I wouldn't pop the champagne just yet ...
While this latest case does seriously increase those chances beyond what was already in the news (1-6, voting stuff, etc.), there are still some MAJOR hurdles still to come.
The first (and biggest IMO) is any reference to classified material in any of the court proceedings. The affidavit both downplays and upsells the existence of it. On one hand there's a footnote stating that the info need not be classified, but also references to precedents where courts held that classified info was covered under the relevant section of code. Also, they went to great detail to list out the counts/pages of each type in order to get the judge to grant the warrant. If it does end up that DoJ wants to introduce it, they just can't enter it as exhibit A-Z. Each piece has to be reviewed AND APPROVED by the owning agency. If there's a HUMINT piece in there, CIA can just say "nah, we're good with that not being revealed any more" and it's not getting in. Then even if the agencies agree and it does get in, you enter a whole new world of hurt regarding who can/will get access to it. Have to have a defense member that is cleared. Takes time. Have to worry about members of the court as well. What about the jury? The extra procedural steps are an enormous time drain. Now, if the DoJ doesn't choose to use it to avoid all that (which is where I think they're going) you run the PR risk of a huge chorus of "See, there wasn't any classified info in the boxes. It's all a witch-hunt blah blah" from 40% of the country. Of course that shouldn't matter in the case itself, but ...
The second is where the trial (if any) will be held. It's either gonna be DC or FL, but there will be a fight over that with FPOTUS obviously wanting FL.
The third is the jury, which weighs heavily (but not entirely) on issue #2. With FL you're almost guaranteed to get a sympathetic MAGAt on the panel. Enough said. With DC, you're almost assuredly going to get a very blue jury (an argument they'll use in #2). Even then, there's still a chance that one member isn't buying it for whatever reasons. This isn't the Manafort case by any stretch. That was a fairly obvious slam dunk with $$$ and paperwork trails. This will be one of the most complex criminal cases, both in previously unexplored legal issues related to the office, and in battling through the bullshit that will be thrown up as a distraction.
For the record, I think he will now be indicted for something related to this but either won't be convicted, or won't serve any sentence due to legal challenges dragging it out beyond his lifetime. Either way, he'll still be getting away with it. And fundraising all the while, which is his main goal anyway.