- Nov 14, 2000
- 4,823
- 6
- 81
i know a million people ask this question here in the forums when looking to upgrade their video card, so bare with me. ok, i don't need the absolute best video card on the market (GF4 Ti4600 and such), but at the same time i don't want anything less than above average when it comes to performance (GF4 MX series and the like). like most everyone else, i want good performance without having to spend over $300. infact, i would like to spend no more than $200 ($250 at the most if i aboslutely have to). ok, now here are the things i know (or at least think i do anyways...correct me if i'm wrong):
1) why get a GF4 MX when i can get a GF3 Ti that performs as good if not better, and for less $?
2) why not look into ATI since they have become just as competitive as nVidia in the GPU market?
3) why not get an ATI Radeon 8500 series and save anywhere from $20 - $50 instead of buying a GF4 Ti4400?
4) why not get an ATI Radeon 8500 series either for the same price as a GF4 Ti4200 or for as much as $60 less?
and now for the real questions:
1) i know about the existance of a Radeon 9000 Pro that competes w/ nVidia's GF4 MX. would it be wiser to go with a Radeon 8500 series over the 9000 Pro, just as some people would argue that the performance of a top-of-the-line GF3 will outperform a GF4 MX?
2) what are the exact differences between the Radeon 8500 , the 8500 LE, the PowerColor Radeon 8500 LE, and the AIW Radeon 8500 DV?
3) what are the exact differences between nVidia's GF4 Ti4200, 4400, and 4600 (not that the 4600 is an option for me, but i figured i'd ask since i am considering either the 4200 or the 4400)?
*by the way, i don't need any super special features that boost the price by $50 such as dual DVI support, or VIVO support. i'm won't need anything special for video capture and such. i dont need a card w/ LCD (flat panel) out. TV out would be nice...really nice in fact, but not if its going to bring the price above $250. i'm strictly in the market for a new card b/c i'm a gamer. i have a DVD-ROM, but i never use it since i have a DVD player and a TV in the same room. 2D is somewhat important, but i won't have any problems w/ that if i go with an ATI, and i can't imagine being disappointed w/ nVidia's 2D if i get a GF4 Ti. so that just gives everyone an idea of what i'm looking for in a video card...
i've been reading a review on the Radeon 9000 series and comparing its performance to the 8500 series, and also to the GF4 Ti4200 and 4400. it seems as though the 9000 series is to ATI what the GF4 MX series is to nVidia. needless to say, i'm focuing more on the Radeon 8500 series and the GF4 Ti4200 and 4400. i think that's all the questions i have for now...at least thats all i can think of at the moment. but i would really appreciate advice from anyone who knows their videos cards, or who just wants to share their experience with a card that i might be interested in. thanks...eric
1) why get a GF4 MX when i can get a GF3 Ti that performs as good if not better, and for less $?
2) why not look into ATI since they have become just as competitive as nVidia in the GPU market?
3) why not get an ATI Radeon 8500 series and save anywhere from $20 - $50 instead of buying a GF4 Ti4400?
4) why not get an ATI Radeon 8500 series either for the same price as a GF4 Ti4200 or for as much as $60 less?
and now for the real questions:
1) i know about the existance of a Radeon 9000 Pro that competes w/ nVidia's GF4 MX. would it be wiser to go with a Radeon 8500 series over the 9000 Pro, just as some people would argue that the performance of a top-of-the-line GF3 will outperform a GF4 MX?
2) what are the exact differences between the Radeon 8500 , the 8500 LE, the PowerColor Radeon 8500 LE, and the AIW Radeon 8500 DV?
3) what are the exact differences between nVidia's GF4 Ti4200, 4400, and 4600 (not that the 4600 is an option for me, but i figured i'd ask since i am considering either the 4200 or the 4400)?
*by the way, i don't need any super special features that boost the price by $50 such as dual DVI support, or VIVO support. i'm won't need anything special for video capture and such. i dont need a card w/ LCD (flat panel) out. TV out would be nice...really nice in fact, but not if its going to bring the price above $250. i'm strictly in the market for a new card b/c i'm a gamer. i have a DVD-ROM, but i never use it since i have a DVD player and a TV in the same room. 2D is somewhat important, but i won't have any problems w/ that if i go with an ATI, and i can't imagine being disappointed w/ nVidia's 2D if i get a GF4 Ti. so that just gives everyone an idea of what i'm looking for in a video card...
i've been reading a review on the Radeon 9000 series and comparing its performance to the 8500 series, and also to the GF4 Ti4200 and 4400. it seems as though the 9000 series is to ATI what the GF4 MX series is to nVidia. needless to say, i'm focuing more on the Radeon 8500 series and the GF4 Ti4200 and 4400. i think that's all the questions i have for now...at least thats all i can think of at the moment. but i would really appreciate advice from anyone who knows their videos cards, or who just wants to share their experience with a card that i might be interested in. thanks...eric