- May 19, 2011
- 17,708
- 9,571
- 136
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/pol...rs-morgan-how-the-world-reacted-a3750156.html
I haven't seen the interview in full, but on the topic of him re-tweeting Britain First's videos, I saw this on news sites:
Piers Morgan claimed that he had actually apologised (apparently based on the strength of this quote). I guess that Piers Morgan has insufficient insight to spot a fake apology.
To anyone who attempts to argue this point: An honest and moral person apologises because they want to atone for something they have done wrong. It's not about who is offended by it, or giving an apology because someone asked for one. It would be like me calling you a fucking wanker then saying "I'm sorry if you were offended by that". Either I think I shouldn't have called you a fucking wanker or I don't. Apologising for your offence is suggesting that I'm apologising for your opinion, which makes no sense.
The fact that Donald Trump, as the US's supreme representative, helped voice one of the most bigoted and awful organisations currently in existence without allegedly having the vaguest clue who they were, he hasn't tried to get the vaguest clue who they were since helping elevate their cause, claims that he would like to apologise, only when he's asked yet again. Logically, if he hadn't been asked, he wouldn't be "apologising if you'd like me to", as opposed to, "Shit, I think I made a horrible mistake by retweeting this stuff, but before I issue an apology I had better check all the facts first. Yes, they're a bunch of extremists whose sole purpose is to try and stir racial hatred, this is not something I support and so therefore I will now apologise for being an ignorant idiot who brought the office of the President into disrepute".
I haven't seen the interview in full, but on the topic of him re-tweeting Britain First's videos, I saw this on news sites:
article said:He told Mr Morgan: "If you are telling me they're horrible people, horrible, racist people, I would certainly apologise if you'd like me to do that."
Piers Morgan claimed that he had actually apologised (apparently based on the strength of this quote). I guess that Piers Morgan has insufficient insight to spot a fake apology.
To anyone who attempts to argue this point: An honest and moral person apologises because they want to atone for something they have done wrong. It's not about who is offended by it, or giving an apology because someone asked for one. It would be like me calling you a fucking wanker then saying "I'm sorry if you were offended by that". Either I think I shouldn't have called you a fucking wanker or I don't. Apologising for your offence is suggesting that I'm apologising for your opinion, which makes no sense.
The fact that Donald Trump, as the US's supreme representative, helped voice one of the most bigoted and awful organisations currently in existence without allegedly having the vaguest clue who they were, he hasn't tried to get the vaguest clue who they were since helping elevate their cause, claims that he would like to apologise, only when he's asked yet again. Logically, if he hadn't been asked, he wouldn't be "apologising if you'd like me to", as opposed to, "Shit, I think I made a horrible mistake by retweeting this stuff, but before I issue an apology I had better check all the facts first. Yes, they're a bunch of extremists whose sole purpose is to try and stir racial hatred, this is not something I support and so therefore I will now apologise for being an ignorant idiot who brought the office of the President into disrepute".
Last edited: