Trump suggests that protesting should be illegal

dphantom

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2005
4,763
327
126
I shit you not.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...01309990777_story.html?utm_term=.7ca4024a1c8c

Donald Trump, the president of a country founded of protest said: “I think it’s embarrassing for the country to allow protesters. You don’t even know what side the protesters are on.”
That's not the context but nice try anyway.

What should have happened to those people who were in attendance at the Hearings is to toss them out which is what happened. And they could have been (and should be) charged with disorderly conduct in some cases.

Protest all you want outside in an open public area. Not in the US Senate Chambers where serious work is underway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pcgeek11

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,672
136
That's not the context but nice try anyway.

What should have happened to those people who were in attendance at the Hearings is to toss them out which is what happened. And they could have been (and should be) charged with disorderly conduct in some cases.

Protest all you want outside in an open public area. Not in the US Senate Chambers where serious work is underway.

Its been happening inside since the making of our country as well.
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,850
3,806
136
That's not the context but nice try anyway.

What should have happened to those people who were in attendance at the Hearings is to toss them out which is what happened. And they could have been (and should be) charged with disorderly conduct in some cases.

Protest all you want outside in an open public area. Not in the US Senate Chambers where serious work is underway.

A serious charade. I'd rather hear what the protesters had to say than Cruz asking Kavanagh what his favorite color is.

They're supposed to be doing the people's work. If they're not going to then we have the right to be heard.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,472
7,996
136
Just another classic sign of a wanna-be dictator desperately wishing he could seize control of the nation to make all his nightmares and crimes vanish into thin air, then force everyone to obey him and his appointed lackeys and everyone will be happy ever after.

The shithead was so full of arrogance, ignorance, hubris when he threw his hat in the ring, thinking he could run things the way he operated his businesses into the ground and/or sold out to Putin and those Russian oligarch creditors of his.

Just look at him now. Running scared trying to hide every single crime he and his kids have committed.

Sad.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,097
32,396
136
That's not the context but nice try anyway.

What should have happened to those people who were in attendance at the Hearings is to toss them out which is what happened. And they could have been (and should be) charged with disorderly conduct in some cases.

Protest all you want outside in an open public area. Not in the US Senate Chambers where serious work is underway.
It is obscene that protesters should be seen/heard by those whose policies they are protesting.
 

dphantom

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2005
4,763
327
126
It is obscene that protesters should be seen/heard by those whose policies they are protesting.
I don't think so, but there is a certain level of decorum that should be considered. There is a time and place for everything.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
It is obscene that protesters should be seen/heard by those whose policies they are protesting.
I am surprised the protestors got anywhere near the hearings. Isn’t it SOP in Washington to just stick protestors in free speech zones well away from where a politician might actually hear them.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,341
53,941
136
What a great lesson in civics. Regardless of political leanings, Sen Sasse presents a great teaching moment for all of us.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlAHS6pT5A4

Sassy, unlike the rest of us, has actual powers of office he could use in a closely divided senate to restrain a president he views as wildly unfit for office. Instead he does nothing.

He is a perfect example of a feckless politician who talks instead of acts. He’s a terrible example for anyone.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,341
53,941
136
I don't think so, but there is a certain level of decorum that should be considered. There is a time and place for everything.

I don’t disagree entirely here. It’s a hard line to draw where you allow dissent but still have to get work done.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,136
6,614
126
That's not the context but nice try anyway.

What should have happened to those people who were in attendance at the Hearings is to toss them out which is what happened. And they could have been (and should be) charged with disorderly conduct in some cases.

Protest all you want outside in an open public area. Not in the US Senate Chambers where serious work is underway.
Serious work. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,629
2,888
136
Yes, protesting should be illegal, then the unindicted co-conspirator couldn't use Twitter for 99%of what he uses it for now.

noun

an expression or declaration of objection, disapproval, or dissent, often in opposition to something a person is powerless to prevent or avoid:
 
  • Like
Reactions: dank69

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,684
136
I remember a member of the Trump entourage blithely remarking how nice it was that there were no protesters in Riyadh...
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,160
31,006
136
That's not the context but nice try anyway.

What should have happened to those people who were in attendance at the Hearings is to toss them out which is what happened. And they could have been (and should be) charged with disorderly conduct in some cases.

Protest all you want outside in an open public area. Not in the US Senate Chambers where serious work is underway.
Since he isn't answering questions what serious work?
 

Veliko

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2011
3,597
127
106
That's not the context but nice try anyway.

What should have happened to those people who were in attendance at the Hearings is to toss them out which is what happened. And they could have been (and should be) charged with disorderly conduct in some cases.

Protest all you want outside in an open public area. Not in the US Senate Chambers where serious work is underway.

What is the context we're missing and what point do you think you're making here?