• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Totally insane M5

Totally ugly as well.

Looks like some really high quality work, but what's up with the color scheme? Why are the interior and exterior completely mismatched? And the orange engine? Must be color blind. Wouldn't want to hit a pothole in that thing either. It doesn't have any tires, just some rubberbands stretched around the rims.
 
Last edited:
iamwiz82 said:
It's nice to see that they let the mentally disabled pick the color combinations. :\
Click to expand...

If you notice, the car was build for a member of the Al Saud royal family, which I think explains the bizarre color combos. The outside is kinda cool, but that interior is just nuts. I think I'd turn epileptic if I had to drive that all the time, but at least I'd convulse happily while I drove off the road into a tree.
 
WTF? They had a great concept and engineering on their suspension, brakes and engine upgrades but turned the styling into rice-heaven. The 2 tone exterior could have been tastefully done but this example is "teenagers look at me" over the top. The seats are fine but the rest of the carbon-fiber infested interior is junk.

Too bad.
 
MotF Bane said:
Looks ugly, but I'm sure it'd be fun on a track.
Click to expand...

Hahaha yeah, I think it's so ugly only the maker and customer could love it, it is a 1/1 production so that Saudi dude must have wanted it that way.

380kmh top speed? That's 236mph! That would make me a bit uncomfortable.
 
Forget the exterior styling, the performance would epic.

You’re going to need some serious bucks to maintain a car like that, though.
 
exdeath said:
So in other words, 4 more cylinders and still not an improvement over the S54.
Click to expand...

How is it not? The S65 is a 5.0L V10 revving to 8250RPM and 507BHP stock. The S54 barely puts out 3 more hp/l in a smaller engine that doesn't rev as high. If that engine isn't worthy of praise (the S54 as well) I don't know what is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top