- Apr 10, 2001
- 48,775
- 3
- 81
Originally posted by: pulse8
I'm rarely able to max out my 6mb connection with a torrent. I do it all the time with usenet.
Ditto. Damn Shaw Cable. :|:thumbsdown:Originally posted by: Bozono
Both have their purpose. Newsgroups pwn for documentaries, lossless, and other things. The problem with BT is that many ISP's now throttle the .torrent protocol, including mine.
Originally posted by: pulse8
I'm rarely able to max out my 6mb connection with a torrent. I do it all the time with usenet.
Originally posted by: xcript
Ditto. Damn Shaw Cable. :|:thumbsdown:Originally posted by: Bozono
Both have their purpose. Newsgroups pwn for documentaries, lossless, and other things. The problem with BT is that many ISP's now throttle the .torrent protocol, including mine.
![]()
Originally posted by: dighn
Originally posted by: xcript
Ditto. Damn Shaw Cable. :|:thumbsdown:Originally posted by: Bozono
Both have their purpose. Newsgroups pwn for documentaries, lossless, and other things. The problem with BT is that many ISP's now throttle the .torrent protocol, including mine.
![]()
the good news: shaw cable just raised their monthly caps by 2x!!! this means 60 gb for regular, 100 for xtreme!!!
Originally posted by: quakefiend420
then someone explain why torrents are better than newsgroups
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
Both are great depending on what you'r elooking for. But newsgroups download FAR faster for me. I've only maxed out my download connection with a Torrent once. I max it out every single time on newsgroups.
Originally posted by: AznMaverick
i thought it was a rule not to talk about usenet...hehe.