Trial for Four Students Accused of Targeting Two High School Girls for Murder

scott916

Platinum Member
Mar 2, 2005
2,906
0
71
Four teenagers who allegedly plotted to shoot two McClatchy High School girls have been ordered to stand trial, and remain held in custody at Sacramento's juvenile hall.

During a juvenile court proceeding Thursday morning, Judge Jane Ure set a trial date of June 14 for the teens, all of whom are 15-years-old or younger. One of the students, a girl, was allegedly part of an on-going fight between two groups of girls that began in March.

On April 26, they allegedly were heading to school with a handgun, extra ammunition and pictures of two female students. During a truancy check at the Light Rail station on Freeport Boulevard and 4th Avenue, a Sacramento sheriff's deputy found the items. A 15-year-old was carrying the gun with extra bullets in his pocket, investigators said. A 14-year-old was allegedly carrying pictures of the two girls being targeted.

All four face charges of conspiracy to commit assault with a deadly weapon. Two defendants are students from McClatchy. One student is from John Still Middle School, the fourth is from Martin Luther King Elementary. :confused:

Text

 

lyssword

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2005
5,761
25
91
why do they say teens as the only descriptor. Is there only 1 girl involved (out of 4?) description is so vague.. Bleh
 

James Bond

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2005
6,023
0
0
Originally posted by: lyssword
why do they say teens as the only descriptor. Is there only 1 girl involved (out of 4?) description is so vague.. Bleh

Seriously, bad article..
 

Alone

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2006
7,492
0
0
Originally posted by: lyssword
why do they say teens.. Is there only 1 girl involved (out of 4?) description is so vague.. Bleh

Fourteen. Fifteen. Seeing a pattern here?
 

lyssword

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2005
5,761
25
91
Originally posted by: Alone
Originally posted by: lyssword
why do they say teens.. Is there only 1 girl involved (out of 4?) description is so vague.. Bleh

Fourteen. Fifteen. Seeing a pattern here?

Yea sorry it came out wrong. I edited it now. Is this related to the law that minors under 18 will never have descriptions of them in the news? Not that I really read much news, but sometimes the description is so generic they might as well not even put it as news