Top 10 Countries Where You’re Most Likely to Get Food Poisoning Are ...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
If you mean a prescription for Lariam as being an india packet, you need to take that starting 2 weeks before travel.

They sell packets containing said countries bacteria so you can adjust at home. They have them for India, Mexico, etc. It basically gives you the squirts in the comfort of your own home, rather than an alley in Mumbai. Once your body adapts enough to handle it, you can explore carefree!
 

Mike64

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2011
2,108
101
91
Without seeing the actualy study and results themselves, it's hard to say just how dumb it is, but it looks pretty dumb based on the excerpts published by Yahoo and The Express...

This is probably my favorite quote out of the bunch: "Sixty-two per cent of people asked claimed they didn't always understand what they were ordering." What the hell does that have to do with food poisoning?
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,418
1,598
126
Even if you take precautions in India... diarrhea

I don't even get shots when I go back to Mumbai anymore. Of course, I only eat at hotels and high quality high volume restaurants, and use bottled water for everything.
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
America makes sense - because businesses will do anything to make a quick buck; like when we were told that cow anuses, hooves and eye lids are "beef".
 

Remobz

Platinum Member
Jun 9, 2005
2,564
37
91
I don't even get shots when I go back to Mumbai anymore. Of course, I only eat at hotels and high quality high volume restaurants, and use bottled water for everything.

Every person I know that has visited India always gets the "runs" and talk badly about the food conditions there.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,418
1,598
126
Every person I know that has visited India always gets the "runs" and talk badly about the food conditions there.

I have ~50 days under my belt and have nothing but good things to say. YMMV.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
29,447
24,129
146
They sell packets containing said countries bacteria so you can adjust at home. They have them for India, Mexico, etc. It basically gives you the squirts in the comfort of your own home, rather than an alley in Mumbai. Once your body adapts enough to handle it, you can explore carefree!
:biggrin::awe: lulz
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,600
4,698
136
Without seeing the actualy study and results themselves, it's hard to say just how dumb it is, but it looks pretty dumb based on the excerpts published by Yahoo and The Express...

This is probably my favorite quote out of the bunch: "Sixty-two per cent of people asked claimed they didn't always understand what they were ordering." What the hell does that have to do with food poisoning?


Userious?

How it is cooked (or if it is served raw), what ingredients are in it (some ingredients carry a higher risk) and where it is from, for starters.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
Userious?

How it is cooked (or if it is served raw), what ingredients are in it (some ingredients carry a higher risk) and where it is from, for starters.

None of that has anything to do whether or not it will cause food poisoning, nor does a person understanding that have any remote issue. The only cases would be in consuming potentially dangerous food (raw meat / eggs / etc).

Which, is important, because I am going to bet 90% of the "America people" that reported a food born illness are full of shit. Eating Taco Bell and it exploding your butthole isn't food poisoning.
 

Mike64

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2011
2,108
101
91
Userious?

How it is cooked (or if it is served raw), what ingredients are in it (some ingredients carry a higher risk) and where it is from, for starters.
Very few restaurants even in the UK - excepting of course uber-trendy hipster joints and some high-end fine dining places - list that sort of detail on menus in the first place. If you must know that much about your food when eating out, you probably shouldn't be eating out in the first place. If you can't tell the difference between raw eggs and meat and cooked when it's on a plate in front of you, you deserve whatever you get. And lastly, if you go to a foreign country and want to understand what's on the menu, you should probably take a little trouble to learn something of the native language - something UK (and US, though they weren't surveyed here) tourists in particular excel at not doing. Unsurprisingly, shouting in English at a menu and expecting an intelligible response would be even less helpful than shouting at a native, albeit somewhat more humorous.:whiste:
 
Last edited:

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
I dunno, I went to a US fast food joint recently, and they had a sign on the counter which read something like:

"We will prepare food according to customer's instructions, but remind customers that ground meat should not be served rare or medium-rare to minimize the risk of food borne illness".

To me, that is an admission that if asked, they would serve a rare burger - which is a clear-cut case of gross negligence as burgers cannot safely be served rare. Moreover, the fact that they have a sign pointing out out that they know it can cause food-borne illness, means that they know that it is negligent - in other words, wilful negligence - and triple damages for the plaintiff.
I wouldn't eat ground meat from the grocery store at less than medium, nor would I trust the surface of steaks that come from the big slaughter houses. But one of my favorite restaurants grinds their hamburger fresh daily from meat it gets from a local butcher. I can't count the number pink burgers I've happily eaten with little concern that it could make me sick.
 

Mike64

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2011
2,108
101
91
To me, that is an admission that [...]
No offense, but don't give up your day job to become a lawyer on the Interwebs. ;)

Moreover, the fact that they have a sign pointing out out that they know it can cause food-borne illness, means that they know that it is negligent - in other words, wilful negligence - and triple damages for the plaintiff.
Much (much) more likely is that state or local health laws or regs allow them to serve it that way when ordered by the consumer who has been informed at the time of the potential risk.

When the first wave of anti-rare-hamburger laws were passed, many of them did require many foods to be cooked to specified minimum internal temperatures with no exceptions, but consumer backlash caused some (many?) places to reconsider and allow consumers to choose their own poison, so to speak, as long as they are warned of the potential danger. (See, for example, http://www.achd.net/food/rawfood.html.)
 
Last edited:

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
He is saying that what passes for potable water in many parts Mexico would not pass EPA standards.
Therefore, people who drink that water regularly, will be more likely to have a stronger immune system. Google "George Carlin Hudson river" for an audiovisual guide.
 

Mark R

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,513
16
81
No offense, but don't give up your day job to become a lawyer on the Interwebs. ;)
I have no intention of, but I know of no other industry where a business can put a customer at excessive risk, especially not where a non-professional consumer asks for it.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
I have no intention of, but I know of no other industry where a business can put a customer at excessive risk, especially not where a non-professional consumer asks for it.

Plenty of other industries do that. Ever buy a car? Because, while they (manufacturer and retailer) don't recommend you drive at excessive speeds, they certainly don't prohibit your from it. Alcohol industry certainly recommends you not drink in excess or while pregnant, but they certainly don't stop you.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,418
1,598
126
I have no intention of, but I know of no other industry where a business can put a customer at excessive risk, especially not where a non-professional consumer asks for it.

"hey Jimmy, I'm a first time gun buyer but I've played a lot of Counterstrike. How much is that DEagle and is it good for concealed carry?"
 

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,409
1,617
136
I was down in middle Georgia last weekend and walked into a Longhorn restaurant where they were smiling at their 77 health rating. I ordered everything well-done, including the water.
 

Mike64

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2011
2,108
101
91
I have no intention of, but I know of no other industry where a business can put a customer at excessive risk, especially not where a non-professional consumer asks for it.
Well, for starters, and keeping it in the family, so to speak, there's the raw meat industry, which ships the product in the first place knowing full well it contains at least some number of potentially deadly bacteria. And which fights tooth and nail against every new regulatory measure aimed at requiring them to do anything to minimize the risk, and which, just for icing on the cake, has so far gotten away with heading off even record-keeping requirements sufficient to trace their product back to its source when the inevitable outbreaks do in fact occur. If they can get away with all that, why should "retailers" be prevented from giving a consumer what they want and specifically ask for, when they've got big, scary-looking signs at the point of sale warning them of the potential risk?

And why is just limited to ground beef? What about requiring that no restaurant serve eggs fried sunny-side up, over easy, lightly poached, or soft-scrambled?

And then there are: the tobacco industry. There is absolutely no amount of (addictive) tobacco that can be "safely" smoked at any age, and probably little, if any, that can be safely chewed. The liquor industry. Manufacturers and retailers of acetaminophen. Which has a surprisingly low acute toxicity level for something so often taken by millions of people every day. Admittedly, the FDA is trying to do something about that by, get this, limiting the size of containers that consumers can buy, though they obviously can't stop people from buying multiple containers unless they make it prescription-only. The electrical appliance industry, which isn't legally required to obtain safety ratings for their products, and well, you get the idea..
 
Last edited:

Mike64

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2011
2,108
101
91
Everyone with a weak stomach in Mexico already died. Thats why :awe:
Yabbut everyone seems to be forgetting that they surveyed British tourists who travel to these places, not the natives who live there.
 

Mike64

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2011
2,108
101
91
"hey Jimmy, I'm a first time gun buyer but I've played a lot of Counterstrike. How much is that DEagle and is it good for concealed carry?"
Well, playing Devil's advocate, that poses a potential risk to other people, not so much to the purchaser. :whiste:
 
Last edited: