Trump more involved in stopping FBI HQ move than previously known, emails show

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,272
5,326
136
Scumbag President who is supported by shithead followers wastes tax payer money to block out competitors to his shitty hotel


http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/10/18/combined.pdf



"New documents provided to the Oversight Committee indicate that President Trump met personally with you, the FBI, and White House officials on January 24, 2018, where he was directly involved with the decision to abandon the long-term relocation plan and instead move ahead with the more expensive proposal to construct a new building on the same site, and thereby prevent Trump Hotel competitors from acquiring the land,"

full article
Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump was more instrumental than previously known in scrapping plans to move the FBI headquarters out of Washington to the DC suburbs, according to newly released internal government emails.

The move could have financial benefits for the President, whose own hotel is located a block away, critics say.
The documents were released Thursday by House Democrats in a letter to General Services Administrator Emily Murphy that suggests she misled Congress about the President's involvement.
"New documents provided to the Oversight Committee indicate that President Trump met personally with you, the FBI, and White House officials on January 24, 2018, where he was directly involved with the decision to abandon the long-term relocation plan and instead move ahead with the more expensive proposal to construct a new building on the same site, and thereby prevent Trump Hotel competitors from acquiring the land," states the letter by Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and other senior Democrats.
CNN is reaching out to the White House and GSA for comment.
The days following the White House meeting included efforts to make the decision to keep the FBI in Washington official, specifically referencing Trump's wishes.
Just one day after the meeting with Trump in the Oval Office, GSA's acting chief of staff, Brennan Hart, sent an email to Joseph Lai, a special assistant to the President, to emphasize the decision had been made not to relocate the FBI headquarters.
Days later, GSA's acting general counsel, Jack St. John, suggested the need to get "something in writing" from the FBI and Justice Department that solidified what had been agreed upon in the meeting with Trump.

Hart responded in an email, "Ideally, I think it would first recap the oval meeting with what POTUS directed everyone to do then ask Emily [Murphy] to execute POTUS's orders."
On January 28, Hart also sent an email to officials in the Office of Legislative Affairs discussing Trump's role that said, "GSA is going to hold our ground on funding source and that it is a demolition/new construction per the President's instructions."
Questions about Murphy's testimony
The documents obtained by House Democrats are a preview of the kinds of oversight Democrats might escalate if they win the House majority in November.
Democrats have "serious concerns" about the move on the FBI plan to "replace it with a more costly plan to keep the current location, demolish the existing building, and construct a new facility on the same site," the letter states.
The have also raised questions about why the GSA chief was not more forthcoming with Congress about the White House's role. In April, Murphy did not disclose she'd met with the President about the project when asked by Rep. Mike Quigley, an Illinois Democrat, during a congressional hearing if the President or anyone at the White House was involved in the discussions about the future of the FBI building.

The General Services Administration's inspector general later said Murphy's testimony had been "incomplete."
"We found that Administrator Murphy's testimony before the House Appropriations Committee, Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee on April 17, 2018, was incomplete and may have left the misleading impression that she had no discussions with the President or senior White House officials in the decision-making process about the project," the IG said in a report in August.
Democrats accuse Murphy in their letter of concealing valuable information from Congress.
"Your meetings with the White House came to light only after direct evidence emerged, including a photograph of you meeting with President Trump in the Oval Office, along with other White House, Justice Department, and FBI officials," the Democrats wrote in the letter Thursday.

Democrats on the committee argue that Trump had a clear interest in the FBI property being developed before he was President, but after he became President and was not allowed to invest in the project, his interest became ensuring no other developer could buy the property, convert it and compete with the Trump hotel.
"Many years before becoming President, Donald Trump expressed interest in the FBI headquarters moving out of Washington, D.C. so he could acquire the land on Pennsylvania Avenue and redevelop the property, which is directly across the street from the Trump International Hotel. However, after he was sworn in as President—and became ineligible as a federal employee to obtain the property—he reportedly became 'dead opposed' to the government selling the property, which would have allowed commercial developers to compete directly with the Trump Hotel," Cummings and his colleagues wrote.
CNN's Greg Wallace contributed to this report.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/18/politics/trump-fbi-building/index.html
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,984
9,396
146
Hey look. A bunch of corrupt assholes continue to be corrupt assholes. Meanwhile Zinke fired the DOI IG, who is investigating 14 separate corruption complaints against him, and didn't even tell her. She found out this morning when the news broke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: darkswordsman17

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
51,261
43,512
136
Maybe the next Congress will consider prosecuting people who lie to it.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,117
29,275
136
Hey look. A bunch of corrupt assholes continue to be corrupt assholes. Meanwhile Zinke fired the DOI IG, who is investigating 14 separate corruption complaints against him, and didn't even tell her. She found out this morning when the news broke.

This is the winning and draining of the swamp right?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,337
53,928
136
Wait so building a new building on the same property is more expensive then building a new building on a different property?

That would make sense. If you are building a new building on the same site you presumably have to lease replacement office space while you're doing it.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,093
32,392
136
Plus you can sell the old lot that seems to be primo realty to offset the cost of acquiring the new lot.
 

paperfist

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2000
6,539
286
126
www.the-teh.com
That would make sense. If you are building a new building on the same site you presumably have to lease replacement office space while you're doing it.

Guess it depends on the size of the site. I figured they’d build new before tearing down old, but maybe there’s not enough space.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,472
7,996
136
Just business as usual in the Trump era. Can't wait for the Dems to take over the House and have them take apart the Trump White House of Corruption and Shame brick by corrupted brick. If the Dems can round up McConnell and Ryan in the dragnet as being complicit with Trump's malfeasance it would be some stone cold icing on the cake served up with a Rule of Law cherry on top.

If only...................
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,984
9,396
146
Guess it depends on the size of the site. I figured they’d build new before tearing down old, but maybe there’s not enough space.
If you check it on Google maps it's the full block. There would be no room anywhere for them to build. Full temporary relocation would be require as they tear down and rebuild.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paperfist

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,611
30,887
146
Remember when that repeat-arsonist Darryl Issa of the Oversight Committee was constantly up in Obama's shit about every little mundane piece of minutia, claiming his administration was in constant violation?

Whatever happened to that guy...up until ~now, anyway?
 

JTsyo

Lifer
Nov 18, 2007
11,981
1,100
126
Wait so building a new building on the same property is more expensive then building a new building on a different property?
Not just hat but it wouldn't be able to house as many as the one they had planned. More money, less room.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paperfist

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,160
31,006
136
Remember when that repeat-arsonist Darryl Issa of the Oversight Committee was constantly up in Obama's shit about every little mundane piece of minutia, claiming his administration was in constant violation?

Whatever happened to that guy...up until ~now, anyway?
Because when the Negro was in charge wearing a tan suit in the Oval Office was a violation.

Times have changed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KMFJD

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,833
2,620
136
If Emily Murphy doesn't end up in prison for deliberately and repeatedly lying to Congress on this issue then their is no justice. She repeatedly swore up and down that the request to stay came from the FBI and that the White House and in particular the POTUS had nothing to do with it.

Such utter rank corruption-kill this deal because it will negatively impact the income of the Trump Hotel a block away. A hotel that His Donaldship continues to hold a controlling interest in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: darkswordsman17