Top 10 Tech Winners for 2009

tyler811

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2002
5,385
0
71
1:Who would have thought that something good could come out of Microsoft not once but TWICE in the same year. Windows 7 seemed to do everything that Vista didn’t. It works, it’s stable, it has drivers for the stuff that’s out there and the UAC (User Account Control) is scaled back. Way to go Microsoft - this earns you our coveted number ONE SPOT in this year's list of Tech Winners.





http://www.geeks.com/techtips/2009/t...s-for-2009.htm
 

Cogman

Lifer
Sep 19, 2000
10,284
138
106
Blech, I hate these stupid anti-vista reviewers.

Newsflash: Vista works, it has drivers, and UAC wasn't THAT annoying (and could be disabled).

But, NOOO, We've got to bash MS every chance we get, just because our lives are tiny and insignificant.

The ironic thing about reviewers like this is that they don't realize that Win7 is really just vista with a UI update. That's it, the core hasn't changed a whole heck of a lot. Some things where tweaked and optimized, but under the hood it is really quite similar to vista.

Vista from XP was a big change, and reviewers like this one were too short sighted to realize that, yes, changing your driver infrastructure is not an easy thing. Honestly, I'm surprised that the vista driver transition went as smoothly as it did.
 

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
I can't even tell the difference between Vista and 7.

UAC is much more laxed with 7 (by default). And don't tell me about adjusting it up or down because an average joe will never mess with any of the default settings of the OS.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Please win 7 is just hated Vista w/o a option to revert and cascade start menu like classic and a few less intrusive instructions. Peapole are sheep.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
SSD's coming of age should be number 1 and it's not even listed.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Blech, I hate these stupid anti-vista reviewers.

Newsflash: Vista works, it has drivers, and UAC wasn't THAT annoying (and could be disabled).

But, NOOO, We've got to bash MS every chance we get, just because our lives are tiny and insignificant.

The ironic thing about reviewers like this is that they don't realize that Win7 is really just vista with a UI update. That's it, the core hasn't changed a whole heck of a lot. Some things where tweaked and optimized, but under the hood it is really quite similar to vista.

Vista from XP was a big change, and reviewers like this one were too short sighted to realize that, yes, changing your driver infrastructure is not an easy thing. Honestly, I'm surprised that the vista driver transition went as smoothly as it did.

I agree Vista was better if only for a decent, read:cascading, start menu. Any fool can disable intrusions everyone complained about..
 

rockyct

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2001
6,656
32
91
I really liked Vista because I didn't have driver problems, so of course, I also really like Win7. It's nice to see the bandwagon joining now.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,553
3,714
126
Please win 7 is just hated Vista w/o a option to revert and cascade start menu like classic and a few less intrusive instructions. Peapole are sheep.

I noticed that most of it was press. I would hear people all the time say Vista was bad. When I asked them what was wrong I would get:
My brother's wife's friend's siter-in-law says its bad and she knows about computers
or
My software from 1995 doesn't work so Vista is bad
 

Platypus

Lifer
Apr 26, 2001
31,046
321
136
I can't even tell the difference between Vista and 7.

The absolutely HORRIBLE UI in Windows 7 is definitely a big difference.
Vista worked fine for me, even with a bunch of legacy hardware... too much unfounded bandwagon hate for that one.
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
I was with the sheeple hating on Vista, then I got a Vista laptop, and didn't really care.
Once you get used to it, it's fine. The main issues are with using it on a laptop - not a great experience.
Vista vs 7 on a desktop though? Not a massive difference.
I think that's almost where Microsoft win. People hated Vista so much that even though 7 isn't anything special, just by not being Vista in name, everyone welcomes it as the second coming of Jesus.
The only reason I bought 7 was because it was very cheap compared to any other copy of Windows ever (due to the preorder offer in the UK being for the full version instead of upgrade).
 

Mide

Golden Member
Mar 27, 2008
1,547
0
71
7 looks and feels exactly like Vista. That being said, there is still no reason to upgrade, XP is humming along just fine.
 

Cheesetogo

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2005
3,823
10
81
I love the remark about 7 being stable. During the 3 or so years that I ran Vista, I never had the OS crash once.
 

Platypus

Lifer
Apr 26, 2001
31,046
321
136
7 looks and feels exactly like Vista. That being said, there is still no reason to upgrade, XP is humming along just fine.

...except for the whole completely different UI that is. How can you say it looks exactly the same?

The task bar is fucking atrocious in windows 7...
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,389
8,547
126
I agree Vista was better if only for a decent, read:cascading, start menu. Any fool can disable intrusions everyone complained about..

i have no idea why they got rid of that. it's like they decided the quick launch should be self updating and be the start menu.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
7 looks and feels exactly like Vista. That being said, there is still no reason to upgrade, XP is humming along just fine.

I felt 2000 was humming along just fine until MS decided to end Direct X support for 2000/XP.

I don't like the confusing explorer view with unneeded libraries and favorites folders clogging pane. I know where I put shit.

I don't like the newer search windows.

I don't like the new control panel view where nothing is where it seems.

I don't like the new start menu in 7, classic option should be there.

I don't like confusing file sharing/networking.

I don't like having no file menu and ribbons instead in new MS apps like paint, word, wordpad etc

The only thing decent is eye candy if you're into that sort of thing, 'security' (not that I ever had a virus with 2k/xp) and search box but that takes moving off mouse into keyboard.

But MS found a way to finally force us off XP - discontinue Direct X support because they knew adoption rate would be very slow otherwise.

Someday you'll have to move - best thing to do is start with a smile on your face by going over to a MS shill like Paul Thurotts site and reading how wonderful it is.
 
Last edited:

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
i have no idea why they got rid of that. it's like they decided the quick launch should be self updating and be the start menu.

It's like the states who change their licensee plates every couple years - new guy just has to leave his mark whether old works just fine or not. MS has those guys too and worst part is they won't let one revert to classic.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Because they haven't. It's just the techie early adopters who have them right now. It'll be 2010 for the SSD coming of age.

I disagree Anand does too - calling it a quantum leap in computer performance and drives an order of magnitude (base 10) faster than vraptors, the fastest mechanical drives out.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
I wish the classic start menu was in Win7 as well.

Win7 is a lot more different under the hood than people think, primarily because the interface seems so familiar. It isn't the huge change that XP to Vista represented, but it's a considerable improvement.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
I disagree Anand does too - calling it a quantum leap in computer performance and drives an order of magnitude (base 10) faster than vraptors, the fastest mechanical drives out.

That site listed hdtv as #10. HDTVs have existed for what? 8 years now?

Social networking is #5. I got on facebook 2 years ago. And I was late.

SSDs are very niche products, are very expensive, have very low penetration, and still have problems. Intel had huge firmware issues this year, Samsung JUST released a firmware updating tool maybe 2 weeks ago along with their first TRIM support, and Indilinx is still cutting their teeth in the SSD arena. The SSD market is going through it's initial growing pains.

Next year we'll see sizes of SSD drives going up and prices come down. The firmware bugs will be ironed out and manufacturers will start offering desktops with a 120GB SSD and a 2 TB storage drive. The SSD will come of age when it is either standard or a very popular substitution, not a $300 add-on for a loss of 1300 GB of storage space.