So I'm looking at tires for my Mazda3 and quite frankly, tirerack seems to be questionable at best. I think there is a fundamental flaw with a reviewing system when all the reviewed products perform the same functionally and the delta is only evident when you compare different products.
A $200 pirelli tire is rated nearly the same as a $90 Khumo which is rated the same as a $60 Sumisutrero tire. how is this possible?
I like reading the 'lowest rated' reviews to see what people complain about, and nearly always it's a soft sidewall. Great.
I wish they took a hint from amazon and pulled something along the lines of "statistically improbable phrases" to allow you to at-a-glance determine what the most common complaints about certain tires are, rather than reading through hundreds of reviews. For example, the Pirellis have low rating for excessive treadwear but the Kuhmos and general tire had been critisiced for soft sidewalls. OK. So why don't they offer some kind of comparison?
But then again, 205/50/R17 is an akward size.
A $200 pirelli tire is rated nearly the same as a $90 Khumo which is rated the same as a $60 Sumisutrero tire. how is this possible?
I like reading the 'lowest rated' reviews to see what people complain about, and nearly always it's a soft sidewall. Great.
I wish they took a hint from amazon and pulled something along the lines of "statistically improbable phrases" to allow you to at-a-glance determine what the most common complaints about certain tires are, rather than reading through hundreds of reviews. For example, the Pirellis have low rating for excessive treadwear but the Kuhmos and general tire had been critisiced for soft sidewalls. OK. So why don't they offer some kind of comparison?
But then again, 205/50/R17 is an akward size.