More like thousands if not tens of thousands across the US and world, but sure, keep on dreaming. When something brings up 1,000,000+ hits in a search engine, and isn't anything outside of itself (ie PNAC doesn't mean anything but PNAC), you've got a good indication that it's considered of MAJOR importance.
History will most likely view it as the creation of the neocon's, who eventually will probably become their own party rather than continuing to pollute the republican. I firmly expect them to play a major role in continuing world affairs.
fallout man
Golden Member
- Nov 20, 2007
- 1,787
- 0
- 0
Oh dear. Little have you learned about how screaming talking-points and Rovian political slurs does very little to recruit voters or sympathisers in a community which is literally... sitting one click away from Google.
Pabster, darling. You are like the fungus which seems to pop up between my pinky and ring toe every several weeks, despite treatment. Just fucking stop already. Please.
Huge breasts are about more than one thing...big chickens, females, implants, any one of 3 billion people, etc. PNAC is just about PNAC...a very small group of individuals with AMAZING power and influence.
lol so he set off to research "PNAC" but searches "big breasts" instead? :laugh:
No wonder he doesn't read. Five second attention span :laugh:
Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 33,428
- 7,489
- 136
Well, least I finally learn what the meaning of the term is. I admit I?ve been too lazy to goggle it when someone froths at the mouth and the abbreviation is used.
If they wanted to defend the homeland, they?d not want us to be pre-occupied with foreign wars while illegals invade this nation by the millions, and Muslims run free to convert further followers to the bloodshed and imposition of Sharia.
I strayed off topic, the question is regarding staff members. That sort of depends on how many politically active/savvy Republicans have become members. Depends on how likely it merely happened as opposed to if they were selected for that reason, and for what position they hold in the campaign. If it?s some regional twat that the candidate has never and will never meet, I couldn?t care less.
Although the concept of such an ideology being prevalent among Republicans is nonetheless disturbing We need a campaign for further foreign wars like we need another hole in the head.
*edit
I get the impression now you?re referring to actual positions in the administration. I kept thinking campaign staff.
For this I?ll stand by my earlier analysis that the ideology is disturbing, as if to distract us while bad things occur at home. I?m less concerned about relations to a particular group though than I am about a person?s actual ideology.
If for example, a President and their staff were more interested in Iran than securing our border and pursuing the radicals already here, I?d have to oppose them.
If they wanted to defend the homeland, they?d not want us to be pre-occupied with foreign wars while illegals invade this nation by the millions, and Muslims run free to convert further followers to the bloodshed and imposition of Sharia.
I strayed off topic, the question is regarding staff members. That sort of depends on how many politically active/savvy Republicans have become members. Depends on how likely it merely happened as opposed to if they were selected for that reason, and for what position they hold in the campaign. If it?s some regional twat that the candidate has never and will never meet, I couldn?t care less.
Although the concept of such an ideology being prevalent among Republicans is nonetheless disturbing We need a campaign for further foreign wars like we need another hole in the head.
*edit
I get the impression now you?re referring to actual positions in the administration. I kept thinking campaign staff.
For this I?ll stand by my earlier analysis that the ideology is disturbing, as if to distract us while bad things occur at home. I?m less concerned about relations to a particular group though than I am about a person?s actual ideology.
If for example, a President and their staff were more interested in Iran than securing our border and pursuing the radicals already here, I?d have to oppose them.
JD50
Lifer
- Sep 4, 2005
- 11,631
- 2,016
- 126
I think you are not interpreting the bold correctly. I don't think there is anything wrong with having a PLAN to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars". It has happened before(WWII), and will probably happen again. I am not saying that I agree with the PNAC, I'm just pointing out that there are certain parts that aren't all bad.
Well I don't plan on voting Republican (it's up in the air) but having PNAC members on board would lose my vote. Jingoism has cost us enough as it is.
CADsortaGUY
Lifer
And I too think the goals of the socialist left might at a stretch be laudable but the ineptness of the implementaion is what is damaging. That, and their total blindness to any reality based feedback as their programs crash down around them.
Boy this is fun. :roll: Care to continue?
CADsortaGUY
Lifer
CADsortaGUY
Lifer
So then maybe you shouldn't be painting with such a broad brush or state such narrow minded generalizations....
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 9K
-
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 7K
-
Facebook
Twitter