Originally posted by: SlitheryDee
Originally posted by: LcarsSystem
Honestly though it really doesn't matter, the term film/movie(s) can be used interchangeably, and should not qualify nor disqualify a person as being elitist. The problem I have is your definition of elite. If I am injured I want to see an elite doctor, if I need a defense in court I want an elite lawyer. Would you not want to go to one of them for help simply because they are the elite? What about elite soldiers who fight and die for a country who will hardly ever recieve public recognition of their brave deeds?
Elitism is fine by me; maybe as a counter, you should try being elite as well. Then you could match them point for point.
Ah but being elite and being elitIST are two different things. Quite often people count themselves among the elite because they are in a position to identify, judge, otherwise criticize the works of the truly elite.
Insisting on calling a production a "film" or a "movie" based simply on your personal estimation of its quality is definitely elitist and quite ridiculous if you think about it. All cinema productions are made in more or less the same way these days. It's not just the good ones that are made with "film" and not just the bad ones that are made by other means.
They are all part of the same industry and they all compete with each other for the viewer's dollar. In essence they are all part of a the same spectrum of quality. Some are at the upper end of the spectrum and some are at the lower end, but they are all movies and they are all films. Some are good movies/films and a lot more are bad movies/films.
Suggesting that those parts of this assortment of entertainment media are fundamentally different than others based only on
your personal preference and insisting on giving them a different label is elitism.