- Oct 14, 2005
- 10,053
- 44
- 91
I've done a significant amount of moving in the last 6 years of my life. I moved from North Jersey to South Jersey for College, then moved back to North Jersey after College, then moved to Boston in August.
I find myself wondering where my life will/should take me next. Some areas of the country, such as San Francisco, Portland, Seattle, Boulder, Nashville, Chicago, and Austin, interest me a lot! I wonder how many of those cities are "really all the same", which ones I should avoid, and which ones I should perhaps live in for a while. I also consider possibly heading to the middle of no where in the smack dab center of Iowa and spending some time living in the middle of no where and enjoying the stars, scenery, and people.
But then, I question what is more important: bouncing around from place to place, experiencing it all, or staying in the relatively same area, making a few solid friends, and just enjoying that area for what its worth, traveling to the other areas on extended vacations, for instance.
They say to get these traveling things done young, but 5 people I work with have "traveled the country" since they were 22, as a group. Yes, they've lived EVERYWHERE, and have held 5-6 different jobs EVERYWHERE, but they also are anywhere between 30 and 38, and aren't married yet.... to me, that says a lot. I don't think they've stayed in one place long enough to meet people.
So I ask you ATOT: Just out of curiosity, and those who have traveled, or have wanted to travel in the past/future, what is more important?
Thanks!
Cliffs:
See poll
I find myself wondering where my life will/should take me next. Some areas of the country, such as San Francisco, Portland, Seattle, Boulder, Nashville, Chicago, and Austin, interest me a lot! I wonder how many of those cities are "really all the same", which ones I should avoid, and which ones I should perhaps live in for a while. I also consider possibly heading to the middle of no where in the smack dab center of Iowa and spending some time living in the middle of no where and enjoying the stars, scenery, and people.
But then, I question what is more important: bouncing around from place to place, experiencing it all, or staying in the relatively same area, making a few solid friends, and just enjoying that area for what its worth, traveling to the other areas on extended vacations, for instance.
They say to get these traveling things done young, but 5 people I work with have "traveled the country" since they were 22, as a group. Yes, they've lived EVERYWHERE, and have held 5-6 different jobs EVERYWHERE, but they also are anywhere between 30 and 38, and aren't married yet.... to me, that says a lot. I don't think they've stayed in one place long enough to meet people.
So I ask you ATOT: Just out of curiosity, and those who have traveled, or have wanted to travel in the past/future, what is more important?
Thanks!
Cliffs:
See poll