Tony Blair To Get Congressional GOLD Medal

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
WELL DESERVED

The US Congress is set to honour UK Prime Minister Tony Blair with its highest civilian honour.

The Congressional Gold Medal was first struck to honour the first US President, George Washington, for his services in the Revolutionary War of

Independence against Great Britain..

Now Tony Blair is set to become the first Briton since Sir Winston Churchill to receive such an honour.

There have only been 17 foreign recipients of the medal, including such figures as Nelson Mandela, Mother Theresa, and Pope John Paul II.

Among the other US recipients are General Douglas MacArthur and Colin Powell.

The move is in recognition of Mr Blair's support for the US in the war on Iraq.

In its resolution, the US Congress says that "Prime Minister Tony Blair has clearly demonstrated, during a very trying and historic time for our two countries,

that he is a staunch and steadfast ally" and cites his "outstanding and enduring contributions to maintaining the security of all freedom-loving nations."

Fulsome praise

In its first legislative test in the Senate, the Senate Banking Committee unanimously approved the resolution on a voice vote.

It will now go the Senate floor, where it is assured of passage, with 75 out of the 100 Senators already sponsoring the bill.

Senator Elizabeth Dole of North Carolina, who initiated the legislation, said that the prime minister deserved credit for sticking to his principles despite the

political risks at home.

"With steadfast and unwavering resolve, he has held firm to his principles without regard to, indeed in spite of, the shifting political winds... Prime Minister

Blair has gone beyond friendship to demonstrate true leadership for his nation and for Europe."

And the chairman of the committee, Senator Richard Shelby, said that "it would have been relatively easy for Tony Blair to take a less difficult course. Great

leaders recognise those critical junctures where politics must take a back seat to the greater interests of the nation and the world."

The bill is also proceeding through the House of Representatives, where its sponsor, Representative Richard Baker, said:

"This medal attempts to capture for historical keeping what most Americans already feel in their hearts: Tony Blair is a hero."

Closest ally

The praise was echoed by both Republicans and Democrats on the committee, with democratic Senator Paul Sarbanes warning that the medal should only

be given sparingly to those who truly deserve it.

Mr Blair's steadfast support of Mr Bush, during a time when the US felt let down by many of its traditional allies both in Europe and the Americas, has made

him enormously popular in the United States.

His appeal spans both conservatives who believe that he is able to express the coalition's war aims more convincingly than its leader, and liberals who

believe he has been a moderating force on Mr Bush's foreign policy.

The UK is widely credited with convincing Mr Bush to renew the Mid-East peace process , and recently to release or charge those held as terrorists at

Guantanamo Bay.

Visiting Britain last week, Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said: "The 'special relationship' between the US and the UK is stronger than ever, and

Americans are the better for it."

And President George W Bush has bestowed the relationship with Mr Blair with his own symbolism, inviting him several times to Camp David and to his ranch

in Crawford Texas - a trip, he has made clear, which is reserved for only the closest allies. .

EDIT: sorry about that, guys.
 

jaeger66

Banned
Jan 1, 2001
3,852
0
0
He isn't getting the Medal of Honor, the MoH is only for exceptional bravery in combat. So exceptional that you usually have to be dead to get it.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Who gets patted on the back next, Richard Perle?

Damn, do you ever quit? He's not even in the same league as Blair. He (Blair) is a uniter. Read the article.
 

SnapIT

Banned
Jul 8, 2002
4,355
1
0
Tooo bad he went agains the willl of the people who elected him, that would make him what? a traitor?
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
No a principled man . . . curiously his principles weren't too strong during the previous five years but I'm sure Clinton is to blame. I wonder what kind of projects UK companies will get out the rebuilding of Iraq? It's a shame BP is one of the few oil behemoths that didn't dabble in much Middle East crude . . . at least until they purchased Amoco.
 

sMiLeYz

Platinum Member
Feb 3, 2003
2,696
0
76
I like Tony Blair alot, hes a staunch supporter of the US, our most steadfast ally and a liberal :D ... but face the music.

The guy commited political suicide in his own country by supporting us, hes own Labour party resents him because he just killed their chances in future elections.

The next Prime Minister isnt going to be nearly as US-friendly as Blair was, we're going to have to deal with a world that doesnt trust us... alone.
 

Fencer128

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,700
1
91
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
I like Tony Blair alot, hes a staunch supporter of the US, our most steadfast ally and a liberal :D ... but face the music.

The guy commited political suicide in his own country by supporting us, hes own Labour party resents him because he just killed their chances in future elections.

The next Prime Minister isnt going to be nearly as US-friendly as Blair was, we're going to have to deal with a world that doesnt trust us... alone.

Not true. He has not committed political suicide. No doubt some will no longer support him - but it is by no means decided that he has lost a mjaority of support or has no chance of being relected. Opinion polls still show Labour well ahead of the other parties.

Cheers,

Andy
 

Fencer128

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,700
1
91
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
No a principled man . . . curiously his principles weren't too strong during the previous five years but I'm sure Clinton is to blame. I wonder what kind of projects UK companies will get out the rebuilding of Iraq? It's a shame BP is one of the few oil behemoths that didn't dabble in much Middle East crude . . . at least until they purchased Amoco.

I am quite convinced from interviews he's given recently and his prior views that he would have personally preferred the rebuilding work to be under the auspices of the UN. The US control of the current rebuilding/financing situation is not what he would have chosen if he had been in control. For that reason I do not see him publically promoting the UK won contracts in the same way I constantly read about the US contracts that have been awarded.

Cheers,

Andy
 

phillyTIM

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2001
1,942
10
81
good lord, he's getting an award just because he was a conspiritor/puppet to the Bush regime's sham of an invasion (which, now almost 2 months, still has no evidence to back up the reason the invasion was justified with).

the world is a sad place these days
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Powell and Blair suffer from the same ailment. When they don't agree with Bush they are hailed as moderates, doves, etc. but as soon as they agree with Bush they are suddenly idiotic lapdogs.

You people's hatred of Bush is almost as thinly veiled as your lack of intelligence.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Powell and Blair suffer from the same ailment. When they don't agree with Bush they are hailed as moderates, doves, etc. but as soon as they agree with Bush they are suddenly idiotic lapdogs.

You people's hatred of Bush is almost as thinly veiled as your lack of intelligence.

Well one could say that the unwavering support of a man who caused the invasion of a non aggressor nation (however "noble" the intent ) reflects badly on their intelligence, or at least their morals, but hatred here is never thinly veiled. I do not hate Bush. That requires emotional effort. I merely detest him. The effect is that whenever someone near me boasts about having him as President, I start to look around the room embarrassed as if the braggart were spreading his peacock feathers about having the village idiot as mayor. That is unfair of me though. The village idiot may be a better man than Bush, as far as principles go.
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Powell and Blair suffer from the same ailment. When they don't agree with Bush they are hailed as moderates, doves, etc. but as soon as they agree with Bush they are suddenly idiotic lapdogs.

You people's hatred of Bush is almost as thinly veiled as your lack of intelligence.

Well one could say that the unwavering support of a man who caused the invasion of a non aggressor nation (however "noble" the intent ) reflects badly on their intelligence, or at least their morals, but hatred here is never thinly veiled. I do not hate Bush. That requires emotional effort. I merely detest him. The effect is that whenever someone near me boasts about having him as President, I start to look around the room embarrassed as if the braggart were spreading his peacock feathers about having the village idiot as mayor. That is unfair of me though. The village idiot may be a better man than Bush, as far as principles go.


Thanks for making my point.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Powell and Blair suffer from the same ailment. When they don't agree with Bush they are hailed as moderates, doves, etc. but as soon as they agree with Bush they are suddenly idiotic lapdogs.

You people's hatred of Bush is almost as thinly veiled as your lack of intelligence.

Well one could say that the unwavering support of a man who caused the invasion of a non aggressor nation (however "noble" the intent ) reflects badly on their intelligence, or at least their morals, but hatred here is never thinly veiled. I do not hate Bush. That requires emotional effort. I merely detest him. The effect is that whenever someone near me boasts about having him as President, I start to look around the room embarrassed as if the braggart were spreading his peacock feathers about having the village idiot as mayor. That is unfair of me though. The village idiot may be a better man than Bush, as far as principles go.


Thanks for making my point.


Your're quite welcome, however the many readers of these posts will take their point quite differently than you intend
 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Powell and Blair suffer from the same ailment. When they don't agree with Bush they are hailed as moderates, doves, etc. but as soon as they agree with Bush they are suddenly idiotic lapdogs.

You people's hatred of Bush is almost as thinly veiled as your lack of intelligence.

Well one could say that the unwavering support of a man who caused the invasion of a non aggressor nation (however "noble" the intent ) reflects badly on their intelligence, or at least their morals, but hatred here is never thinly veiled. I do not hate Bush. That requires emotional effort. I merely detest him. The effect is that whenever someone near me boasts about having him as President, I start to look around the room embarrassed as if the braggart were spreading his peacock feathers about having the village idiot as mayor. That is unfair of me though. The village idiot may be a better man than Bush, as far as principles go.


Thanks for making my point.


Your're quite welcome, however the many readers of these posts will take their point quite differently than you intend


Nope, Ultra Quiet got it quite right. The bashing of President Bush for the sole sake of bashing based on blind hate is rampant on this board. I take anyone that calls him an idiot as one of those haters that can ignore facts completely in their blind obsession.
 

phillyTIM

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2001
1,942
10
81
i dont think the bush bashing is limited to this board, by far

i think the board just reflects the general consensus everywhere in the world

there are obvious reasons why bush is despised around the world

remember, we have representation of the whole world here in members

i don't hear many complaints about the fanatical pro-bushers around here. deal with it.
 

ConclamoLudus

Senior member
Jan 16, 2003
572
0
0
Originally posted by: phillyTIM
i dont think the bush bashing is limited to this board, by far

i think the board just reflects the general consensus everywhere in the world

there are obvious reasons why bush is despised around the world

remember, we have representation of the whole world here in members

i don't hear many complaints about the fanatical pro-bushers around here. deal with it.


Is this a complaint about the fanatical pro-bushers? :Q
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Blair stuck to his beliefs when he could have easily done otherwise. Rare in today's political world and a medal well deserved.