- Aug 21, 2007
- 12,001
- 571
- 126
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/385993/time-stop-isis-charles-krauthammer
Krauthammer gives Obama credit where its due here. I thought this was pretty even-handed.
If you'd like to read the rest, kindly visit the site via the link above.
I was pleased that Obama kept his word about assistance if Iraq got rid of Al-Maliki. I was pleased with the result of the airstrikes and the retaking of the dam.
I urge not necessarily a larger commitment of forces, but that our objective be overt: the eradication of the Islamic State.
Krauthammer gives Obama credit where its due here. I thought this was pretty even-handed.
Baghdad called President Obama’s bluff and he came through. He had refused to provide air support to Iraqi government forces until the Iraqis got rid of their divisive sectarian prime minister.
They did. He responded.
With the support of U.S. air strikes, Iraqi and Kurdish forces have retaken the Mosul dam. Previous strikes had relieved the siege of Mount Sinjar and helped the Kurds retake two strategic towns that had opened the road to a possible Islamic State assault on Irbil, the capital of Kurdistan.
In following through, Obama demonstrated three things: the effectiveness of even limited U.S. power, the vulnerability of the Islamic State, and, crucially, his own seriousness, however tentative.
The last of these is the most important. Obama had said that there was no American military solution to the conflict. This may be true, but there is a local military solution. And that solution requires U.S. air support.
It can work. The Islamic State is overstretched. It’s a thin force of perhaps 15,000 trying to control a territory four times the size of Israel. Its supply lines are not just extended but exposed and highly vulnerable to air power.
Stopping the Islamic State’s momentum creates a major shift in psychology. Guerrilla armies thrive on a sense of inevitability. The Islamic State has grown in size, demoralized its enemies, and attracted recruits from all over the world because it seemed unstoppable, a real caliphate in the making.
People follow the strong horse over the weak horse, taught Osama bin Laden. These jihadists came out of nowhere and shocked the world by capturing Mosul, Tikrit, and the approaches to Kurdistan, heretofore assumed to be impregnable.
Now that’s begun to be reversed.
Obama was slow to bring American power to bear. And slower still to arm the Kurds. But he was right to wait until Baghdad had gotten rid of Nouri al-Maliki, lest the U.S. serve as a Shiite air force. We don’t know how successful Haider al-Abadi will be in forming a more national government. But Obama has for now wisely taken advantage of the Abadi opening.
The problem is that the new policy has outgrown the rationale. Our reason for returning to Iraq, explained Obama, is twofold: preventing genocide and protecting U.S. personnel.
If you'd like to read the rest, kindly visit the site via the link above.
I was pleased that Obama kept his word about assistance if Iraq got rid of Al-Maliki. I was pleased with the result of the airstrikes and the retaking of the dam.
I urge not necessarily a larger commitment of forces, but that our objective be overt: the eradication of the Islamic State.
Last edited:
