- Jun 14, 2001
- 2,595
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
So if some people (justifiably) greet troops with hugs and cheers while others (not just Saddam loyalists) greet troops with bullets . . . what does that mean? Bush has juxtaposed Saddam's regime to a US invasion . . . who wouldn't look better?!
Originally posted by: Ferocious
Who cares what she thinks???
(I'll never understand why conservatives are obsessed with what celebs have to say)
Originally posted by: BaDaBooM
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
So if some people (justifiably) greet troops with hugs and cheers while others (not just Saddam loyalists) greet troops with bullets . . . what does that mean? Bush has juxtaposed Saddam's regime to a US invasion . . . who wouldn't look better?!
Actually the large majority of these snipers that are not Saddam loyalists are turning out to be foreigners from other Arab nations. Funny, as I read your post I was watching more footage (new, at least I haven't seen it yet) of large groups of Iraqis celebrating and taking down more statues.
She hasn't got the guts.Time Yet for Janeane Garofalo's Apology?
I know. It's truly bizarre isn't it?Originally posted by: Ferocious
Who cares what she thinks???
(I'll never understand why conservatives are obsessed with what celebs have to say)
Originally posted by: railer
Baldwin is a coward? Why is that again? 'Cause he was opposed to the war? I must have missed something. I've always considered those who go with the flow to be the true cowards. That's just me....
Bush is probably as great a threat to world security as Hussein was, if only because of the amount of military power that's under his (Bush's) thumb. Saddam wacks out and what could he do? Kill a few thousand people sure, but that's about it. If God tells Bush to nuke the world, and he does it, you've got a pretty big problem. I don't see anything inherently "liberal" or "anti-american" in that statement at all. It's just simple logic. Putin certainly has the potential to be a huge threat to world security, for many of the same reasons that apply to Bush. I don't think that "god" speaks to Putin quite as frequently as he speaks to Bush tho...thankfully.
I think you missed the pointOriginally posted by: railer
Baldwin is a coward? Why is that again? 'Cause he was opposed to the war? I must have missed something. I've always considered those who go with the flow to be the true cowards. That's just me....
Bush is probably as great a threat to world security as Hussein was, if only because of the amount of military power that's under his (Bush's) thumb. Saddam wacks out and what could he do? Kill a few thousand people sure, but that's about it. If God tells Bush to nuke the world, and he does it, you've got a pretty big problem. I don't see anything inherently "liberal" or "anti-american" in that statement at all. It's just simple logic. Putin certainly has the potential to be a huge threat to world security, for many of the same reasons that apply to Bush. I don't think that "god" speaks to Putin quite as frequently as he speaks to Bush tho...thankfully.
Actually the large majority of these snipers that are not Saddam loyalists are turning out to be foreigners from other Arab nations. Funny, as I read your post I was watching more footage (new, at least I haven't seen it yet) of large groups of Iraqis celebrating and taking down more statues.
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Actually the large majority of these snipers that are not Saddam loyalists are turning out to be foreigners from other Arab nations. Funny, as I read your post I was watching more footage (new, at least I haven't seen it yet) of large groups of Iraqis celebrating and taking down more statues.
Removing despotic regimes usually produces such an outcome even if you dislike your "liberators". If we launched a cruise missile barrage against the settlements in the West Bank and Gaza I'm sure a large groups of Palestinians would be celebrating in the street. Be careful with the conclusions you draw from anecdote . . . the larger context often produces a much different picture.
Probably because these uneducated, idiot celebs get twice as much face time on camera to say whatever they think than conservatives do. Just because someone made a movie or sang a song that I liked doesn't mean I want to hear what they think about politics over and over and over like they're some expert.Originally posted by: Ferocious
Who cares what she thinks???
(I'll never understand why conservatives are obsessed with what celebs have to say)
Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Who cares what that unfunny lesbian thinks?
Just another disgruntled democrat with a microphone in her face.