Troll thread asking for ban?

Status
Not open for further replies.

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
452
126
I would agree, and came in here to see if anybody else posted the thread already.

Not a ban, but definitely a lock and probably a vacation as they know better
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
i don't get it. there are things 100x more disgusting/perverted/etc posted in ATOT and this one is the one that deserves a ban?
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
452
126
It's not disgusting/perverted in the normal sense. Seems to me that the OP was calling homosexuality a crime against nature, like beastiality, which IMO is crossing the line of 'shock laughs' into general hate speech.

For me it's not that it's really disgusting or bad, it's just that it was meant to spark outrage and problems which is a TROLL THREAD. No good could have come of that thread and that's my only problem with it. But it's easy enough to just not read it too... *shrug*
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: gorcorps
It's not disgusting/perverted in the normal sense. Seems to me that the OP was calling homosexuality a crime against nature, like beastiality, which IMO is crossing the line of 'shock laughs' into general hate speech.

For me it's not that it's really disgusting or bad, it's just that it was meant to spark outrage and problems which is a TROLL THREAD. No good could have come of that thread and that's my only problem with it. But it's easy enough to just not read it too... *shrug*
No, the OP likes younger girls.

Look at his post history and the pics he posts in the babe thread.
His babe thread contribution
Another 'babe'

Another wonderful post by him
Originally posted by: JEDI
Originally posted by: LS21
:brokenheart:

you know that pics of 12yr old in a full bikini isnt illegal, even if u see pubic hair

i hope u ran an electric magnet over the hard drive(s), else the Feds can recover

 
Oct 27, 2007
17,009
1
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: gorcorps
It's not disgusting/perverted in the normal sense. Seems to me that the OP was calling homosexuality a crime against nature, like beastiality, which IMO is crossing the line of 'shock laughs' into general hate speech.

For me it's not that it's really disgusting or bad, it's just that it was meant to spark outrage and problems which is a TROLL THREAD. No good could have come of that thread and that's my only problem with it. But it's easy enough to just not read it too... *shrug*
No, the OP likes younger girls.

Look at his post history and the pics he posts in the babe thread.
His babe thread contribution
Another 'babe'

Another wonderful post by him
Originally posted by: JEDI
Originally posted by: LS21
:brokenheart:

you know that pics of 12yr old in a full bikini isnt illegal, even if u see pubic hair

i hope u ran an electric magnet over the hard drive(s), else the Feds can recover

Perm ban IMO. AT doesn't need users like this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.