Top 10 photo editing flubs

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
Buttzilla

Buttzilla

Platinum Member
Oct 12, 2000
2,676
1
81
i'm not surprised with most of those pictures but the national geographic one was shocking. the photo didn't hurt anyone but of all the new agencies and magazines they're known for their natural photos.
 
calvinbiss

calvinbiss

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2001
1,745
0
0
The smoke one was ridiculous for a non-advertising pic. The Toronto one is still the best.
 
Triumph

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
Never seen the Toronto shot before. Not only is it insulting to my anti-PC sensitivities, it's a pretty bad photochop. Everything about that image is wrong!

Originally posted by: drum
A little clone stamp fail on the smoke :laugh:
Click to expand...

Yeah that's pretty freakin' bad, from a PS standpoint. I could do better than that!
 
Modelworks

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
I have a friend that does retouching for movies and film. He has a list of clips I'll see if I can get from him to post. They are not as easy to see in film , but there are some great ones out there. Where actors wanted certain things removed, everything from moles to extra weight and either by choice or chance the editing didn't go all that well.
 
yllus

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
I'm happy to see that my city is number one for something. :p
 
Demon-Xanth

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
I don't think the OJ and pyramid ones were bad though. The OJ one was darkened all over, not just his skin to generate a "dark feeling" picture and wasn't provided to show itself as a mug shot. The pyramids weren't in a picture where the positioning was important to the article.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom