Tonight on PBS: Frontline - The Way the Music Died

Stark

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2000
7,735
0
0
» The Way the Music Died

Thursday, May 27, at 9pm, 60 minutes

In the recording studios of Los Angeles and the boardrooms of New York, they say the record business has been hit by a perfect storm: a convergence of industry-wide consolidation, Internet theft, and artistic drought. The effect has been the loss of billions of dollars, thousands of jobs, and that indefinable quality that once characterized American pop music.

"It's a classic example of art and commerce colliding and nobody wins," says Nic Harcourt, music director at Los Angeles's KCRW-FM. "It's just a train wreck."

In "The Way the Music Died," airing Thursday, May 27, at 9 P.M. on PBS (check local listings), FRONTLINE® follows the trajectory of the recording industry from its post-Woodstock heyday in the 1970s and 1980s to what one observer describes as a "hysteria" of mass layoffs and bankruptcy in 2004.

"This is the story of how the pressures to perform financially have affected the ability of many pop musicians to make the art they want," says FRONTLINE producer Michael Kirk. "The starkness of the difference between the environment that exists in the midst of this 'perfect storm' and the way the business once operated is nothing short of astonishing."

The documentary tells its story through the aspirations and experiences of four artists: veteran musician David Crosby, who hopes his newest album will cash in on the resurgence of baby boomers buying music; songwriter/producer Mark Hudson, a former member of The Hudson Brothers band whose daughter, Sarah, is about to release her first single and album; and a new rock band, Velvet Revolver, composed of former members of the rock groups Guns n' Roses and Stone Temple Pilots, whose first album will be released in June.

But how will these artists fare at a time when the record industry is clearly hurting?

"It's a big moment," says Melinda Newman, West Coast bureau chief for Billboard magazine. "There are about 30,000 albums released a year, maybe a hundred are hits. Sales have fallen from $40 billion to $28 billion in just three years."

FRONTLINE follows the trends in the record business that led to unprecedented growth of more than 20 percent per year in the 25 years following the industry watershed at Woodstock. Crosby, for example, recalls how his new band's album made millions after Crosby, Stills, and Nash performed at the legendary rock concert.

"It was the moment when all that generation of hippies looked at each other and said, 'Wait a minute! We're not a fringe element. There's millions of us! We're what's happening here,'" Crosby tells FRONTLINE.

FRONTLINE follows the career of rocker Mark Hudson, whose group The Hudson Brothers began as a 1970s rock band. "It was post-Woodstock, pre-disco, pre-MTV. So it was a point when music still had truckloads of integrity," Hudson tells FRONTLINE. "Somebody was getting ready to exploit rock and roll."

Hudson tells his story of how the business changed him and how The Hudson Brothers ended up becoming TV stars as the summer replacement for the Sonny and Cher Comedy Hour.

In the early 1980s, MTV fueled a further explosion of interest and seemed to broaden the appeal of rock music.

"I thank God for the music video channels because they're another way of getting people to hear music," says music industry veteran Danny Goldberg, now president of Artemis records.

But surprisingly, there are those who now argue MTV was a negative force.

"What it did really is make the business a one trick pony--and everything became about the three minutes, the single, the hit single," entertainment attorney Michael Guido tells FRONTLINE. "I think the album died with MTV. The culture in the record companies in the last twenty years has been to reward artists for three minutes of music, not for forty minutes of music."

Some critics fear that the industry's need for quick hits has made it difficult for more adventurous artists to offer the unique sounds and challenging themes that have long been the hallmark of the best album artists.

FRONTLINE also examines the effect of consolidation of ownership on the music industry. "What you had were these people who had been tremendous entrepreneurs...bought up by a multi-conglomerate," Billboard's Newman says. "And it just changes the complexion. The whole way you're having to make decisions is based on different models."

Michael "Blue" Williams, manager of the Grammy Award-winning OutKast, agrees. "We're run by corporations now," he says. "We have accountants running two of four majors now, and they don't get it. It's a numbers game. And music has always been a feelings game."

The consolidation of the radio industry also negatively impacted the recording industry, observers say.

"Thousands of radio stations changed hands, and companies that wanted to really get on radio were able to pull up some enormous multibillion dollar mergers," Los Angeles Times reporter Jeff Leeds tells FRONTLINE. "Suddenly a company that once owned three dozen stations could suddenly own a thousand."

With programming decisions centralized at the corporate level, most stations follow a mandated play list. In some cases, it's just fourteen songs per week--leaving little airtime for the introduction of new artists.

FRONTLINE profiles Mark Hudson's daughter singer/songwriter Sarah Hudson as she prepares to release her first album at a time when the music industry is struggling. "For any new artist, the odds are almost insurmountable. I think if they knew the odds, they would never get in the first place. You know, the vast, vast majority of records go absolutely nowhere," Newman says.

Vying with Hudson for a place on the Billboard charts is Velvet Revolver, a "super band" backed by RCA Records, a label that is betting heavily on the group. FRONTLINE follows the marketing of the band as its members struggle to return to the spotlight. Velvet Revolver's manager says success takes more than an expensive video and a marketing campaign. "It's still all about the kids. If the kids want to request it, it gets played more and more. The more it gets played, the more people buy. The more people buy, the more records they sell. The more records they sell, shazam, you're a rock star," David Codikow says.



"The Way the Music Died" is a FRONTLINE co-production with the Kirk Documentary Group. The producer, writer, and director is Michael Kirk.

FRONTLINE is produced by WGBH Boston and is broadcast nationwide on PBS.

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers. Additional support is provided by U.S. News & World Report.

FRONTLINE is closed-captioned for deaf and hard-of-hearing viewers.

FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.

The executive producer for FRONTLINE is David Fanning.

you should be able to view it online tomorrow. sounds like a good show.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
MTV did it. Cuz now you can't be ugly and get a record deal.
True, it's generally accepted that MTV killed Christopher Cross' career (though not too many cried).

I think the death throes of music began in the early 80s, not because of MTV, but because of the end of album rock airplay on radio stations, and the beginning of legal "independent distributor" payola.

IMO, two forces have been working on the music industry. One is an almost irrational fear of piracy (why they stopped playing albums on the radio and why DJ's talk during the first few seconds of every song) to the point where the record companies would prevent prospective buyers from listening before they could buy, and the other is the corporate fear of anything new or creative.
So what happens is that a music buyer, unable to hear more than 1 or 2 hits off an album (if that), would go to a music store and buy hoping that the album as a whole didn't suck, only to find out that it did.
I think the biggest problem that the music industry has though, is that there is very little actual love for music left in it. Go back to the great music of the 60s and 70s. Those artists loved music. You can "see" the smile on their faces with every note. Now throw on some modern pop. Can't you hear the difference?
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Well the Music industry always depended on the Youth to have creative tastes. Today they are for the most part just a bumch of nut shaving Metrosexual Clones who'll buy what ever they are told is good whether it is true or not
 

pulse8

Lifer
May 3, 2000
20,860
1
81
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Well the Music industry always depended on the Youth to have creative tastes. Today they are for the most part just a bumch of nut shaving Metrosexual Clones who'll buy what ever they are told is good whether it is true or not

Which makes the music industry their own worst enemy because they took part in the creation of these people.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Well the Music industry always depended on the Youth to have creative tastes. Today they are for the most part just a bumch of nut shaving Metrosexual Clones who'll buy what ever they are told is good whether it is true or not

Which makes the music industry their own worst enemy because they took part in the creation of these people.

Yep!
 

lancestorm

Platinum Member
Oct 7, 2003
2,074
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Well the Music industry always depended on the Youth to have creative tastes. Today they are for the most part just a bumch of nut shaving Metrosexual Clones who'll buy what ever they are told is good whether it is true or not

Nut shaving? I thought we had enough of that talk earlier this morning...
 

IndieSnob

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2001
1,340
0
0
My two cents on the whole decline in the music industry is this:

#1: They are still trying to rely on a whole album selling due to the popularity of the one 'hit single' on the album. Well if you wrap a bunch of crap filler around the one hit song, and someone has to pay $18.99 at their favorite crap music mega mart, or pay $6.99 for an EP with the single, or just the single, then of course people are going to download that one song. They need to find real musicians that can make a full album that's worth anything.

#2: Too many radio stations are now owned by huge conglomerates like Clear Channel and the like. These radio stations only serve on purpouse: to be given money by large corporate labels to play the newest hit single of (insert crap band name here) and play it three times every hour. DJ's are no longer able to make their own paylists, so instead of maybe hearing something new they've come across, we're forced to listen to the same things over again, so that the big wigs can sit on big fat cash cows.

#3: Record labels are pandering to people like MTV because they know alot of the youth of today have short attention spans, so why not just give them a bunch of songs about nothing, so that they can sit and watch their favorite little video, and not think anything more about it. MTV really doesn't matter much anymore because their more intrested in doing a bunch of stupid shows, and focusing on two hours of music a day. It's a real shame M2 has come to this also. When M2 first started it was all videos, and 75% of their playlists was great independent stuff, or good major label stuff that wasn't just played the last hour.

#4: I'm sorry I have to go here, but people plain don't have any music taste now adays, because they grew up listening to garbage, and will continue to listen to garbage. They can't understand the difference between genres and sub genres, and instead they want the limp bizkit song because he says 'fvck' alot and tells you to 'break stuff'. I think if people gave at least a 50% chance on other stuff, they might find something more intresting to them, something that's an art form, not just a quick 3 minute self gratifying song.

I guess it's different for me, because I grew up with a Father who was very enriched in music. Granted he listened to some awful stuff, but there's alot of stuff he liked that I got into, and in turn readied my ear for music I'd hear later in life so I'd have an open mind about it. He played alot classical rock, but it was the listening of Frank Zappa or Captian Beefhear that opened my mind to serious musicianship, people that could play open tunings, construct a twelve minute song that actually went somewhere, and had some balls. That kind of stuff really led me into liking alot of free form jazz, post-punk, post-rock, and really great indie rock that grows on what the people back then were doing.

I'm excited to see their take on this tonight, should be intresting!
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: IndieSnob
My two cents on the whole decline in the music industry is this:

#1: They are still trying to rely on a whole album selling due to the popularity of the one 'hit single' on the album. Well if you wrap a bunch of crap filler around the one hit song, and someone has to pay $18.99 at their favorite crap music mega mart, or pay $6.99 for an EP with the single, or just the single, then of course people are going to download that one song. They need to find real musicians that can make a full album that's worth anything.

#2: Too many radio stations are now owned by huge conglomerates like Clear Channel and the like. These radio stations only serve on purpouse: to be given money by large corporate labels to play the newest hit single of (insert crap band name here) and play it three times every hour. DJ's are no longer able to make their own paylists, so instead of maybe hearing something new they've come across, we're forced to listen to the same things over again, so that the big wigs can sit on big fat cash cows.

#3: Record labels are pandering to people like MTV because they know alot of the youth of today have short attention spans, so why not just give them a bunch of songs about nothing, so that they can sit and watch their favorite little video, and not think anything more about it. MTV really doesn't matter much anymore because their more intrested in doing a bunch of stupid shows, and focusing on two hours of music a day. It's a real shame M2 has come to this also. When M2 first started it was all videos, and 75% of their playlists was great independent stuff, or good major label stuff that wasn't just played the last hour.

#4: I'm sorry I have to go here, but people plain don't have any music taste now adays, because they grew up listening to garbage, and will continue to listen to garbage. They can't understand the difference between genres and sub genres, and instead they want the limp bizkit song because he says 'fvck' alot and tells you to 'break stuff'. I think if people gave at least a 50% chance on other stuff, they might find something more intresting to them, something that's an art form, not just a quick 3 minute self gratifying song.

I guess it's different for me, because I grew up with a Father who was very enriched in music. Granted he listened to some awful stuff, but there's alot of stuff he liked that I got into, and in turn readied my ear for music I'd hear later in life so I'd have an open mind about it. He played alot classical rock, but it was the listening of Frank Zappa or Captian Beefhear that opened my mind to serious musicianship, people that could play open tunings, construct a twelve minute song that actually went somewhere, and had some balls. That kind of stuff really led me into liking alot of free form jazz, post-punk, post-rock, and really great indie rock that grows on what the people back then were doing.

I'm excited to see their take on this tonight, should be intresting!
Zappa was cool but I could never get into Captain Beerfart
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
indiesnob, my dad is/was a huge zappa/beefheart fan, too. and i agree with everything you say, so maybe that did have something to do with it. :)
 

PanzerIV

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2002
6,875
1
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Well the Music industry always depended on the Youth to have creative tastes. Today they are for the most part just a bumch of nut shaving Metrosexual Clones who'll buy what ever they are told is good whether it is true or not

LMAO. :p So, so true. They hung themselves and I love it.

F^ck todays music industry. I hope they decline even more. I have bought just one CD in the last several years and that was for my daughter. In the meantime I am going to keep listening to my collections from yesteryear like CCR, Chuck Berry, Glenn Miller and many, many more.
 

DAM

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2000
6,102
1
76
I for one do not blame the music industry they are just worried about their bottom line. They have found a formula just like during the Tin Pan Alley days and they continue to use it. The formula works and people are buying. The music needs more stones, muddy waters, chuck berry, elvis, etc, however even during their times there was always "music for the masses". It sells, its pays, and you don't have to like it.


dam()
 

IndieSnob

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2001
1,340
0
0
Zappa was cool but I could never get into Captain Beerfart

Heh, I'm no where as near a huge fan of Beefheart as I am Frank Zappa myself. I do like a few of his albums better than the others, as also some other singles of his. I think it's more of I really think he did alot for the rock/blues genre than most white people did. Instead of speeding it up and trashing it (ala Eric Clapton and their ilk) he actually built alot into it also. Listening to songs such as 'Safe As Milk' it's amazing what he does with the genre.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Well the Music industry always depended on the Youth to have creative tastes. Today they are for the most part just a bumch of nut shaving Metrosexual Clones who'll buy what ever they are told is good whether it is true or not
As much as you hate it I think in the same way as you for a lot of issues, and I agree with that.

The industry is giving people what they want. Musical feces.
 
Jan 8, 2003
593
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Well the Music industry always depended on the Youth to have creative tastes. Today they are for the most part just a bumch of nut shaving Metrosexual Clones who'll buy what ever they are told is good whether it is true or not

In your quest to insult today's youth you wrote something that is not very smart, is illogical and simply does not compute.

If music industry had indeed succeeded in creating legions of drones who buy whatever they are told, the industry would not have declining sales now, would they?
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
It's because the music industry quit producing music years ago; now it all seems to be made up of about 2 or 3 different flavors of noise as they frantically try to sustain record sales. The industry has been stagnant and it is a direct result of what these large corporations have done in pursuit of cookie-cutter music which then gets airplay by cookie-cutter radio stations. There has been no new creative effort that has been allowed to flourish.

Modern music and its boom started in the 50s and grew of its own accord. The 60s saw rock and roll mature and the seeds of future rock genres were sown. The 70s had a great diversity of rock and roll and then the disco boom. The 80s were punk rock, glitter bands, new wave, and ballad rock. The 90s brought in grunge, a surge in pop rock, and rap. All of these movements in music brought millions of new listeners and the record sales to go with them. What have we had since the late 90s? The answer is nothing. The music industry, as it consolidated and moved producing to the boardroom, has been stuck with its wheels spinning and it doesn't look likely to get unstuck anytime soon as they continue to stifle creativity.
 

pulse8

Lifer
May 3, 2000
20,860
1
81
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Well the Music industry always depended on the Youth to have creative tastes. Today they are for the most part just a bumch of nut shaving Metrosexual Clones who'll buy what ever they are told is good whether it is true or not

In your quest to insult today's youth you wrote something that is not very smart, is illogical and simply does not compute.

If music industry had indeed succeeded in creating legions of drones who buy whatever they are told, the industry would not have declining sales now, would they?

The reason they still have sales it all is because they have successfully made these "drones."
 

IndieSnob

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2001
1,340
0
0
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Well the Music industry always depended on the Youth to have creative tastes. Today they are for the most part just a bumch of nut shaving Metrosexual Clones who'll buy what ever they are told is good whether it is true or not

In your quest to insult today's youth you wrote something that is not very smart, is illogical and simply does not compute.

If music industry had indeed succeeded in creating legions of drones who buy whatever they are told, the industry would not have declining sales now, would they?

I think you're missing the point. They have declining sales due to their pricing schemes and their failure to make one full album that's worth a damn. Add that with P2P technologies and there in lies the problem. When my parents were kids, they could pick up a 45 or a 7 inch for 50 cents.
 

chrisms

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2003
6,615
0
0
Thank you for posting this. I'm really interested to see the story, as well as Velvet Revolver.