• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Trump nominates Jeff Sessions: A Brand New War on Pot may be at hand

Status
Not open for further replies.

bshole

Diamond Member
  • Couldn't have picked a worse person for the job. If this neanderthal actually goes down the route of enforcement it will be catastrophic for the Republicans. They are way way on the wrong side of this issue. Support for the decriminalization of pot has risen to 60% and is trending upwards. I suspect strongly Trump will muzzle this douche while he pursues policies that will make himself richer. This would be just a distraction

    Marijuana prohibition advocates are giddy at the news Friday that President-elect Donald Trump will nominate Sen. Jeff Sessions to be his administration’s first attorney general.

    The Alabama Republican is one of the nation’s most consistent and quotable foes of pot legalization, and at the helm of the Justice Department he could aggressively enforce federal laws that criminalize possession of pot for any reason outside limited research.

    Sessions has condemned President Barack Obama for saying marijuana is less dangerous than alcohol and for taking a hands-off approach that allowed states to regulate recreational pot markets following passage of 2012 ballot initiatives.

    At an April hearing, Sessions predicted support for state-level legalization would “ripple throughout the entire American citizenry” and said: “We need grown-ups in charge in Washington to say marijuana is not the kind of thing that ought to be legalized, it ought not to be minimized, that it is in fact a very real danger.”

    At the hearing he praised the “Just Say No” anti-drug campaign of former first lady Nancy Reagan and expressed concern about the undoing of years of effort “trying to send that message with clarity that good people don’t smoke marijuana.”


    As attorney general, Sessions could withdraw a 2013 policy document called the Cole Memo that gave states a green light to unfurl retail pot businesses. Or he could intensely scrutinize compliance with priorities the memo said could trigger federal intervention, including interstate smuggling, increases in drugged driving or health consequences.

    http://www.usnews.com/news/national...ns-seen-as-existential-threat-to-pot-industry
  • `
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The GOP is going to go down any day now! Just wait and you'll see.

angry-grumpy-old-man-shaking-his-fist-at-the-world-AKMH7E.jpg
 
That's the consolation prize in CA for a factually-accurate 62% who voted Democratic this year: Suddenly, you get to be "legal" without a card from the state.

I'd get angry watching the news -- straight or stoned. In my group of friends -- all "Liberals" -- I was the only one of five who supported the Proposition 64.

And now we have this cornpone Tory Fuckstick as Attorney General.

When the GOP talks about "freedom," it's about giving a green light to a 2-percenter asshole to screw people over in a zero-sum game. But a woman's body isn't her own: take away her freedom to choose. You won't be able to smoke a doobie in the privacy of your home if Sessions has his way. You'll have a harder time voting -- stating your choice and preferences -- as more of the voting rights legislation erodes.

You can't have the collective freedom to breath clean air or feel safe with your water, if it means regulating the irresponsible who want to pursue their bottom line in dollars.

I believe we can expect some real mischief from the GOP monopoly on government at the federal level. It's going to hurt a lot of people. I've heard Tory Tea Party types advocate utopian (radical) change, and I've heard Sarah Palin disparage "incrementalism" and "compromise."

Maybe we should just have a civil war. But the lines are not going to be so clearly defined as they were on Cemetery Ridge and Gettysburg. It's going to be like Belfast or Syria.
 
Realistically, Sessions can't roll back cannabis legalization. Prohibition can't be enforced w/o the help of local authorities who've been stripped of statutory authority. The Feds don't have the manpower to do it & never will.
 
A case study in the party of small government seeking to go to federal government so they can dictate terms to state governments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ns1
A case study in the party of small government seeking to go to federal government so they can dictate terms to state governments.

Small government freedom is for money, guns, and being able to die of poverty and preventable diseases.

Government is needed to tell you who you sleep with, what you smoke, who you marry, and how you worship.
 
Are we there yet? I ask you who but a brain dead imbecile would appoint a brain dead imbecile to Attorney General. I'm guessing Trump. Can we expect him to go after the Oxycodone morons that elected Trump with equal diligence.
 
That's the consolation prize in CA for a factually-accurate 62% who voted Democratic this year: Suddenly, you get to be "legal" without a card from the state.

I'd get angry watching the news -- straight or stoned. In my group of friends -- all "Liberals" -- I was the only one of five who supported the Proposition 64.

And now we have this cornpone Tory Fuckstick as Attorney General.

When the GOP talks about "freedom," it's about giving a green light to a 2-percenter asshole to screw people over in a zero-sum game. But a woman's body isn't her own: take away her freedom to choose. You won't be able to smoke a doobie in the privacy of your home if Sessions has his way. You'll have a harder time voting -- stating your choice and preferences -- as more of the voting rights legislation erodes.

You can't have the collective freedom to breath clean air or feel safe with your water, if it means regulating the irresponsible who want to pursue their bottom line in dollars.

I believe we can expect some real mischief from the GOP monopoly on government at the federal level. It's going to hurt a lot of people. I've heard Tory Tea Party types advocate utopian (radical) change, and I've heard Sarah Palin disparage "incrementalism" and "compromise."

Maybe we should just have a civil war. But the lines are not going to be so clearly defined as they were on Cemetery Ridge and Gettysburg. It's going to be like Belfast or Syria.
The rub is that its the governments responsibility to be in charge of what best for people. The people know whats best for the people. Just let people live their lives, for the most part.
 
I strongly suspect that Trump had no idea this was one of Session's core beliefs. I'm getting the strong impression that he is picking his proposed cabinet members through a seat of the pants selection process, with next to no due diligence. I doubt this is a battle Trump wants on his watch (but I could be wrong, it's almost impossible to figure out his true position on anything).
 
Last edited:
I strongly suspect that Trump had no idea this was one of Session's core beliefs. I'm getting the strong impression that he is picking his proposed cabinet members through a seat of the pants selection process, with next to no due process. I doubt this is a battle Trump wants on his watch (but I could be wrong, it's almost impossible to figure out his true position on anything).
So, are you there yet? I think Trump will gravitate to megalomaniacs because they above all others will seem sure of themselves and it's certainty the feeble conservative fear brain craves. Conservatives need everything to be black and white and all issues settled. They are emotional cowards. That's why they talk tough to cover it.
 
Since when do those who work in the administration have to have 100% fidelity with the POTUS? Sessions will work for Trump, not the other way around.
 
Since when do those who work in the administration have to have 100% fidelity with the POTUS? Sessions will work for Trump, not the other way around.
I know you would hire a child molester on that basis. He works for you. Your rationalizations aren't just obviously rationalizations, they show signs of being quite insane. You don't put deranged people in charge of government agencies, you fool.
 
I know you would hire a child molester on that basis. He works for you. Your rationalizations aren't just obviously rationalizations, they show signs of being quite insane. You don't put deranged people in charge of government agencies, you fool.
I think you telling anybody that they are deranged is hilarious.
 
Can we wait to see what AG Sessions actually does with regards to pot before going nuts speculating? Sessions will be working for Trump and Trump hasn't said anything about going after Cheech and Chong.
 
Can we wait to see what AG Sessions actually does with regards to pot before going nuts speculating? Sessions will be working for Trump and Trump hasn't said anything about going after Cheech and Chong.

That was GWB and he only persecuted (intentional use of that word) one of them.

http://www.mapinc.org/newstcl/v06/n849/a03.html?176

Rather than adopt a wait and hope approach I'd much rather have our Senators inquire in depth on this issue at his confirmation hearings and get Sessions pinned down to some specific promises. Since he is a fellow senator chances are they will treat him with kid gloves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top