I do not believe this is possible but....
Within a SAN environment it is possible to setup a tiered storage so that files that need higher IO are on faster drives and those requiring lower, are on slower - yet the appearance to the OS is the same.
Is there a way within Server 2008 R2 to present the same sort of environment to users? I have a new file server that I am in the process of bringing online utilizing DFS.
The current file server is going to remain for archival/backup purposes. What I am wondering is if I can use DFS (or another method) to have files appear in a single folder to users but be spread across the two servers.
For example:
- File X.PDF is over 12 months old and is now residing on the Archive Server
- File AXA.PDF was created earlier today.
- A user goes into the 'Public' Share folder and sees both X.PDF and AXA.PDF - to the user both files appear to be in that location but to the DFS share it knows that X.PDF is located on the Archive server.
I know I can use DFS in this manner for an individual share - the question is if I can take it a step further to within a single share.
Within a SAN environment it is possible to setup a tiered storage so that files that need higher IO are on faster drives and those requiring lower, are on slower - yet the appearance to the OS is the same.
Is there a way within Server 2008 R2 to present the same sort of environment to users? I have a new file server that I am in the process of bringing online utilizing DFS.
The current file server is going to remain for archival/backup purposes. What I am wondering is if I can use DFS (or another method) to have files appear in a single folder to users but be spread across the two servers.
For example:
- File X.PDF is over 12 months old and is now residing on the Archive Server
- File AXA.PDF was created earlier today.
- A user goes into the 'Public' Share folder and sees both X.PDF and AXA.PDF - to the user both files appear to be in that location but to the DFS share it knows that X.PDF is located on the Archive server.
I know I can use DFS in this manner for an individual share - the question is if I can take it a step further to within a single share.