• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Tiger Woods 2005

bjc112

Lifer
I have played the game and think its fun. I typically like all the EA sports games somewhat..

However, according to gamespot it gets "9" which i definitely disagree with..

You have multiple games that have WAY better graphics and only score 9 or 10's...

FarCry, Doom 3, Splinter Cell, UK2k3, 2k4

Blah..

😛

I think it should be more in the 7 range.. Look at some of the screenshots.

Gamespot
 
Can be kind of hard to tell from just screenies... I don't know about '05, but it can't be ALL that different from '04... and I have '04 & think it could look a lot better. It's not that it looks terrible, really, but EA seems less than skilled at optimizing it for the PC, they seem more a console-oritented dev group. Far Cry is the best-looking game I've seen - and I have Doom3 and have played the ut2k4 demo, also seen a few Splinter Cell screens.
 
EA NHL 2005 only got a 7.9, where ESPN NHL2K5 got 9.1

EA Maden 2005 9.0, ESPN NFL2K5 9.2

all xbox..

I've prefered the ESPN/Sega sports games over the past few years myself....
 
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Its a sports game, what do you expect... btw WRONG FORUM :|

I wasnt expecting better graphics from EA... Im expecting a better damn review from Gamespot.

 
Originally posted by: Krk3561
This is how it works:

EA gives $$$$$

GameSpot reviews EA games

EA Games recieve A+++++

Doesn't really work that way, I worked for 3 reviewing websites over 2 years.
 
I think the graphics are OK... I am pretty sure I wouldn't give them a 9, but they are definately 7, maybe 8. I would like to see them on a better system (right now running a GF4 ti4600, my 9600 Pro just kicked the bucket), but there's no way in the world they can compare to Far Cry.

Jeff
 
Originally posted by: PTCvette
I think the graphics are OK... I am pretty sure I wouldn't give them a 9, but they are definately 7, maybe 8. I would like to see them on a better system (right now running a GF4 ti4600, my 9600 Pro just kicked the bucket), but there's no way in the world they can compare to Far Cry.

Jeff

Well that's what im talking it about.. Gamespot needs to stiffin them up.

No big deal though..

 
Originally posted by: Kalvin00
Cluttered websites make baby Jesus cry. :|

I'm glad I'm not the only one that gets headaches from looking at gamespot. I swear the site is tailored to 9 year olds.
 
Originally posted by: RyanSengara
Originally posted by: Krk3561
This is how it works:

EA gives $$$$$

GameSpot reviews EA games

EA Games recieve A+++++

Doesn't really work that way, I worked for 3 reviewing websites over 2 years.

Sounds Like you have trouble holding on to a job 😉
 
Back
Top