[Tom's Hardware] Intel Pentium G4620 and G4560 Review - Now with HT

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,570
10,202
126
The only glaring thing I can see from those benchmarks, is that they ran the G3258 at STOCK. Might as well have used a G3250 instead. I wish they would have included benchmark results with the G3258 @ 4.0, and again at 4.4+ (as high as they could go).

I have a feeling, that other than gaming frametimes, the G3258 would have fared pretty well at 4.4 at the application benchmarks.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,754
599
126
Not really seeing a compelling reason to buy the g4620 over the g4560 (these names though, really?)
 

nathanddrews

Graphics Cards, CPU Moderator
Aug 9, 2016
965
534
136
www.youtube.com
Yeah, the comments section complains about the OC issue as well. That said, the MT capabilities of the new chips plus the video decode/encode features I think makes it a much better buy. Any idea if any motherboards still offer the non-K OC capabilities (SKY OC BIOS equivalent)?
 

Magic Hate Ball

Senior member
Feb 2, 2017
290
250
96
The only glaring thing I can see from those benchmarks, is that they ran the G3258 at STOCK. Might as well have used a G3250 instead. I wish they would have included benchmark results with the G3258 @ 4.0, and again at 4.4+ (as high as they could go).

I have a feeling, that other than gaming frametimes, the G3258 would have fared pretty well at 4.4 at the application benchmarks.

https://youtu.be/Cyf7OKZNq0M

Here's your answer for that. In a title like BF1, an OC'd G3258 eats it hard.