Tired of my SLI setup and it inability to Alt-Tab out of games

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,071
885
126
I currently have 2 eVga 7800 GT CO cards in my system. They run great in single or SLI mode but I cannot upgrade the video drivers past FW 81.83 because I am using a ULI chipset and Nvidia blocked SLI for ULI in higher versions of FW. I need to Alt-tab out a lot while playing games and many of them just dont like that. Many time when I go back into the game its either a half screen or a half screen that work on the upper part but the bottom half is at the last pic of whatever game I played. So I am thinking about giving up on SLI and get a single card that runs about the same as 2 7800 GT cards (or better, if possible) I am not looking into the 8800 series as I am not going Vista for a while yet and figure I could sell the 2 7800 GT cards and come close to breaking even, plus I heard the 8800 cards are long and my case is very cramped as is. So, my question is, what single will give me simular performance as the 2 7800 GT cards? I saw This and would like to know if this card will give me identical performance? Thanks.

I also saw This one

BTW, the games I mostly play now are FEAR, BF 2142, Oblivion, GTA:san Andreas, NWN2.
 

vhx

Golden Member
Jul 19, 2006
1,151
0
0
Just a question, are you using split frame rendering mode or alternate frame? Do they make a difference in this case?
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,071
885
126
Originally posted by: vhx
Just a question, are you using split frame rendering mode or alternate frame?

Honestly, I dont know. I do not see that option with the SW version I am stuck at.
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,071
885
126
Originally posted by: vhx
Just a question, are you using split frame rendering mode or alternate frame? Do they make a difference in this case?

Found something like this. It was called (IIR) rendendering - SLI single or off or SLI-antialiasing. the latter seems to be more stable but I notice its slower in Oblivion so I just set it back to SLI Multi GPU. I want a single card solution that is as fast as my 2 7800 GT cards. Anyone know if the card I linked above are a good solution?
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,071
885
126
Originally posted by: bamacre
If you can wait, 320MB 8800 GTS.

Dont plan on going Vista and dont like buying first-gen HW. I'll check that out tho. Thanks.
 

rstrohkirch

Platinum Member
May 31, 2005
2,434
367
126
Originally posted by: Oyeve
Originally posted by: bamacre
If you can wait, 320MB 8800 GTS.

Dont plan on going Vista and dont like buying first-gen HW. I'll check that out tho. Thanks.

I'm not sure what Vista has to do with his recommendation

You asked for a $300 card and the card he suggested will probably be the fastest card in the $300 bracket when it comes out...be that it supports dx10 or not
 

SPARTAN VI

Senior member
Oct 13, 2005
803
0
76
Originally posted by: rstrohkirch
Originally posted by: Oyeve
Originally posted by: bamacre
If you can wait, 320MB 8800 GTS.

Dont plan on going Vista and dont like buying first-gen HW. I'll check that out tho. Thanks.

I'm not sure what Vista has to do with his recommendation

You asked for a $300 card and the card he suggested will probably be the fastest card in the $300 bracket when it comes out...be that it supports dx10 or not

He probably thinks that he needs Vista to use the 8800GTS.. which is only true for the DX10 aspect of the card.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
Originally posted by: bamacre
If you can wait, 320MB 8800 GTS.

Seconded (or thirded I guess). By all accounts it should be a smoking deal and you do not need Vista to run it.

If you can't wait, get a X1950XT.

KT

 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,071
885
126
Originally posted by: SPARTAN VI
Originally posted by: rstrohkirch
Originally posted by: Oyeve
Originally posted by: bamacre
If you can wait, 320MB 8800 GTS.

Dont plan on going Vista and dont like buying first-gen HW. I'll check that out tho. Thanks.

I'm not sure what Vista has to do with his recommendation

You asked for a $300 card and the card he suggested will probably be the fastest card in the $300 bracket when it comes out...be that it supports dx10 or not

He probably thinks that he needs Vista to use the 8800GTS.. which is only true for the DX10 aspect of the card.


No, I dont think I need Vista to get that card. In the first post my concern was the size of the 8800 series of cards, not vista. I only mentioned vista because I will not be going that route for some time. I guess I should have given more details.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
Originally posted by: Oyeve
No, I dont think I need Vista to get that card. In the first post my concern was the size of the 8800 series of cards, not vista. I only mentioned vista because I will not be going that route for some time. I guess I should have given more details.

I'm pretty sure the GTS is shorter than the GTX, so it may still work for you.
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,071
885
126
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Originally posted by: Oyeve
No, I dont think I need Vista to get that card. In the first post my concern was the size of the 8800 series of cards, not vista. I only mentioned vista because I will not be going that route for some time. I guess I should have given more details.

I'm pretty sure the GTS is shorter than the GTX, so it may still work for you.

Maybe, but I'm looking to spend 300 or less.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Originally posted by: Oyeve
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Originally posted by: Oyeve
No, I dont think I need Vista to get that card. In the first post my concern was the size of the 8800 series of cards, not vista. I only mentioned vista because I will not be going that route for some time. I guess I should have given more details.

I'm pretty sure the GTS is shorter than the GTX, so it may still work for you.

Maybe, but I'm looking to spend 300 or less.

It's probably going to run ~$280ish after a couple of weeks of it's release.