Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Originally posted by: tami
29 i think.
You are correct!![]()
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Originally posted by: tami
29 i think.
You are correct!![]()
That's it, this "old" guy is gonna kick your ass.![]()
That's new to me.Originally posted by: SouthPaW1227
I'm tellin' you it's 29. No one would consider themself "young" at 39. The only possible answer here is 29, as having a "2" as the 1st digit still equals "young", but "30" is old.
Originally posted by: DearQT
That's new to me.Originally posted by: SouthPaW1227
I'm tellin' you it's 29. No one would consider themself "young" at 39. The only possible answer here is 29, as having a "2" as the 1st digit still equals "young", but "30" is old.I was thinking 65 or something. LOL!
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Originally posted by: DearQT
That's new to me.Originally posted by: SouthPaW1227
I'm tellin' you it's 29. No one would consider themself "young" at 39. The only possible answer here is 29, as having a "2" as the 1st digit still equals "young", but "30" is old.I was thinking 65 or something. LOL!
well, to be honest, that is the same logic I used... I am not sure, but when your age starts with a "3" I think you start considering 4am early instead of late.![]()
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Originally posted by: tami
29 i think.
You are correct!![]()
That's it, this "old" guy is gonna kick your ass.![]()
bring your bike!
Originally posted by: JetsFanatic
29 aint old
