Yeah..How long until Trump's juvenile and asinine tweet in response to this mature piece of writing.
Yeah..How long until Trump's juvenile and asinine tweet in response to this mature piece of writing.
Fanatical Meat
Lifer
- Feb 4, 2009
- 34,553
- 15,766
- 136
I sort of like this, be great if a shit ton of people started doing it.
I’m perfectly fine with this inflating the President ego because his book sales increase.
I’m perfectly fine with this inflating the President ego because his book sales increase.
Last edited:
Remember when Putin's "Little Green Men" showed up in Crimea?
thehill.com
The whole point of having no insignia is to avoid accountability, isn't it? Who are these guys?
Unidentified military personnel extend perimeter around the White House
Military personnel in Washington, D.C., at least some of whom were not wearing identifiers, extended the perimeter around the White House on Wednesday, blocking off access to LaFayette Square, wher…
thehill.com
The whole point of having no insignia is to avoid accountability, isn't it? Who are these guys?
hal2kilo
Lifer
- Feb 24, 2009
- 23,418
- 10,305
- 136
There's a whole lot more.
This part stands out.
“Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people — does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership,”
hal2kilo
Lifer
- Feb 24, 2009
- 23,418
- 10,305
- 136
And yet the party appears to be late. The idiots in the Pub party still support the idiot more completely than any Republican before, 85%. There's the real problem.
Fanatical Meat
Lifer
- Feb 4, 2009
- 34,553
- 15,766
- 136
His words are appreciated but we need actions. Will Mattis stand on a stage with Biden?
IronWing
No Lifer
- Jul 20, 2001
- 69,010
- 26,889
- 136
What's Erik Prince doing these days?Remember when Putin's "Little Green Men" showed up in Crimea?
Unidentified military personnel extend perimeter around the White House
Military personnel in Washington, D.C., at least some of whom were not wearing identifiers, extended the perimeter around the White House on Wednesday, blocking off access to LaFayette Square, wher…
The whole point of having no insignia is to avoid accountability, isn't it? Who are these guys?
zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 110,568
- 29,179
- 146
He'd probably like to be part of it all. I won't speculate that he is. It's just weird that some of these guys bear no insignia. That's highly abby-normal.
woolfe9998
Lifer
- Apr 8, 2013
- 16,188
- 14,091
- 136
Trump's armed thugs showing up at protests:
www.cnn.com
I disagree that these people are "an emerging incarnation of extremism that seems to defy easy categorization."
I think it's quite easy to "categorize" them.
They are the Sturmabteilung.
Read up on your history. This is no joke.
Heavily armed extremist movement gains traction
Benjamin Ryan Teeter was at his home in Hampstead, N.C., when the call to action came. It was an alert from the heart of the raging protests in Minneapolis, posted on an online forum by a fellow member of the Boogaloo movement, a loosely knit group of heavily armed, anti-government extremists.
www.cnn.com
I disagree that these people are "an emerging incarnation of extremism that seems to defy easy categorization."
I think it's quite easy to "categorize" them.
They are the Sturmabteilung.
Read up on your history. This is no joke.
i wish that was funny, but since you asked. as of a few months ago, he is working with Project Veritas and recruiting ex-spies to infiltrate liberal groups.
Erik Prince Recruits Ex-Spies to Help Infiltrate Liberal Groups (Published 2020)
Mr. Prince, a contractor close to the Trump administration, contacted veteran spies for operations by Project Veritas, the conservative group known for conducting stings on news organizations and other groups.
JEDIYoda
Lifer
- Jul 13, 2005
- 33,981
- 3,318
- 126
The Sturmabteilung , literally Storm Detachment, was the Nazi Party's original paramilitary wing. It played a significant role in Adolf Hitler's rise to power in the 1920s and 1930s. Its primary purposes were providing protection for Nazi rallies and assemblies, disrupting the meetings of opposing parties, fighting against the paramilitary units of the opposing parties, especially the Red Front Fighters League (Rotfrontkämpferbund) of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD), and intimidating Romani, trade unionists, and, especially, Jews – for instance, during the 1933 Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses.Trump's armed thugs showing up at protests:
Heavily armed extremist movement gains traction
Benjamin Ryan Teeter was at his home in Hampstead, N.C., when the call to action came. It was an alert from the heart of the raging protests in Minneapolis, posted on an online forum by a fellow member of the Boogaloo movement, a loosely knit group of heavily armed, anti-government extremists.
I disagree that these people are "an emerging incarnation of extremism that seems to defy easy categorization."
I think it's quite easy to "categorize" them.
They are the Sturmabteilung.
Read up on your history. This is no joke.
pauldun170
Diamond Member
- Sep 26, 2011
- 9,133
- 5,072
- 136
I don't know why but the "How was babby formed" video plays when I see that Turmp photo op. How is Bibble hand? Yes is bibble. Then his random gibberish.
GoodRevrnd
Diamond Member
- Dec 27, 2001
- 6,803
- 581
- 126
Why did you say Broom Hilda was a great administrator then? We both know about the Clinton crime bill supported by centrist liberals, including black liberal leadership, and the liberal rule in many cities where this all goes down.
QUESTION: But your—you and your family have been personally and politically responsible for policies that have caused Health and Human Services disasters in impoverished communities of color (inaudible) the domestic and international War on Drugs that you championed as First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State. And so I just want to know how you feel about your role in that violence and how you plan to reverse it?
HILLARY CLINTON: Well, you know, I feel strongly, which is why I had this town hall today. And as the questions and comments from people illustrated, there’s a lot of concern that we need to rethink and redo what we did in response to a different set of problems.
And you know, in life, in politics, in government—you name it—you’ve got to constantly be asking yourself, “Is this working? Is this not?” and if it’s not, what do we do better? And that’s what I’m trying to do now on drugs, on mass incarceration, on police behavior and criminal justice reform. Because I do think that there was a different set of concerns back in the ‘80s and the early ‘90s. And now I believe that we have to look at the world as it is today and try and figure out what will work now.
QUESTION: Yeah. And I would offer that it didn’t work then, either, and that those policies were actually extensions of white supremacist violence against communities of color. And so I just think I want to hear a little bit about that, about the fact that actually while—
HILLARY CLINTON: Well, I’m not sure—
For most policy makers and voters, the intent wasn’t malicious in that way. It’s also difficult to conflate some of the reasons that cause the disparity here at all with racism unless the intent from the policy was bad. How is it racist that there is more police presence in areas with lots of violent crime? How is it racist that black people carry drugs outdoors more than white people in part due to lower SES?
You’re not even showing any data to back up your arguments so that’s rich.
I gave you a British news source, yet you’re still unhappy over their verdict. The reason why they didn’t use more recent data (as if almost 3 decades up to 2008 saying it’s about half isn’t enough, sheesh) is because that data isn’t as readily available. You apparently didn’t read what they said or purposely omitted it:
“Alternative statistics from the FBI are more up to date but include many crimes where the killer’s race is not recorded. These numbers tell a similar story.”
Despite the unknown offenders, you can extrapolate based on victims alone easily, since homicides are mostly a within race offense.
2018 (most recent without being preliminary)
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u....018/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-1.xls
It’s dropping for everyone and again, the article states plainly that the more recent years have many unknowns for offenders, so “Unknown” is comprising a significant portion of the total percent.
All of that shit is answered in the article. You just don’t like the verdict.
And right after that, they refute it. It’s included in the verdict to render no mass discrimination found.
It's not a coincidence that they match up year after year.
Where’s your data? You want the numbers to shift clearly, but you can’t change the facts. From 1980 to 2008, 93% of black homicides were committed by other blacks.
Seriously? You’re just making shit up as you go.
I’m not sure how both you and alien came to the conclusion that I’m trying to argue that men are oppressed and have mass sexist discrimination happening to them.
The point I’m driving across is consistency. My stance has been both racial differences and sex differences aren’t oppression (well, drug war arguably has been bad enough, but intentions weren’t malicious by many policy makers) and aren’t indicative of mass sexism or racism. The woke liberal stance has been that men don’t experience anything bad in the system, yet I’m suppose to take seriously this idea that the racial differences are indicative of mass racism and oppression.
The reaction every time is to adjust factors for gender to explain away and ignore whatever is unexplained but never for racial differences. Why? A lot of the data is left raw with people eating it up despite it not adjusting for age demographics, violent crime, and SES.
There are unexplained disparities with gender, too. And as I’ve repeated over again and again, it doesn’t even register. Anyway, it's obvious gender and racial differences are a function of mostly how much crime a group does. If a given group has more little shits, then they'll get saddled with worse generalizations.
But actually, the correlation becomes broken if there’s a black jury. They start convicting whites at a higher rate than whites do blacks, and they allow black defendants to get off the hook more so than whites do with other whites. But of course, that’s not racism, right? And ironically, white SJW juries end up becoming their worst enemy, skewering any white defendant if there’s a POC victim.
Are Juries Fair Research | PDF | Jury Trial | Verdict
Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site.
"Concerns about the appearance of jury fairness are likely to arise in courts where all-White juries try substantial numbers of BME defendants or try White defendants accused of racial crimes against BME victims."
"White jurors at Nottingham were significantly more likely to convict the White defendant when he was accused of assaulting a BME victim (61%) than when he was accused of assaulting a White victim (4%)."
Why did you say Broom Hilda was a great administrator then? We both know about the Clinton crime bill supported by centrist liberals, including black liberal leadership, and the liberal rule in many cities where this all goes down.
QUESTION: But your—you and your family have been personally and politically responsible for policies that have caused Health and Human Services disasters in impoverished communities of color (inaudible) the domestic and international War on Drugs that you championed as First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State. And so I just want to know how you feel about your role in that violence and how you plan to reverse it?
HILLARY CLINTON: Well, you know, I feel strongly, which is why I had this town hall today. And as the questions and comments from people illustrated, there’s a lot of concern that we need to rethink and redo what we did in response to a different set of problems.
And you know, in life, in politics, in government—you name it—you’ve got to constantly be asking yourself, “Is this working? Is this not?” and if it’s not, what do we do better? And that’s what I’m trying to do now on drugs, on mass incarceration, on police behavior and criminal justice reform. Because I do think that there was a different set of concerns back in the ‘80s and the early ‘90s. And now I believe that we have to look at the world as it is today and try and figure out what will work now.
QUESTION: Yeah. And I would offer that it didn’t work then, either, and that those policies were actually extensions of white supremacist violence against communities of color. And so I just think I want to hear a little bit about that, about the fact that actually while—
HILLARY CLINTON: Well, I’m not sure—
For most policy makers and voters, the intent wasn’t malicious in that way. It’s also difficult to conflate some of the reasons that cause the disparity here at all with racism unless the intent from the policy was bad. How is it racist that there is more police presence in areas with lots of violent crime? How is it racist that black people carry drugs outdoors more than white people in part due to lower SES?
You’re not even showing any data to back up your arguments so that’s rich.
I gave you a British news source, yet you’re still unhappy over their verdict. The reason why they didn’t use more recent data (as if almost 3 decades up to 2008 saying it’s about half isn’t enough, sheesh) is because that data isn’t as readily available. You apparently didn’t read what they said or purposely omitted it:
“Alternative statistics from the FBI are more up to date but include many crimes where the killer’s race is not recorded. These numbers tell a similar story.”
Despite the unknown offenders, you can extrapolate based on victims alone easily, since homicides are mostly a within race offense.
2018 (most recent without being preliminary)
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u....018/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-1.xls
It’s dropping for everyone and again, the article states plainly that the more recent years have many unknowns for offenders, so “Unknown” is comprising a significant portion of the total percent.
All of that shit is answered in the article. You just don’t like the verdict.
And right after that, they refute it. It’s included in the verdict to render no mass discrimination found.
It's not a coincidence that they match up year after year.
Where’s your data? You want the numbers to shift clearly, but you can’t change the facts. From 1980 to 2008, 93% of black homicides were committed by other blacks.
Seriously? You’re just making shit up as you go.
I’m not sure how both you and alien came to the conclusion that I’m trying to argue that men are oppressed and have mass sexist discrimination happening to them.
The point I’m driving across is consistency. My stance has been both racial differences and sex differences aren’t oppression (well, drug war arguably has been bad enough, but intentions weren’t malicious by many policy makers) and aren’t indicative of mass sexism or racism. The woke liberal stance has been that men don’t experience anything bad in the system, yet I’m suppose to take seriously this idea that the racial differences are indicative of mass racism and oppression.
The reaction every time is to adjust factors for gender to explain away and ignore whatever is unexplained but never for racial differences. Why? A lot of the data is left raw with people eating it up despite it not adjusting for age demographics, violent crime, and SES.
There are unexplained disparities with gender, too. And as I’ve repeated over again and again, it doesn’t even register. Anyway, it's obvious gender and racial differences are a function of mostly how much crime a group does. If a given group has more little shits, then they'll get saddled with worse generalizations.
But actually, the correlation becomes broken if there’s a black jury. They start convicting whites at a higher rate than whites do blacks, and they allow black defendants to get off the hook more so than whites do with other whites. But of course, that’s not racism, right? And ironically, white SJW juries end up becoming their worst enemy, skewering any white defendant if there’s a POC victim.
Are Juries Fair Research | PDF | Jury Trial | Verdict
Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site.www.scribd.com
"Concerns about the appearance of jury fairness are likely to arise in courts where all-White juries try substantial numbers of BME defendants or try White defendants accused of racial crimes against BME victims."
"White jurors at Nottingham were significantly more likely to convict the White defendant when he was accused of assaulting a BME victim (61%) than when he was accused of assaulting a White victim (4%)."
The very fact that you are here trying to argue that there is no racism shows that you have already ignored the indisputable proof that is already out there. Why are you asking for proof of what has already been given and proven time and time again? Hell, it was all right there in front of you during all your googling to try and prove your argument because for every 1 article that supports your racist view, there are 10 to 20 that prove otherwise. But you chose not to acknowledge any of it. You don't even understand that the very statistics that you are trying to use are skewed in favor of whites and against blacks due to the racism that is in the entire system, from government all the way down the the very citizens.
Last edited:
Holy shit!...Remind me to check the current weather in Hell.
edition.cnn.com
'You just don't do that, Mr. President': Televangelist Pat Robertson condemns Trump's 'law and order' response to protests | CNN Politics
Televangelist Pat Robertson on Tuesday condemned President Donald Trump's response to nationwide protests over the death of George Floyd and police brutality, saying "you just don't do that, Mr. President"
George Bush weighs in:
abc13.com
George W. Bush releases rare public statement on George Floyd protests
He did not refer specifically toward Trump, but he called the harassment toward African American protesters "a shocking failure."
Fanatical Meat
Lifer
- Feb 4, 2009
- 34,553
- 15,766
- 136
Holy shit!...Remind me to check the current weather in Hell.
'You just don't do that, Mr. President': Televangelist Pat Robertson condemns Trump's 'law and order' response to protests | CNN Politics
Televangelist Pat Robertson on Tuesday condemned President Donald Trump's response to nationwide protests over the death of George Floyd and police brutality, saying "you just don't do that, Mr. President"
Yeah, cnn links on my phone suck so I didn’t read it but from what I heard Robertson appears to be following the same logic as my Pastor.
Everyone including the President has a right to go to Church. No one has the right to remove a bunch of others at the Church so they can attend.
feralkid
Lifer
- Jan 28, 2002
- 16,467
- 4,534
- 136
- Jan 2, 2001
- 24,983
- 4,314
- 136
Oh, wait! No need for all this ado over the clearing out of the protesters and how it was done. It wasn't intentional, just a coincidence that the area cleared was the path he took to get to the church.
At least according to Barr:
"Barr said it was a coincidence that law enforcement cleared the area later used for the President's walk to the nearby St. John's Episcopal Church, where he posed for a photo."
Just a coincidence.
Right.
www.cnn.com
At least according to Barr:
"Barr said it was a coincidence that law enforcement cleared the area later used for the President's walk to the nearby St. John's Episcopal Church, where he posed for a photo."
Just a coincidence.
Right.
Attorney general defends tactics used to push back protesters near White House
A memorial service to honor George Floyd, a black man who pleaded that he couldn't breathe while he was held down with a knee by a former police officer, will be held in Minneapolis, as protesters continue to rally across the US following his killing.
Brainonska511
Lifer
- Dec 10, 2005
- 24,050
- 6,848
- 136
Being a "coincidence" doesn't make what happened better. I think it makes it even worse because then you were moving those people for no reason.Oh, wait! No need for all this ado over the clearing out of the protesters and how it was done. It wasn't intentional, just a coincidence that the area cleared was the path he took to get to the church.
At least according to Barr:
"Barr said it was a coincidence that law enforcement cleared the area later used for the President's walk to the nearby St. John's Episcopal Church, where he posed for a photo."
Just a coincidence.
Right.
Attorney general defends tactics used to push back protesters near White House
A memorial service to honor George Floyd, a black man who pleaded that he couldn't breathe while he was held down with a knee by a former police officer, will be held in Minneapolis, as protesters continue to rally across the US following his killing.
ch33zw1z
Lifer
- Nov 4, 2004
- 37,760
- 18,039
- 146
Oh, wait! No need for all this ado over the clearing out of the protesters and how it was done. It wasn't intentional, just a coincidence that the area cleared was the path he took to get to the church.
At least according to Barr:
"Barr said it was a coincidence that law enforcement cleared the area later used for the President's walk to the nearby St. John's Episcopal Church, where he posed for a photo."
Just a coincidence.
Right.
Attorney general defends tactics used to push back protesters near White House
A memorial service to honor George Floyd, a black man who pleaded that he couldn't breathe while he was held down with a knee by a former police officer, will be held in Minneapolis, as protesters continue to rally across the US following his killing.
Just insulting to the average american at this point.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 9K
-
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 7K
-
Facebook
Twitter