• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Trump Lovers and Voters: Would you be happy if...

Would you be happy with a divided country?

  • Yes The Confederacy of Trump would make me happy!

  • No.. we have to have the country united under 1 flag!

Results are only viewable after voting.
Indus

Indus

Lifer
If we divided the country and you had no liberals, no mexicans, no moderates, no anchor babies and everyone you hated would leave for another part of the country, would you be happy?
 
Last edited:
Subyman said:
Who would support them then? 🙂
Click to expand...

compuwiz, michal1980 to name a few but according to them, they have a lot of people on their side..

So why not be happy with the country they claim they want to have? Or is hating someone ingrained and necessary for them?
 
Indus said:
compuwiz, michal1980 to name a few but according to them, they have a lot of people on their side..

So why not be happy with the country they claim they want to have? Or is hating someone ingrained and necessary for them?
Click to expand...

The thread is about Trump, but I just heard Cruz's latest news-rant.

The candidates are a reflection not only of how their constituents think, but whether they think clearly. Now, this will elicit criticism from our opposition brethren, but it only requires an example: their opposition to compromise.

I've got my own secret thoughts, because -- MLK's ideals notwithstanding, I've got a John Brown streak when I get impatient and angry. And contrary to JB, I'm waiting for the opposition to raid Harper's Ferry so to speak.

Is there any comparison with Malheur? I can find all sorts of reasons to deride even that comparison.

And when it comes to the thought I've had of selling my Texas state-of-birth to Raul Castro for a nickel while offering to pay postage, there are all those urbanized blue-spots on the map.

I also saw a letter-to-editor in today's LA Times, in which a long-time Republican says he will refuse to vote in the election because he's disgusted with the GOP front-runners. But if you're John McCain sitting in Hanoi Hilton, and they give you two choices of rotten rice or good rice with fried cockroaches, you're probably better off with the cockroaches. More protein, ya see.

Of course, if he merely stays home on election day, that's one less of "them," boding a better outcome for "us." I just continue to be dumbfounded about the Tea Party imagination.

It's big.
 
Indus said:
If we divided the country and you had no liberals, no mexicans, no moderates, no anchor babies and everyone you hated would leave for another part of the country, would you be happy?
Click to expand...

We don't hate those people. You're projecting your hate for conservatives.
 
Indus said:
If we divided the country and you had no liberals, no mexicans, no moderates, no anchor babies and everyone you hated would leave for another part of the country, would you be happy?
Click to expand...

We already have that. It's called Canada and it's lovely place. Australia is like that too. They're filled with liberals, but they generally don't tolerate bullshit from criminals and illegal immigrants. If you show up on the shores of Australia in a boat, the coast guard will turn you away. You can't go back? Tough shit. Tell Davy Jones I said hello.

Canada doesn't even let documented Americans into the country if they have certain things on their record. Comedian Joey Diaz is not allowed into Canada to do comedy shows because he has a weapons felony on his record. In contrast, the US actively encourages people to have weapons felonies on their records. See: Fast & Furious weapons scandal.
 
I might vote for Trump if Clinton takes the Dem nomination, just for the lulz/anti-establishment message. I'm fine with Hispanics for the most part. I don't want them leaving the country.
 
Indus said:
If we divided the country and you had no liberals, no mexicans, no moderates, no anchor babies and everyone you hated would leave for another part of the country, would you be happy?
Click to expand...

No.

I'm not a Trump lover, but I'd vote for him before Hillary or Bernie.
 
HamburgerBoy said:
I might vote for Trump if Clinton takes the Dem nomination, just for the lulz/anti-establishment message. I'm fine with Hispanics for the most part. I don't want them leaving the country.
Click to expand...
Apparently Trump likes hispanics as well. He was the only politician wanting to address to rape epidemic along the southern border. Candidates like Sanders and Clinton thought that protecting hispanic women was racist.

It gets even more hilarious when the liberal media tries to spin the story.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-completely-misread-fusion-article-about-immigration-and-rape/
mediaite article said:
While it’s possible, as the Fusion article reports, that some of these rapes are being committed by fellow migrants, the larger problem they are describing stems from gangs that control territory south of the border forcing women to “pay” for their passage with sex. That does not mean, as Trump has never stopped insisting, that Mexico is somehow sending all of its “rapists” to the United States.
Click to expand...

Right. And which candidate wants to tighten the border controls so there would be fewer cases of human smuggling and thus fewer cases of morally questionable forced prostitution? Oh, that's right, it was Trump. Sanders are Clinton are both supporters of keeping the border operated by these Mexican rape and prostitution gangs.
 
Indus said:
compuwiz, michal1980 to name a few but according to them, they have a lot of people on their side..

So why not be happy with the country they claim they want to have? Or is hating someone ingrained and necessary for them?
Click to expand...

Your projecting some deep down bullshit.

Where did I say I hate Mexicans?

Am I against ILLEGAL immigration? 100%.

Am I against hypocritical liberals? 100% (for example, the same liberals bitch about low wages for American workers have no problems will millions of illegals lowering wages)

anchor babies? I don't belive I stated an opinion either way.

And finally, I don't support the blow hard trump.
 
glenn1 said:
I guess all those liberals will need to figure out how to support their key deadbeat constituents on their own without "collective action problem" excuses.
Click to expand...

Hasn't it been proven time and again that Red Staters/Republican Voters represent a far greater percentage of Government Aid/Welfare recipients?
 
michal1980 said:
Your projecting some deep down bullshit.

Where did I say I hate Mexicans?

Am I against ILLEGAL immigration? 100%.

Am I against hypocritical liberals? 100% (for example, the same liberals bitch about low wages for American workers have no problems will millions of illegals lowering wages)

anchor babies? I don't belive I stated an opinion either way.

And finally, I don't support the blow hard trump.
Click to expand...
Other than that he was spot on.
 
glenn1 said:
I guess all those liberals will need to figure out how to support their key deadbeat constituents on their own without "collective action problem" excuses.
Click to expand...

And I guess that insecure rightwing zealots need to justify the actions of the No Job Creators by blaming the victims of such actions for their plight.

It's not like working people do the hiring, firing, laying off, automating, consolidating & offshoring is it? It's not like they profited from enormous over extension of credit that was the Ownership Society or make money from corporate inversions is it?

Hardly. They just try to get & hold a stable job to pay the rent & feed the kids.

Which is increasingly difficult given the labor glut created in hiring fewer & fewer americans every chance given & in the rollercoaster ride of the bubble economy that financial swashbucklers promote & provide.

The titans of finance just give the little guys a few years of breathing room between the beat downs, each more severe than the previous.
 
feralkid said:
Hasn't it been proven time and again that Red Staters/Republican Voters represent a far greater percentage of Government Aid/Welfare recipients?
Click to expand...

Has it? Note that just because a state consistently "goes red" doesn't mean that it's Republican voters actually receiving government welfare. Show me where it's specifically shown that Republicans are disproportionately represented among welfare recipients.
 
Spungo said:
We already have that. It's called Canada and it's lovely place. Australia is like that too. They're filled with liberals, but they generally don't tolerate bullshit from criminals and illegal immigrants. If you show up on the shores of Australia in a boat, the coast guard will turn you away. You can't go back? Tough shit. Tell Davy Jones I said hello.

Canada doesn't even let documented Americans into the country if they have certain things on their record. Comedian Joey Diaz is not allowed into Canada to do comedy shows because he has a weapons felony on his record. In contrast, the US actively encourages people to have weapons felonies on their records. See: Fast & Furious weapons scandal.
Click to expand...

DUI = no Canada for you.

Most countries have far stronger immigration laws than we do.
 
Spungo said:
We already have that. It's called Canada and it's lovely place. Australia is like that too. They're filled with liberals, but they generally don't tolerate bullshit from criminals and illegal immigrants. If you show up on the shores of Australia in a boat, the coast guard will turn you away. You can't go back? Tough shit. Tell Davy Jones I said hello.

Canada doesn't even let documented Americans into the country if they have certain things on their record. Comedian Joey Diaz is not allowed into Canada to do comedy shows because he has a weapons felony on his record. In contrast, the US actively encourages people to have weapons felonies on their records. See: Fast & Furious weapons scandal.
Click to expand...

no liberals, no mexicans, no moderates, no anchor babies

Canada has all of them and yes it is a lovely place
 
HamburgerBoy said:
Has it? Note that just because a state consistently "goes red" doesn't mean that it's Republican voters actually receiving government welfare. Show me where it's specifically shown that Republicans are disproportionately represented among welfare recipients.
Click to expand...

Oh, geez, he probably drove past a trailer park once, while passing through a red state. 😀
 
LegendKiller said:
DUI = no Canada for you.

Most countries have far stronger immigration laws than we do.
Click to expand...

No, pretty sure that's not true, you can get into Canada even through you have had a DUI
The US can and has refused entrance because of DUI, but most of the time they will let you through
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top