• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Time to upgrade: Athlon 64?

absinthe

Senior member
Well, the time for my once-every-three-years upgrade is coming soon (around springtime), and I want to start researching now. I don't want to cut any corners as I have in the past.

For my last build, 'bout 2 and a half years ago, I switched to an AMD product for the first time, and I've been very happy with it. I currently run with an Athlon XP 1600 and my machine generally performs like a champ (very cool since I only paid $55 for the processor).

However, my new hobby is video encoding and editing. I encode MP4 (XviD) and/or MPEG as well as audio almost daily, so for perhaps the first time a no-holds-barred processor is truly warranted for me. Also, since these encoding jobs take a good bit of time, multitasking is very important for me.

So ... to the point: Now we have these 64-bit processors available. I'd just like to be started off with a relatively simple explanation of what exactly this means in practical terms. I ask this because as I read about the 64-bit CPUs, I see phrases like "limited driver availability." So, I'm wanting to know if I can run all the same things I always have with a 64-bit processor. Keep in mind, I use a LOT of open-source software. What's this about needing special drivers? Is that just for hardware devices?

As with most people, I'll want to put something together that will be somewhat upgradeable. To this day, I've never been able to just replace a processor; I've had to get a whole new mobo every time. But that's really a secondary concern. Right now, I just want to understand 64-bit processors and figure out if they're for me, and if not .... what is?

I plan on just buying a mobo, processor, and a 1 GIG stick of Crucial RAM (possibly adding more later). Everything else in my box is fairly up to date, though I might also consider an SATA hard drive.

Keeping in mind that I use lots of open-source software (probably 75-100 little freeware apps) and that I need good multitasking, is the AMD 64 for me?

Thanks!

-abs

 
Unless you're using a 64-bit OS with 64-bit software, the Athlon64 processors run in 32-bit mode. At that point, they're essentially a much faster version of an AthlonXP, with an integrated on-die memory controller and SSE2.
 
Thanks ... that helps. I've also just read in another forum that AMDs are really better for gaming, in general, whereas Pentiums are better for both: a) encoding, and b) multitasking (i.e. having lots of windows open at once). If that's the case, perhaps I should go back to Intel chips. I don't really do high-powered gaming.

-abs
 
I love my A64, but i have started to do some video encoding as well, & i finally see why people like Hyperthreading, as i pretty much have to stop using it while encoding.

I would likely say P4 since you don't game much & do lots of video/audio stuff, but if you don't plan on upgrading for another 3 yrs., that may be no good, since i'm assuming 64-bit software will have taken off by then, & you'll be watching from your 32-bit platform

So as with everything, there are pros & cons with both CPUs; it's up to you to decide which is more important to you.
 
Well, as I said, it'll probably be March of next year before I get around to actually making purchases ... so maybe things will evolve by then.

-abs
 
Back
Top