mikeymikec
Lifer
- May 19, 2011
- 17,574
- 9,262
- 136
The lady is nothing more than a charlatan.
birds of a feather
The lady is nothing more than a charlatan.
Name of sect and link please. I imagine that this sect was rather small if they actually believe pregnant women were possessed by demons.There was a Catholic sect back in the early middle ages that believed that pregnant women were possessed by demons. The Church exterminated the sect root and branch.
They are free to speak out. So far I have yet to hear from any
But will they take the next step and vote Democratic? The above is just a start
- ‘This Is Not of God’: When Anti-Trump Evangelicals Confront Their Brethren (NY Times, May 23, 2018)
- Trump Should be Removed from Office (Christianity Today, December 19, 2019)
- 'God is Going to Have to Forgive Me: Young Evangelicals Speak Out (NY Times, November 1, 2018)
- Anti-Trump Evangelicals are Trying to Figure Out What to do Next (Buzzfeed News, January 24, 2020)
- Opinion: Religion in the U.S. is too complicated for simple rules like ‘evangelicals support Trump’ (Los Angeles Times, January 4, 2020)
- ‘Shame on Him’: Evangelicals Call Out Trump on Syria (NY Times, October 10, 2019)
- Conservative Evangelicals Attempt to Disentangle their Faith from Trumpism (New Yorker, January 8, 2019)
- At a Private Meeting in Illinois, Evangelicals Tried to Save their Movement from Trumpism (New Yorker, April 26, 2018)
I don't know, but my post was in response to yours, which said you had not heard from any evangelicals who have spoke out against Trump. Clearly there are many speaking out.But will they take the next step and vote Democratic? The above is just a start
I am (well, Catholic), but on key issues like abortion, the Democratic party's platform just kills that option for many Christians. So, I swallow hard and vote, because republicans suck so bad on just about everything else.But will they take the next step and vote Democratic? The above is just a start
I've always wanted to know why the Christian concern drops so much as soon as fetus is bornI am (well, Catholic), but on key issues like abortion, the Democratic party's platform just kills that option for many Christians. So, I swallow hard and vote, because republicans suck so bad on just about everything else.
Irony is that banning abortions doesn't prevent abortions, any more than the drug war stopped drug abuse or banning gun ownership would make guns disappear. All any of that ever does is bring govt force into people's lives, with the usual results. But as long as it's other people's live, who cares, amirite? Obviously, the President's spiritual advisor doesn't care. She's calling on God to abort the unborn fetuses of the people she doesn't like.I am (well, Catholic), but on key issues like abortion, the Democratic party's platform just kills that option for many Christians. So, I swallow hard and vote, because republicans suck so bad on just about everything else.
Part of the reason I vote D is because I do care about about person's full life - and want an adequate social Safety net. Anecdotally, I’m not alone. Don't really know why some don’t, it doesn’t make sense. I do understand why they don’t vote D.I've always wanted to know why the Christian concern drops so much as soon as fetus is born
You know, objectively wealth inequality probably kills more unborn and infant children than abortion legality does.I am (well, Catholic), but on key issues like abortion, the Democratic party's platform just kills that option for many Christians. So, I swallow hard and vote, because republicans suck so bad on just about everything else.
And, wealth inequality needs to addressed at a national level - I've believed this for several years. Anyway, just to be clear, I'm not interested in arguing my position on abortion or my voting D even with the current party platform. I was just posting one perspective that I hoped might be useful to some.You know, objectively wealth inequality probably kills more unborn and infant children than abortion legality does.
You don't see the logical fault with that? Not doubting your intent or personal feelings wrt this, but if your argument is 'saving unborn children' and you are presented evidence that one policy supported by the opposition actually does more for your argument than the one you support, doesn't it make sense that you change your stance?And, wealth inequality needs to addressed at a national level - I've believed this for several years. Anyway, just to be clear, I'm not interested in arguing my position on abortion or my voting D even with the current party platform. I was just posting one perspective that I hoped might be useful to some.
You don't see the logical fault with that? Not doubting your intent or personal feelings wrt this, but if your argument is 'saving unborn children' and you are presented evidence that one policy supported by the opposition actually does more for your argument than the one you support, doesn't it make sense that you change your stance?
Understand now?Anyway, just to be clear, I'm not interested in arguing my position on abortion or my voting D even with the current party platform.
Irony is that banning abortions doesn't prevent abortions
Did she include in the sermon were the conservative bible says women should stay silent in church and not speak, or is she using the liberal religious fluid bible were one can be and do whatever they believe or identify as.It is obviously metaphorical if you actually listen to the sermon. It is just a long string of metaphorical nonsense.
Your not one for thinking very much are you?
In 2016 who knew?
The only way what you stated can be true is if you apply that to the 2020 election!
Criticizing a conservative position without lobbing nonsense at liberals was a bridge too far.Did she include in the sermon were the conservative bible says women should stay silent in church and not speak, or is she using the liberal religious fluid bible were one can be and do whatever they believe or identify as.
Oh...that's a new one...it's liberals' fault that women speak in church?Did she include in the sermon were the conservative bible says women should stay silent in church and not speak, or is she using the liberal religious fluid bible were one can be and do whatever they believe or identify as.
Wonder how that conservative christian thing feels about plastic surgery?
Somehow I think it violates one of the 7 deadly sins
Evangelical Christians had already whored themselves out to the golden calf called Trump. We already know what's left of their integrity wallows in the pool of hypocrisy. Now they are selling out what's left of their beliefs by advocating for abortion. For the record, miscarriages are spontaneous abortions. I guess the only reasons evangelicals/conservatives have left for supporting Trump are unqualified conservative judges, hating on people of color and tax cuts for the rich.
BTW - What in the hell is a satanic pregnancy? If the woman is on all fours while having sex?
View attachment 16352
Trump Spiritual Advisor Calls for Miscarriage of 'Satanic Pregnancies'
White said her words had been “taken out of context”time.com