• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Top Genome-crunchers 12. to 19. May 2002.

Rattledagger

Elite Member
1st, welcome to 2 new crunchers. 🙂
2nd, the team still hangs on to #31.

3rd, this weeks production is from Sun May 12 12:56:02 PDT 2002 to Sun May 19 12:54:27 PDT 2002

# ???. place ???. tot wu ???. tot gen. ?? wu/week ? gen./week ? place (up) ? # (up) ???. Name
1 ???.. 10 ???.. 4.572,17 ???? 323 ???. 740,67 ???. 45 ???? 0 ???? 0 ???. ShotgunSi
2 ???.. 26 ????. 794,67 ????. 54 ???. 612,87 ???. 43 ???.. 15 ???? 8 ???. BaronUK
3 ???.. 15 ???.. 1.985,87 ???? 125 ???. 445,38 ???. 22 ???? 4 ???? 0 ???. Carrot39
4 ???.. 25 ????. 814,50 ????. 47 ???. 422,04 ???. 24 ???? 9 ???? 3 ???. jevans
5 ???? 2 ???. 23.272,47 ???. 1.548 ???. 395,94 ???. 19 ???? 0 ???.. -1 ???. synth17
6 ???? 1 ???. 38.223,70 ???. 2.595 ???. 317,14 ???. 20 ???? 0 ???.. -4 ???. dewedge
7 ???.. 39 ????. 270,68 ????. 19 ???. 270,68 ???. 19 ???. new ???. new ???. Cannon
8 ???? 3 ???. 15.827,15 ???. 1.003 ???. 251,63 ???. 13 ???? 0 ???.. -2 ???. imhotepmp
9 ???.. 36 ????. 320,31 ????. 18 ???. 157,58 ???.. 9 ???? 8 ???? 5 ???. Vincero
10 ???. 18 ???.. 1.820,94 ???? 126 ???. 138,93 ???.. 7 ???.. -1 ???.. -2 ???. _leech_
11 ???. 29 ????. 603,75 ????. 48 ???. 126,91 ???.. 9 ???? 0 ???? 1 ???. jchu14
12 ???. 37 ????. 283,76 ????. 21 ???. 112,05 ???.. 6 ???? 6 ???? 1 ???. grlong
13 ???. 50 ????.. 57,59 ????.. 4 ???.. 57,59 ???.. 4 ???. new ???. new ???. KnickNut3
14 ???. 11 ???.. 3.713,82 ???? 240 ???.. 49,08 ???.. 4 ???? 0 ???.. -3 ???. Blazer
15 ???.. 8 ???.. 6.672,01 ???? 404 ???.. 40,19 ???.. 2 ???? 0 ???. -10 ???. nexus9
16 ???.. 5 ???. 11.429,00 ???? 807 ???.. 21,37 ???.. 1 ???? 0 ???.. -7 ???. smp

Total production was 4.160,05 wu and 247 genes.
16 of 61 returned anything

 
Originally posted by: jevans
thanks for the stats. btw first post!

Goodness gracious. What kinda fleet are you running G@H on? You've just zoomed right past me in stats. 😕
 
2 ~1.6 amd xp
2 ~ 700 p3

but i have switched over to g@h 3 beta. anyone planing on staying with genome "classic?"
 
Originally posted by: jchu14
Originally posted by: jevans
thanks for the stats. btw first post!

Goodness gracious. What kinda fleet are you running G@H on? You've just zoomed right past me in stats. 😕

Ugh, I need to take a lot at that FAQ. Its looks long and complicated hehe.
Time to upgrade my fleet.
 
Ugh so I read that entire FAQ and basically if I understand this correctly.

G@H will keep running as it is as "G@H Classic"
All future improvements to the project will be incorporated into the F@H project.
So long term we should switch to F@H becuase some of the G@H code and work will end up being crunched in that project.
But from a stats perspective you would want to stick with the "Classic".
UGH what to do what to do.


I will probably crunch for Classic for awhile till I hit some kind of milestone, then move over to F@H.
 
Back
Top