Time for an Upgrade!

jgbishop

Senior member
May 29, 2003
521
0
0
I'm planning on upgrading my machine in the near future, and I'd like some help. Here's the most important stuff of what I have currently:

Asus TUSL2-C Motherboard
Pentium III 1 GHz
512 MB Crucial PC133 SDRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 2 MX (Hercules 3D Prophet II MX)

I have gotten the upgrade bug once again and I am planning on going to the following kind of system:

Asus P4PE Motherboard
Pentium IV 2.5 GHz
512 MB Crucial PC2700 DDRAM
????

As you can see, I don't currently know what kind of video card I'd like to go to. I'm willing to spend on the order of up to $225 for a new video card, and I clearly want something better than the GeForce 2 MX that I currently have (BTW, that card has done a fine job over the past couple of years). I am mostly interested in 3D gaming (Max Payne, Jedi Knight 2, etc.), and I'd like to be able to run Half-Life 2, Thief III and Doom III as smoothly as possible when they get released. As far as 2D goes, I currently have a 19-inch monitor and run WinXP at 1280x1024. I would normally like to run 1600x1200, but my monitor won't support a decent refresh rate at that resolution (and the flicker at 60 Hz gets awfully annoying).

Anyway, I want the best bang for my buck. I've been reading a lot about graphics cards recently, but they have been changing so much in such a short period of time, that I've lost track of where different chipsets stand. So what is recommended for a gaming geek like myself? Any guidance that anyone can provide would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks,
 

McArra

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,295
0
0
I´ll take a Radeon 9500PRO or 9700 if I could.
I have a 9700PRO by Hercules and it's just great.
I'd forget about NVidia (I had a 4400Ti for 2 weeks before the Radeon) as it's image quality isn't as good as ATI's.
You won´t have any driver issues with ATI.
 

rogue1979

Diamond Member
Mar 14, 2001
3,062
0
0
Originally posted by: McArra
I´ll take a Radeon 9500PRO or 9700 if I could.
I have a 9700PRO by Hercules and it's just great.
I'd forget about NVidia (I had a 4400Ti for 2 weeks before the Radeon) as it's image quality isn't as good as ATI's.
You won´t have any driver issues with ATI.

I've had the 9500 Pro, 9700 and 9700 Pro. Now I am using a GF4 Ti4600. As far as image quality, I have to disagree. ATI still seemed (past tense) to have a slight advantage in 2D. As far as 3D at the same settings (doesn't include 1600 x 1200 at 6X AA which the 9500 Pro and GF4 Ti4600 struggle with) I thought Nvidia had the slight advantage. Fast forward to the 44.03 Detonator, Nvidia finally cleaned up the 2D to be every bit as good as ATI's. MY wife was using a Radeon 9000 just to benefit from the crispness of 2D text with ATI. After she saw the improvement with the 44.03 she immediately upgraded to a GF4 Ti4200 128MB. As far as driver issues that is the main reason I prefer Nvidia. While ATI drivers have improved immensely and work pretty good, they still do not have the compatibility of the Detonators. I thought the CAT 3.0 and 3.1 worked decent, 3.2 and 3.4 leave something to be desired.

 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
If you're willing to spend $X, buy Y ...

$50 - Cut back the rest and get a better budget ;)
$100 - geForce4 Ti4200
$150 - Radeon 9500
$200 - Radeon 9700

More than that on a videocard is just dumb. :p

- M4H
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,002
126
With that rig the minimum I'd consider is a Radeon 9500 Pro though I strongly recommend a Radeon 9700 Pro or better.
 

jgbishop

Senior member
May 29, 2003
521
0
0
Why not get an 865PE board only costs a little more than the 845PE?

What's the main difference in these two boards? I haven't had the chance (yet) to look at them ...