Considering there is not a toyota dealership for almost 75 miles, and there is a ford dealership here in town.
The IBM rating may be higher than some think. They have been exporting jobs for a while now and stopped giving head counts as well.
Just had some layoffs and now doing furloghs with more layoffs coming so they don't have to pay 401k. ...
Does it makes sense to pay top dollar to a employee who is going to be gone in a year or two?
What does a dealership have to do with it? They are fleet. They are dealing directly with Ford.
That's what I keep hearing as well, that IBM plans to dramatically cut its U.S. workforce over the next decade, to well below half of its current level.
^
That and IBM is also known to lay someone off and then offer them a job back but at lower pay. After a week or so of lower duties they are returned to what they were doing before.
Yikes. THAT is when you know the economy is horrendous. People in a good economy would never tolerate that kind of BS. They would get fired from IBM then go to some other company instead of begging for their job back. The really scary part is that the government claims the recession ended 3-4 years ago. This is the good economy? Having to beg for your job? I would hate to see what a bad economy looks like. Sucking a dick just to get an interview might be the next big trend.
Jesus I wouldnt hire any of these stupid dumbed down morons. Who would, how can anyone be a functional employee when they cant even see what's going on? Or are too stupid too care?
What does the dealership have to do with it? Ever hear of this thing called service and recalls?
Does it make sense to drive close to 70, 75 miles one way to get a vehicle serviced under warranty?
You obviously have no idea how fleets work. Hint: they don't take them to a dealership for service like you do for your family car.
We take our to the dealership for service.
Then its not fleet, at least not by Ford standards.
I still find it mind boggling that you people expect top dollar for no-skill/low-skill jobs.
If there are 100,000 people in a geographic area who are willing and qualified to do a job, it's not going to be a very high paying job. That's simple economics.
When a company like wal-mart turns a massive profit every year, why shouldn't the company pay its employees well?
You have a choice, either demand higher wages, or pay higher taxes to support those on welfare.
The choice should be "1) Work for what someone's willing to pay you, or 2) Don't work and feel shame for having to turn to public assistance/charity." That we've gone from this line of thinking to your way of thinking is a sure-fire sign that our republic is failing.
Your second comment shows your ignorance of the world (or your stupidity...probably both.) The choice should be "1) Work for what someone's willing to pay you, or 2) Don't work and feel shame for having to turn to public assistance/charity." That we've gone from this line of thinking to your way of thinking is a sure-fire sign that our republic is failing.
2) Don't work and feel shame for having to turn to public assistance/charity."
Your second comment shows your ignorance of the world (or your stupidity...probably both.)
Welfare is a way of life, it is nothing to be ashamed of by todays standards.
No it is not, yes it is.
Can I be anymore clear? :|