commander in charge of troops in Afghanistan. “I don’t think he knows how to win,” the president said, impugning Nicholson, who was not present at the meeting.

Dunford tried to come to Nicholson’s defense, but the mild-mannered general struggled to convey his points to the irascible president.
“Mr. President, that’s just not . . .,” Dunford started. “We’ve been under different orders.”

Dunford sought to explain that he hadn’t been charged with annihilating the enemy in Afghanistan but was instead following a strategy started by the Obama administration to gradually reduce the military presence in the country in hopes of training locals to maintain a stable government so that eventually the United States could pull out. Trump shot back in more plain language.

“I want to win,” he said. “We don’t win any wars anymore . . . We spend $7 trillion, everybody else got the oil and we’re not winning anymore.”
Trump by now was in one of his rages. He was so angry that he wasn’t taking many breaths. All morning, he had been coarse and cavalier, but the next several things he bellowed went beyond that description. They stunned nearly everyone in the room, and some vowed that they would never repeat them. Indeed, they have not been reported until now.

“I wouldn’t go to war with you people,” Trump told the assembled brass.

Addressing the room, the commander in chief barked, “You’re a bunch of dopes and babies.”

For a president known for verbiage he euphemistically called “locker room talk,” this was the gravest insult he could have delivered to these people, in this sacred space. The flag officers in the room were shocked. Some staff began looking down at their papers, rearranging folders, almost wishing themselves out of the room. A few considered walking out. They tried not to reveal their revulsion on their faces, but questions raced through their minds. “How does the commander in chief say that?” one thought. “What would our worst adversaries think if they knew he said this?”

This was a president who had been labeled a “draft dodger” for avoiding service in the Vietnam War under questionable circumstances. Trump was a young man born of privilege and in seemingly perfect health: six feet two inches with a muscular build and a flawless medical record. He played several sports, including football. Then, in 1968 at age 22, he obtained a diagnosis of bone spurs in his heels that exempted him from military service just as the United States was drafting men his age to fulfill massive troop deployments to Vietnam.

Tillerson in particular was stunned by Trump’s diatribe and began visibly seething. For too many minutes, others in the room noticed, he had been staring straight, dumbfounded, at Mattis, who was speechless, his head bowed down toward the table. Tillerson thought to himself, “Gosh darn it, Jim, say something. Why aren’t you saying something?”

But, as he would later tell close aides, Tillerson realized in that moment that Mattis was genetically a Marine, unable to talk back to his commander in chief, no matter what nonsense came out of his mouth.

The more perplexing silence was from Pence, a leader who should have been able to stand up to Trump. Instead, one attendee thought, “He’s sitting there frozen like a statue. Why doesn’t he stop the president?” Another recalled the vice president was “a wax museum guy.” From the start of the meeting, Pence looked as if he wanted to escape and put an end to the president’s torrent. Surely, he disagreed with Trump’s characterization of military leaders as “dopes and babies,” considering his son, Michael, was a Marine first lieutenant then training for his naval aviator wings. But some surmised Pence feared getting crosswise with Trump. “A total deer in the headlights,” recalled a third attendee.

Others at the table noticed Trump’s stream of venom had taken an emotional toll. So many people in that room had gone to war and risked their lives for their country, and now they were being dressed down by a president who had not. They felt sick to their stomachs. Tillerson told others he thought he saw a woman in the room silently crying. He was furious and decided he couldn’t stand it another minute. His voice broke into Trump’s tirade, this one about trying to make money off U.S. troops.
“No, that’s just wrong,” the secretary of state said. “Mr. President, you’re totally wrong. None of that is true.”

Tillerson’s father and uncle had both been combat veterans, and he was deeply proud of their service.

“The men and women who put on a uniform don’t do it to become soldiers of fortune,” Tillerson said. “That’s not why they put on a uniform and go out and die . . . They do it to protect our freedom.”

There was silence in the Tank. Several military officers in the room were grateful to the secretary of state for defending them when no one else would. The meeting soon ended and Trump walked out, saying goodbye to a group of servicemen lining the corridor as he made his way to his motorcade waiting outside. Mattis, Tillerson, and Cohn were deflated. Standing in the hall with a small cluster of people he trusted, Tillerson finally let down his guard.

“He’s a f---ing moron,” the secretary of state said of the president.
...

Some of the people highest up are starting to talk. He's an unhinged, ignorant lunatic with the curtain pulled aside, not really surprising.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
37,351
17,551
146
Reality TV president, ironically, elected by a party who claims to loath the source of reality TV.

These are certainly the words of a stable genius, certainly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whm1974

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
82,024
44,790
136
It’s so typical Trump, he has the right vague concepts but he is too much of a know it all to evaluate and make a good decision or accept opinions or craft a good compromise. He ends up acting like a child.

Does he have the right vague concepts? If you’re referring to US overseas deployments he’s clearly fine with them, he just thinks other countries should be paying us protection money like a mob outfit.
 
Feb 4, 2009
34,191
15,362
136
Does he have the right vague concepts? If you’re referring to US overseas deployments he’s clearly fine with them, he just thinks other countries should be paying us protection money like a mob outfit.

Well in the sense that others should be paying a greater share into NATO, South Korea has historically gotten a great benefit out of having US troops stationed there, they can pay a little extra. Pissing away money in the middle east while we literally say healthcare can’t be afforded and we may have to cut social security.
Again at a one thousand foot view the President has the right ideas, he just doesn’t plan and poorly executes.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
82,024
44,790
136
Well in the sense that others should be paying a greater share into NATO, South Korea has historically gotten a great benefit out of having US troops stationed there, they can pay a little extra. Pissing away money in the middle east while we literally say healthcare can’t be afforded and we may have to cut social security.
Again at a one thousand foot view the President has the right ideas, he just doesn’t plan and poorly executes.

So wait you’re saying they should be paying even more than pre-Trump commitments had them at? I doubt it, and I doubt they would agree.

Remember, the US is not in South Korea out of the kindness of our hearts. The idea that the US is some rube getting soaked by other countries for their national defense is extremely naive. We are there for our purposes, not theirs.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
82,024
44,790
136
As an example of the relative worth of NATO to its members we should count up how many conflicts European countries have entered into on behalf of the US in the last, say, 70 years and how many conflicts the US has entered into on behalf of Europe. Then look at the severity of those conflicts. How much more is being a part of that really worth to Europe? Should they be sending us a bill?
 
Feb 4, 2009
34,191
15,362
136
So wait you’re saying they should be paying even more than pre-Trump commitments had them at? I doubt it, and I doubt they would agree.

Remember, the US is not in South Korea out of the kindness of our hearts. The idea that the US is some rube getting soaked by other countries for their national defense is extremely naive. We are there for our purposes, not theirs.

Nothing wrong with asking for more monies. There is something wrong with acting like a crime boss while asking for more money.
Nothing wrong with adding “pain” (pain term means discomfort not a physical beating) because they haven’t upped what they pay.
Acting like an oaf will not accomplish any goal long term
 
  • Like
Reactions: whm1974

ShookKnight

Senior member
Dec 12, 2019
646
658
96
Is this when & how conservatives are starting to distance themselves? Because that won't be allowed.

This bull shit of being part of the internal resistance and taking papers off his desk and protecting America is GARBAGE. There are TONS of people surrounding Trump. And they ALL witness his incompetence. They refuse to do anything because they choose to serve Trump and not serve the American people.

Fuck you.

And fuck you to anyone who tries to disassociate themselves with him.

You are all branded for life, as worthless traitorous pieces of shit; those who voted for him, those who defended him and those who did not do their jobs to save the country from him.

Shameful. Utterly shameful and disgusting.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
82,024
44,790
136
Nothing wrong with asking for more monies. There is something wrong with acting like a crime boss while asking for more money.
Nothing wrong with adding “pain” (pain term means discomfort not a physical beating) because they haven’t upped what they pay.
Acting like an oaf will not accomplish any goal long term

I mean we can always ask for anything, but I struggle to see what motivation they would have to say yes. If you look at the history of NATO the US is the primary beneficiary and they know this.

Ironically we will likely see increased EU and South Korean defense spending in the coming years but that will be because they no longer view the US as a dependable ally. This of course will become apparent next time we ask them for help with something.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
26,053
32,807
136
Hey c'mon guys. I'd just like to remind everyone that Trump went to a military prep school, receiving "more training militarily than a lot of the guys that go into the military."

Checkmate combat vets and Pentagon leadership. Tell it to the bone spurs.
 
Feb 4, 2009
34,191
15,362
136
Hey c'mon guys. I'd just like to remind everyone that Trump went to a military prep school, receiving "more training militarily than a lot of the guys that go into the military."

Checkmate combat vets and Pentagon leadership. Tell it to the bone spurs.

Thing I find funny is I bet around 80% of them voted Trump or threw their vote away on some dumb-dumb 3rd party guy because God Forbid She became President.

Have fun dealing with the Man Baby and his superior Military Training than you.
 

tweaker2

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,179
6,511
136
Trump and his simplistic way of viewing the world along with how the world, nay, the universe actually revolves around him is something that, in a shooting war under full engagement and prosecuted with extreme prejudice from all sides will get a whole lot more "good guys" get off'ed than not because he will employ the "Banzai Charge/Light Brigade/Custer's Last Stand Strategery and pat himself on the back for what a genius he is for thinking that one up and he will surround himself with adoring sycophants to prove he was right.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: whm1974 and Pohemi

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
15,994
13,716
136
Does he have the right vague concepts? If you’re referring to US overseas deployments he’s clearly fine with them, he just thinks other countries should be paying us protection money like a mob outfit.

What's ironic about Trump treating our relationship with our allies entirely as if it is some kind of financial balance sheet is that he tolerates running trillion dollar deficits at the same time. If Trump is trying to run the government like a business, he's doing a shitty job. He's what they call penny-wise and pound foolish. Penny wise to the point of alienating all of our allies and pound foolish because he's put us farther into the red than we've ever been.

There is no coherence to Trump's notions of governance because there are no underlying principles except his greed, ego and lust for power.
 

Stokely

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2017
1,441
1,742
136
God he's an idiot. Thank god for any "deep state" that is actually working against him, because his bully moronic thin-skinned ideas about how to deal with something as complex as foreign policy are just amazingly dangerous. He's not qualified to run even a bad tv show...er, wait....

Trump to military: you are idiots.
Military voters to Trump: thank you sir, may I have another. Trump 2020! (because anything is better than a libtard in office I guess)
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,641
5,208
136
So wait you’re saying they should be paying even more than pre-Trump commitments had them at? I doubt it, and I doubt they would agree.

Remember, the US is not in South Korea out of the kindness of our hearts. The idea that the US is some rube getting soaked by other countries for their national defense is extremely naive. We are there for our purposes, not theirs.

I'd say SK is getting a pretty big benefit of our presence wrt NK and China.

Our mutual interests are well aligned, but I'd expect a responsible leader pushing our advantage to a certain degree.

Problem Trump does this in a clumsy, haphazard and self-defeating way because he's an idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
15,994
13,716
136
I'd say SK is getting a pretty big benefit of our presence wrt NK and China.

Our mutual interests are well aligned, but I'd expect a responsible leader pushing our advantage to a certain degree.

Problem Trump does this in a clumsy, haphazard and self-defeating way because he's an idiot.

Bigger picture problem is what is Trump going to do with the money if he gets SK to pay for a missile defense system? Like I said above, we're running enormous deficits, largely as a result of Trump's huge cash giveaway to corporations and the wealthy. None of this could ever result in any net benefit to the American people. I['m tired of hearing about Trump haggling with allies over what amounts to relatively small amounts of money relative to our national budget, while he totally mismanages it at home.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
82,024
44,790
136
I'd say SK is getting a pretty big benefit of our presence wrt NK and China.

Our mutual interests are well aligned, but I'd expect a responsible leader pushing our advantage to a certain degree.

Problem Trump does this in a clumsy, haphazard and self-defeating way because he's an idiot.

I didn't say our allies see no benefit, just that I doubt they see a benefit that's consistent with paying dramatically more for US involvement.

South Korea is a rich country and could certainly build nuclear weapons and defend themselves that way if they wanted to. They don't do it because America asked them not to and pledged other protection in exchange. Because of their decision to take US troops instead of nukes the US not only gains powerful bases in the area but exerts a high level of control over all military engagements there.

So when the US asks South Korea to pay up for protecting it when the only reason it needs us for protection is that they did what we asked them to I'm sure one of their primary answers is 'BRB, nukes'. I imagine Japan would say the same. The point in the end is that people in America tend to focus on what we give as part of this arrangement and ignore what we get (and in many cases have demanded).
 

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,126
5,064
136
Hilarity would be if South Korea gives us the boot and stops subsidizing the US defense industry.
Too bad Japan doesn't give us the boot as well.

Imagine if every country told the US "No thanks"?
Probably see the Navy finally getting some love and actual seat at the table after 40 years of aimless wandering as everyone's bitch.

However, if all those countries decide to flip the bird to US arms manufacturers we'd get to see out defense industry collapse
 
  • Like
Reactions: whm1974

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
30,022
7,501
136
Trump and his simplistic way of viewing the world along with how the world, nay, the universe actually revolves around him is something that, in a shooting war under full engagement and prosecuted with extreme prejudice from all sides will get a whole lot more "good guys" get off'ed than not because he will employ the "Banzai Charge/Light Brigade/Custer's Last Stand Strategery and pat himself on the back for what a genius he is for thinking that one up and he will surround himself with adoring sycophants to prove he was right.
Hes a less charismatic, senile Zapp Brannigan!
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,641
5,208
136
God he's an idiot. Thank god for any "deep state" that is actually working against him, because his bully moronic thin-skinned ideas about how to deal with something as complex as foreign policy are just amazingly dangerous. He's not qualified to run even a bad tv show...er, wait....

Trump to military: you are idiots.
Military voters to Trump: thank you sir, may I have another. Trump 2020! (because anything is better than a libtard in office I guess)

I SAID...Kick me in the Jimmy!!!

22avtw.gif