Time magazine interviews the Delta Force commander who led U.S. troops against Al-Qaeda at Tora Bora.

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
What a Top Terror Tracker Learned About Osama bin Laden

TIME: When you hear a U.S. presidential candidate saying "I promise we'll kill Osama bin Laden," what runs through your mind?

Dalton Fury: What runs through my mind is that it doesn't really matter who is going to go in the White House next year. If there's no intelligence on where [bin Laden is] located, then you can have Mickey Mouse in the White House.

If they had good actual intelligence now, they would have hit him a Hellfire missile, or even potentially sent a special team in there. But it's just not as easy as saying, "When I get elected, I'll kill him," because if we knew where he was now, we would have already made the attempt.

Are we getting better intelligence now?

I think we're always improving. We're trying to build a better mousetrap, but you know, it's hard to fight [al-Qaeda] with conventional weaponry. The answer isn't always money. You can buy a thousand more Predator drones and put them over there and clog the airspace, but they're not stupid ? they know when the Predators are up there.

So yeah, we're going to make them fly higher and have more powerful cameras and all that stuff, but I think that because [al-Qaeda leaders] live in mud huts and they're barely washing and bathing themselves ... that we somehow treat them as if they are inferior human beings.

How aware were they of your abilities, the abilities of the Delta Force?

I'd be naive to say that they weren't aware of it. I think they're smart enough and have shown a propensity to understand how the Internet works and how to get around being discovered by using various means.

The view that exists in the U.S. is that bin Laden is living in a cave somewhere, that he's cut off from the rest of the world.

Bin Laden garners a lot of support from people because he has the ability and the willpower to live in austere conditions, to live like the average Afghani or the average Pashtun ? without a lot of creature comforts. It's hard for a Western mind to realize that bin Laden is perfectly comfortable with a couple of meals a day of flat bread and some rice, as long as he can read the Koran and put out his audio and videotapes when he sees fit.

It's hard to imagine anybody, any leader in the West, to have the ability to do that, but he's shown that he can certainly do that.

What have you learned about him, his personality or his lifestyle that surprises you?

My book talks about him surrounding himself with individuals of his blood type, which I thought was very interesting. If he's wounded, then he has a guy with the same blood who can give him a transfusion. But that's completely counter to the legend that bin Laden's bodyguards have been ordered to kill him if he is wounded in a battle. If that was true, in my personal opinion, he would have stayed in Tora Bora and not ran. That surprised me very much. I really thought he would stay and fight as he advertised.

The other thing that surprised me was that [during the fighting in Tora Bora] he actually told his women and children to arm themselves and come out of the caves and fight the Americans. For a man of bin Laden's stature, who puts so much credence in the Koran and the afterlife and paradise, it seemed like he reduced himself to an actual human being, with actual fears and concerns for his own health, his own survival. In his sermons and tapes, he appears above those concerns, yet here he was, asking the women and children to do the fighting for him.

When detectives track a serial killer for a long time, they can sometimes get in his head ? and they can anticipate his next move. Do you feel the same way about bin Laden?

I don't think we know that much about his personality, to tell you the truth. He's obviously been very evasive over the years, and you're not getting a lot of people walking in with information.

What is it that people in the U.S. still don't get about bin Laden that you think they ought to?

I think they don't get how powerful this Islamic religion is and how powerful the Koran can be to a very small percentage, a minute percentage, of the Muslim community ? people who will, in the name of bin Laden or in the name of jihad or like al-Qaeda ideology, strap on a suicide bomb or get into a bomb-laden vehicle, and blow up a hotel or a checkpoint ? all in the name of bin Laden.

I think that he has such enormous magnetism that you almost have to respect it. No American is going to strap a bomb to himself and go kill someone in the name of Barack Obama or John McCain ? that's not going to happen.

Many Americans think, Hey, come on, we're offering a reward of $25 million. We've been looking for this guy for seven years ? so come on, what's the big deal? How hard can it be? But when you actually get around those people [who shelter the al-Qaeda leaders], you see how honorable they are, how independent they are, how hospitable they are, all according to their religion. It's much different than communism, you know. We never faced that in the Cold War. This truly is a different enemy here.

What's next for you?

I have no idea. I'm a private citizen, and I think I'll just spend family time and watch the news and see when we finally grab bin Laden. I hope it's a violent death. I hope he doesn't die of old age or health reasons. Personally, I think he needs to die the same way that 3,000 individuals died on 9/11.

You don't want to see him being tried first?

I don't want to see him be tried, no. I don't think anybody does. I think it would be a circus. With Saddam Hussein, it was probably a good idea that he was tried because millions of [Iraqis] hated him ? he terrorized the majority of the country. No one in Afghanistan or Pakistan really hates bin Laden, so you don't have those millions of enemies that Saddam had.

Killing him, it might make him a martyr, that's O.K. I think [the terrorists will] soon forget about it. I think they'll lose their stomach for the fight when they see the mighty bin Laden was vulnerable and was finally taken out. I don't think they'll have an easy time replacing him. I know the other top tier [al-Qaeda leadership] can barely get along as it is, they all don't particularly like each other. I don't think there's anybody that can bring the following out like bin Laden can.

I'm very curious as to what he means when he says, "This truly is a different enemy here." I still equate the Islam extremism with the communist threat - fanatics willing to kill hundreds/thousands/millions including themselves for ideology. The Soviets had their honour as well.

Bin Laden sending women and children out to fight for him is a wonderful mental image, which shouldn't be much of a surprise to anyone. He and his cronies do, after all, concentrate mainly on killing unsuspecting non-combatants.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: yllus
What a Top Terror Tracker Learned About Osama bin Laden

I'm very curious as to what he means when he says, "This truly is a different enemy here." I still equate the Islam extremism with the communist threat - fanatics willing to kill hundreds/thousands/millions including themselves for ideology. The Soviets had their honour as well.

Bin Laden sending women and children out to fight for him is a wonderful mental image, which shouldn't be much of a surprise to anyone. He and his cronies do, after all, concentrate mainly on killing unsuspecting non-combatants.

You don't understand communists much - 'fanatics willing to kill millions including themselves for ideology' is not a good description of communists (do you want to argue that American are people who are fanatics willing to kill masses for ideology based on our having had the Civil War?)

And as for the comment on Al Queda - it may not be politically correct, but IMO one thing you can't attack Al Queda for is not having great courage generally, much more than needed by the typical US soldier who faces far less risk and suffering than Al Queda soldiers do, with vastly inferior resources, armor, organization, training, information, weaponry, comforts, medical care in case of injury, odds of getting hurt or killed.

You really should learn something about why terrorist groups target civilians when they do.

And while they often do, the one you pick on - apparently 9/11 - doesn't even fit the description. They targetted the strenghts of the US responsible for the policies in the Middle East in their view - the government (Congress that was not hit when Flight 93 was crashed), military (Pentagon) and economic power (WTC). The civilians were 'incidental' targets not the primary targets in the attacks, unlike in 'conventional' terrorism, aimed at 'terrorizing' a population.

What bothers me in the issue is when the real problems with bad forces in the Middle East are fought not just for 'battling evil', but for replacing it with a 'new evil'. It's so easy for people to self-righteously forget that Saddam was *backed* by the US for years, the backing being strongest at the same time his crimes were the strongest. Too often the battle is 'corrupted'. Are repressive regimes in Saudi Arabia and Egypt we closely ally with and supply vast military aid to so much better than the 'enemies' we kill?

It's pretty terrible when our own policies are bad enough that 'the enemy' includes a lot of innocent people defending their own lands legitimately. When we invaded Iraq, it was with a plan for installing our puppet, with plans for implementing radical, terrible, right-wing Milton Friedman economic policies, and a lot of maps of oil fields - a lot of which did not happen as planned with all the screwups.

Hopefully, Obama can do better at 'spreading demcoracy'. But do Americans have the stomach for a lot of aid for rebuilding Afghanistan, instead of just for war spending?

It's always amazing and appalling to see $100 in financial aid get violently opposed while $10 billion in war spending sails through.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Asking a Delta Force agent whether he thinks that Al Qaeda or Bin Laden is a threat is like asking the failing banks if they think the Bailout is needed.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Asking a Delta Force agent whether he thinks that Al Qaeda or Bin Laden is a threat is like asking the failing banks if they think the Bailout is needed.


I would like to know who doesnt think AQ is a threat, outside of a very few fringe liberals?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,885
55,132
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Asking a Delta Force agent whether he thinks that Al Qaeda or Bin Laden is a threat is like asking the failing banks if they think the Bailout is needed.

Well I think he proved pretty conclusively that he is a threat. Even if you don't consider him one now in his reduced state, I see little reason to believe that he wouldn't become one again if we let up on him. The only problem I have is his apparent preference for killing Bin Laden. That's BS. I understand that if we have the choice between killing him and not getting him at all, that I think most reasonable people would choose to kill him, but to make that the first goal and not the last is wrong.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Originally posted by: yllus
I'm very curious as to what he means when he says, "This truly is a different enemy here."

In our adventures overseas, the US can always find "corruptibles" among the enemy. People who will sell out their own for money, power, whatever. What he is saying is, this isn't the case in our search for OBL.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
The guy's name is "Dalton Fury"? That sounds like something out of a bad USA Network action tv show.
 

Ballatician

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,985
0
0
Did anyone watch his interview on 60 minutes?

The most confusing part of that whole interview is when he talks about being 2000m away from Bin Laden. His force came up with 2-3 separate plans of attack and each one was shot down by the commanders who instead told them to hold ground. The interviewer then asked, "How many times in your Delta Force experience have you had a plan of attack not approved by your superiors?" The answer was zero.

 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: Kadarin
The guy's name is "Dalton Fury"? That sounds like something out of a bad USA Network action tv show.

No kidding. The only way to top that would be for Dalton to pursue his PhD next. :laugh:
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: yllus
I'm very curious as to what he means when he says, "This truly is a different enemy here."

In our adventures overseas, the US can always find "corruptibles" among the enemy. People who will sell out their own for money, power, whatever. What he is saying is, this isn't the case in our search for OBL.

Ah, yeah, that makes more sense. It's pretty hard to "corrupt" people who voluntarily live in caves by offering them money. :p

Originally posted by: Kadarin
The guy's name is "Dalton Fury"? That sounds like something out of a bad USA Network action tv show.

Fury, who can't use his real name because of security concerns, is now a private citizen. He spoke with TIME world editor Bobby Ghosh on the phone from an undisclosed location.

Where did you come up with Dalton Fury? It's a great name.

Simple Google search: it wasn't taken. It's pretty far from my true name.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,743
6,318
126
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Asking a Delta Force agent whether he thinks that Al Qaeda or Bin Laden is a threat is like asking the failing banks if they think the Bailout is needed.


I would like to know who doesnt think AQ is a threat, outside of a very few fringe liberals?

Bush.