Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: Mill
No, it isn't like saying you feed a homeless person you have an obligation to them. A Pet can't walk away and get placed with a decent family or a shelter if some asshat is feeding it, and then decides that nine dollars is just TOO much. That's about two weeks worth of Dog Food, really. Humans are not animals, they can get help by asking for it, but a Pet just sits there loving its bastard owner.
If I am reading the article correctly, the pets all made it to the shelter just fine when the $9 vacinations became strictly reinforced. And what would have happened if these people didn't feed strays? They'd be dead on the street somewhere? Or maybe dead sooner from being stuck in an overcrowded shelter?
And yes, I think a stray pet would love it's "Bastard Owner" that took enough time to feed it and keep it alive when someone else obviously didn't.
Maybe I am missing something? Am I getting the term stray pet confused with another term?