Tibet protests spread to Chinese provinces

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
Tibet protests spread to Chinese provinces

BEIJING - Violence in Tibet spilled over into neighboring provinces Sunday where Tibetan protesters defied a Chinese government crackdown. The Dalai Lama warned Tibet faced ?cultural genocide? and appealed to the world for help.

Protests against Chinese rule of Tibet were reported in neighboring Sichuan and Qinghai provinces and also in western Gansu province. All are home to sizable Tibetan populations.

?They?ve gone crazy,? said a police officer in Sichuan's Aba county, her voice trembling over the phone as the main government building there came under siege.



The officer, who declined to be named, said a crowd of Tibetans hurled gasoline bombs, burning down a police station and a market in the county?s main town, and set fire to two police cars and a fire truck.

The India-based Tibetan Center for Human Rights and Democracy said at least seven people have been shot dead in the county. There was no way of immediately confirming the claim.

One ethnic Tibetan resident in Aba said there were sounds like gunshots and there was widespread talk of 10 or more dead.

?Now it?s very tense. There are police going around everywhere, checking and looking over people for injuries,? said another resident of Aba, adding that many of the rioters were students of a Tibetan-language high school


If this was Israel doing something similar there would be an emergency meeting at the UN and major outcries throughout the world. Funny how relatively quiet the world is on this, hypocrisy at its finest or is this different?
 

Pepsei

Lifer
Dec 14, 2001
12,895
1
0
cultural genocide at its finest....

when are we going to stand up to the Chinese?
 

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
So this what the Lama expects from "peaceful protests" huh? Tibetans are part of China and have been since the Qing dynasty. Many Chinese are fascinated by their art and culture and the claims of cultural genocide are ridiculous. So what if Han Chinese want to move in and start entrepreneurial ventures inside Tibet? Wealth, jobs, and modernization from Han migrants have significantly improved the standard of living of Tibetans from the days of them defecating and urinating on the streets. So what do Tibetans do to Han who improve the Tibetan province? They beat, they terrorize, they kill and they destroy their property! Worse of all, they blame it on the people who improved their standard of living the most. It's like having Hawaiians viciously attack other Americans and blaming them for destroying their culture!

These separatists are just using the western media further their own agendas and are ultimately hurting themselves and their relations with the Chinese people. The Chinese military needs to quell this separatist rioting and protect the stability of China, that's what they're for.

Edit: This situation shows just how useless the Lama is and just how little control he has over his own people. The Tibetan people already have rejected this figurehead's words, and they have chosen violence.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,830
3
0
Originally posted by: Pepsei
cultural genocide at its finest....

when are we going to stand up to the Chinese?

When their trade with us is reduced to the level of Iran's. Or when Fidel becomes the president of China
 

babylon5

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2000
1,363
1
0
Originally posted by: sunzt
So this what the Lama expects from "peaceful protests" huh? Tibetans are part of China and have been since the Qing dynasty. Many Chinese are fascinated by their art and culture and the claims of cultural genocide are ridiculous. So what if Han Chinese want to move in and start entrepreneurial ventures inside Tibet? Wealth, jobs, and modernization from Han migrants have significantly improved the standard of living of Tibetans from the days of them defecating and urinating on the streets. So what do Tibetans do to Han who improve the Tibetan province? They beat, they terrorize, they kill and they destroy their property! Worse of all, they blame it on the people who improved their standard of living the most. It's like having Hawaiians viciously attack other Americans and blaming them for destroying their culture!

These separatists are just using the western media further their own agendas and are ultimately hurting themselves and their relations with the Chinese people. The Chinese military needs to quell this separatist rioting and protect the stability of China, that's what they're for.


Wow
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,830
3
0
Originally posted by: sunzt
So this what the Lama expects from "peaceful protests" huh? Tibetans are part of China and have been since the Qing dynasty. Many Chinese are fascinated by their art and culture and the claims of cultural genocide are ridiculous. So what if Han Chinese want to move in and start entrepreneurial ventures inside Tibet? Wealth, jobs, and modernization from Han migrants have significantly improved the standard of living of Tibetans from the days of them defecating and urinating on the streets. So what do Tibetans do to Han who improve the Tibetan province? They beat, they terrorize, they kill and they destroy their property! Worse of all, they blame it on the people who improved their standard of living the most. It's like having Hawaiians viciously attack other Americans and blaming them for destroying their culture!

These separatists are just using the western media further their own agendas and are ultimately hurting themselves and their relations with the Chinese people. The Chinese military needs to quell this separatist rioting and protect the stability of China, that's what they're for.

ALL fascists have their justifications. How does it feel being a fascist?
 

Pepsei

Lifer
Dec 14, 2001
12,895
1
0
Originally posted by: sunzt
So this what the Lama expects from "peaceful protests" huh? Tibetans are part of China and have been since the Qing dynasty. Many Chinese are fascinated by their art and culture and the claims of cultural genocide are ridiculous. So what if Han Chinese want to move in and start entrepreneurial ventures inside Tibet? Wealth, jobs, and modernization from Han migrants have significantly improved the standard of living of Tibetans from the days of them defecating and urinating on the streets. So what do Tibetans do to Han who improve the Tibetan province? They beat, they terrorize, they kill and they destroy their property! Worse of all, they blame it on the people who improved their standard of living the most. It's like having Hawaiians viciously attack other Americans and blaming them for destroying their culture!

These separatists are just using the western media further their own agendas and are ultimately hurting themselves and their relations with the Chinese people. The Chinese military needs to quell this separatist rioting and protect the stability of China, that's what they're for.

hey, mongolia has been part of china since yuan dynasty.... if it is so easy for chinese to give it up without a whimper... maybe tibet too...
 

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
Originally posted by: Pepsei
Originally posted by: sunzt
So this what the Lama expects from "peaceful protests" huh? Tibetans are part of China and have been since the Qing dynasty. Many Chinese are fascinated by their art and culture and the claims of cultural genocide are ridiculous. So what if Han Chinese want to move in and start entrepreneurial ventures inside Tibet? Wealth, jobs, and modernization from Han migrants have significantly improved the standard of living of Tibetans from the days of them defecating and urinating on the streets. So what do Tibetans do to Han who improve the Tibetan province? They beat, they terrorize, they kill and they destroy their property! Worse of all, they blame it on the people who improved their standard of living the most. It's like having Hawaiians viciously attack other Americans and blaming them for destroying their culture!

These separatists are just using the western media further their own agendas and are ultimately hurting themselves and their relations with the Chinese people. The Chinese military needs to quell this separatist rioting and protect the stability of China, that's what they're for.

hey, mongolia has been part of china since yuan dynasty.... if it is so easy for chinese to give it up without a whimper... maybe tibet too...

Mongolia is the exact reason Tibet hasn't been given up like others have wanted.

Edit: While Mongolia was part of China, the yuan were Mongols. During that period China lost its identity and it is not a period Chinese are proud of. Mongolia took advantage of the Civil war between the Communists and Nationalists and broke away before the communists had firm control. Tibet tried to break away during the 1950's while the Communist government was firmly in control. Even today Taiwan maps have Mongolia as part of China.
 

MadRat

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
11,910
238
106
China is too big for one government; it will consume itself long before it regains all of its lost territories. China's rulers are only fooling themselves that they can hold power over people that want nothing to do with their culture.

It's not too late to cancel the Olympics in protest.
 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
Originally posted by: sunzt
So this what the Lama expects from "peaceful protests" huh? Tibetans are part of China and have been since the Qing dynasty. Many Chinese are fascinated by their art and culture and the claims of cultural genocide are ridiculous. So what if Han Chinese want to move in and start entrepreneurial ventures inside Tibet? Wealth, jobs, and modernization from Han migrants have significantly improved the standard of living of Tibetans from the days of them defecating and urinating on the streets. So what do Tibetans do to Han who improve the Tibetan province? They beat, they terrorize, they kill and they destroy their property! Worse of all, they blame it on the people who improved their standard of living the most. It's like having Hawaiians viciously attack other Americans and blaming them for destroying their culture!

These separatists are just using the western media further their own agendas and are ultimately hurting themselves and their relations with the Chinese people. The Chinese military needs to quell this separatist rioting and protect the stability of China, that's what they're for.

Edit: This situation shows just how useless the Lama is and just how little control he has over his own people. The Tibetan people already have rejected this figurehead's words, and they have chosen violence.

That's BS. Tibet is a conquered territory, it has been and it is now. The only reason Tibet was under China throughout the history is because of the Chinese military force. They have every justification to want their identity and culture preserved. The only problem is the world is too chicken $hit to standup against China right now, and there is no way China would let such big piece of territory go independent just like that. China is made up of quite a few different minority races, and if Tibetan set a precedent, Manchurian, inner Mongolian, Qinghai province would all want their independence. So this is gonna be a tough situation and I am afraid many people is gonna lose their lives over this.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,438
7,503
136
Originally posted by: sunzt
Edit: This situation shows just how useless the Lama is and just how little control he has over his own people. The Tibetan people already have rejected this figurehead's words, and they have chosen violence.

An oppressed people who would rather die on their feet than live on their knees should remind Americans of, themselves. The right of self determination should be the right of all men.
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: Pepsei
Originally posted by: sunzt
So this what the Lama expects from "peaceful protests" huh? Tibetans are part of China and have been since the Qing dynasty. Many Chinese are fascinated by their art and culture and the claims of cultural genocide are ridiculous. So what if Han Chinese want to move in and start entrepreneurial ventures inside Tibet? Wealth, jobs, and modernization from Han migrants have significantly improved the standard of living of Tibetans from the days of them defecating and urinating on the streets. So what do Tibetans do to Han who improve the Tibetan province? They beat, they terrorize, they kill and they destroy their property! Worse of all, they blame it on the people who improved their standard of living the most. It's like having Hawaiians viciously attack other Americans and blaming them for destroying their culture!

These separatists are just using the western media further their own agendas and are ultimately hurting themselves and their relations with the Chinese people. The Chinese military needs to quell this separatist rioting and protect the stability of China, that's what they're for.

hey, mongolia has been part of china since yuan dynasty.... if it is so easy for chinese to give it up without a whimper... maybe tibet too...

"Being part of the empire" is a vastly different term than actually controlling it. In the case of Tibet, they had long period of autonomy. Interestingly enough - when Tibet was powerful they fvcked hard in Chinese affairs and vice versa...this is just a period where China is more powerful. The difference is that the Chinese are attempting to ensure this period of their dominance is permanent by literally making Tibetans a minority in their own capital.
Of course Mao was going to allow them to be a highly autonomous region much like the past, until some ethnic tibetans down in China (Although I suppose most places are "Downward" when compared to where Tibet is situated ;)) tried to ask for "help" from the motherland in resisting land reform. After that, the whole "hands off" policy was thrown out and you had massive PLA invasion.

Imo its really hard to ever have a clear answer with these things (politically where Tibet should be...I think things like torture of Tibetans clearly is sickening) should be. Tibet and XinJiang were never really "China" in the way China wants to make them appear to be...but the influence they exerted on the region (and vice versa) is undeniable. Whether or not these links translates into the right of direct rule by China, or Highly Autonomous region, or Indepedent nation with shared history and culture is the main question (Although I think its even less justified in the case of XinJiang as that is truly a "spoils" of the Manchu empire). But in order to make sure that these regions will be have the future the CCP wants, they flood them with tens of millions of Chinese.

No matter what though China is never going to leave those lands. They get too much water from Tibet, they get too much energy from the hydroelectic dams https://eee.uci.edu/08w/28200/hydromap2.jpg <000 notice how almost all of them are in Tibet. They won't leave.

Note to china: flooding in tens of millions of immigrants, claiming you are pouring tens of billions of dollars in development when most of those jobs go to the immigrant han...ruthelessly repressing ANY kind of dissent (Even that which isn't calling for outright independence) is realllllly going to piss off a local population. In fact it pushes them toward independence even more. There is a reason why they don't just willingly jump to assimilate - because from their eyes it looks like you are trying to eradicate them.
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: sunzt
Edit: This situation shows just how useless the Lama is and just how little control he has over his own people. The Tibetan people already have rejected this figurehead's words, and they have chosen violence.

An oppressed people who would rather die on their feet than live on their knees should remind Americans of, themselves. The right of self determination should be the right of all men.

HA how ironic coming from you!
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,438
7,503
136
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: sunzt
Edit: This situation shows just how useless the Lama is and just how little control he has over his own people. The Tibetan people already have rejected this figurehead's words, and they have chosen violence.

An oppressed people who would rather die on their feet than live on their knees should remind Americans of, themselves. The right of self determination should be the right of all men.

HA how ironic coming from you!

Quote me saying otherwise. Put up or shut up.
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: sunzt
Edit: This situation shows just how useless the Lama is and just how little control he has over his own people. The Tibetan people already have rejected this figurehead's words, and they have chosen violence.

An oppressed people who would rather die on their feet than live on their knees should remind Americans of, themselves. The right of self determination should be the right of all men.

HA how ironic coming from you!

Quote me saying otherwise. Put up or shut up.

Anything of or related to the Palestinians~

edit:

just in case you want quotes (I was going to get only one, and then i realized how easy this is)

http://forums.anandtech.com/me...id=52&threadid=2160476

Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Oppress people long enough and they will kill you.

Interesting. You argue as if the legitimacy of their warfare is beyond questioning.

Yet anytime our hostile enemy is to be killed on the battlefield, you cry foul that innocents are being slaughtered.

It is with an evil and vile hypocrisy that you look upon anyone fighting Muslim terrorists, and Israel is a prime example of that. You permit Muslims the legitimacy to kill Israelis, but not the Israelis the right to fight back.

I say let the strongest one win, and pray that the winner is our ally and not our sworn enemy.

Over here you don't care about the "oppressed people who would rather die on their feet than live on their knees" . In fact you simply say "let the strongest win, who cares"? That in itself, while can't EXACTLY be construed as anti Palestinian(although as a whole you love to condemn them), shows that your actual care towards oppressed people is weak.

http://forums.anandtech.com/me...erthread=y&STARTPAGE=1
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
We should sell Palestinian lands to Egypt. For free.
"The right of self determination should be the right of all men...unless its the Palestinians because we can sell their right to another country for free. Fuck what they think!"

Don't pretend to truly care about American Ideals if you will apply them selectively...because as you said - ideals like self determination are the rights of all people
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
Originally posted by: rchiu
That's BS. Tibet is a conquered territory, it has been and it is now. The only reason Tibet was under China throughout the history is because of the Chinese military force. They have every justification to want their identity and culture preserved. The only problem is the world is too chicken $hit to standup against China right now, and there is no way China would let such big piece of territory go independent just like that. China is made up of quite a few different minority races, and if Tibetan set a precedent, Manchurian, inner Mongolian, Qinghai province would all want their independence. So this is gonna be a tough situation and I am afraid many people is gonna lose their lives over this.

Every country has been conquered territory before. America conquered territory from many people and integrated it into American culture throughout its history. Like I said before, Chinese people are fascinated by the unique Tibetan culture and art. Han Chinese are not trying to remove Tibetan culture from Tibetans, they are just adding Chinese culture into the Tibetan landscape. Tibetans are afraid because now some areas have much more Han people than Tibetans and they are scared of "losing their culture". It's akin to how Native American culture got overwhelmed by Western culture except that the Chinese aren't committing mass genocide and are not trying to remove the culture from the Tibetan people.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,438
7,503
136
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
An oppressed people who would rather die on their feet than live on their knees should remind Americans of, themselves. The right of self determination should be the right of all men.

HA how ironic coming from you!

Quote me saying otherwise. Put up or shut up.

Anything of or related to the Palestinians~

Tibet is launching suicide bombers and rockets into other parts of China? No. Tibet is not at war to "push China into the sea", to destroy it. That enough to destroy your comparison?

My sympathies end when the ?oppressed? become the bloodthirsty aggressor looking to score kills on anything they can possibly find outside their own land. If you don?t want to make that distinction, and want to feel free to respond with any cruel and disproportionate violence then that I where I am proud to say I oppose you.
 

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
ALL fascists have their justifications. How does it feel being a fascist?

So when the confederates wanted to secede you would have let them huh? Americans would act the same way if any state in the Union (well almost any for some) decided to riot , attack Americans, and demand independence.
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: magomago

No matter what though China is never going to leave those lands. They get too much water from Tibet, they get too much energy from the hydroelectic dams <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="https://eee.uci.edu/08w/28200/hydromap2.jpg"><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="https://eee.uci.edu/08w/28200/hydromap2.jpg">https://eee.uci.edu/08w/28200/hydromap2.jpg</a></a> <000 notice how almost all of them are in Tibet. They won't leave.

Those dams look like they are East/Southeast of Tibet.

China

Well there is no point to build a damn at an elevation of thousands of feet. You want to maximize the drop in order to maximize your energy. For example, over 90% of the Yangtze River's drop occurs between Tibet area/ where the dams are. That is where the power is.

But that said - China wants to ensure those river courses do NOT change and stay put as they see fit. Or if it changes, its an order THEY made. And thus they have a vested interest in controlling that region to ensure the flow is what they want. Its much easier to control where your power comes from than have to broker deals with a neighboring country.
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: sunzt
Originally posted by: rchiu
That's BS. Tibet is a conquered territory, it has been and it is now. The only reason Tibet was under China throughout the history is because of the Chinese military force. They have every justification to want their identity and culture preserved. The only problem is the world is too chicken $hit to standup against China right now, and there is no way China would let such big piece of territory go independent just like that. China is made up of quite a few different minority races, and if Tibetan set a precedent, Manchurian, inner Mongolian, Qinghai province would all want their independence. So this is gonna be a tough situation and I am afraid many people is gonna lose their lives over this.

Every country has been conquered territory before. America conquered territory from many people and integrated it into American culture throughout its history. Like I said before, Chinese people are fascinated by the unique Tibetan culture and art. Han Chinese are not trying to remove Tibetan culture from Tibetans, they are just adding Chinese culture into the Tibetan landscape. Tibetans are afraid because now some areas have much more Han people than Tibetans and they are scared of "losing their culture". It's akin to how Native American culture got overwhelmed by Western culture except that the Chinese aren't committing mass genocide and are not trying to remove the culture from the Tibetan people.

A lot of what you describe is relative. Its hard to simply describe CCP policies as "adding chinese culture to a tibetan atmosphere"...

Tibet may have been conquered territory, but this type of "conquering" was something that was never historically experienced in Tibet. Again, its rule was largely "loose". Hell - the CCP even passed a law (the ATHEIST communists) that they control religious matters in Tibetan Buddhism
 

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
An oppressed people who would rather die on their feet than live on their knees should remind Americans of, themselves. The right of self determination should be the right of all men.

HA how ironic coming from you!

Quote me saying otherwise. Put up or shut up.

Anything of or related to the Palestinians~

Tibet is launching suicide bombers and rockets into other parts of China? No. Tibet is not at war to "push China into the sea", to destroy it. That enough to destroy your comparison?

My sympathies end when the ?oppressed? become the bloodthirsty aggressor looking to score kills on anything they can possibly find outside their own land. If you don?t want to make that distinction, and want to feel free to respond with any cruel and disproportionate violence then that I where I am proud to say I oppose you.

Once Tibetans cross the line and destroy property, beat, and kill innocent Han civilians then then it's no different from becoming "the bloodthirsty aggressor". The "oppressed" Tibetans are becoming "the bloodthirsty aggressor looking to score kills on anything they can possibly find outside their own land." Heck, they even don't' have their own land, so that part doesn't even apply.
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
An oppressed people who would rather die on their feet than live on their knees should remind Americans of, themselves. The right of self determination should be the right of all men.

HA how ironic coming from you!

Quote me saying otherwise. Put up or shut up.

Anything of or related to the Palestinians~

Tibet is launching suicide bombers and rockets into other parts of China? No. Tibet is not at war to "push China into the sea", to destroy it. That enough to destroy your comparison?

My sympathies end when the ?oppressed? become the bloodthirsty aggressor looking to score kills on anything they can possibly find outside their own land. If you don?t want to make that distinction, and want to feel free to respond with any cruel and disproportionate violence then that I where I am proud to say I oppose you.

So, in your eyes, the Palestinians are not an oppressed people at all?
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: sunzt
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
An oppressed people who would rather die on their feet than live on their knees should remind Americans of, themselves. The right of self determination should be the right of all men.

HA how ironic coming from you!

Quote me saying otherwise. Put up or shut up.

Anything of or related to the Palestinians~

Tibet is launching suicide bombers and rockets into other parts of China? No. Tibet is not at war to "push China into the sea", to destroy it. That enough to destroy your comparison?

My sympathies end when the ?oppressed? become the bloodthirsty aggressor looking to score kills on anything they can possibly find outside their own land. If you don?t want to make that distinction, and want to feel free to respond with any cruel and disproportionate violence then that I where I am proud to say I oppose you.

Once Tibetans cross the line and destroy property, beat, and kill innocent Han civilians then then it's no different from becoming "the bloodthirsty aggressor". The "oppressed" Tibetans are becoming "the bloodthirsty aggressor looking to score kills on anything they can possibly find outside their own land." Heck, they even don't' have their own land, so that part doesn't even apply.

Tibetans don't have their own land now? Am I understanding this right?
 

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
Originally posted by: magomago
Tibetans don't have their own land now? Am I understanding this right?

They have their own land. It's called China. It's been that way for a long time. They benefit from China's wealth and modernization and are free to move to anywhere else in China if they choose. Native Americans have their own land too, it's called America.

Edit: When I said "they didn't have their own land..." I meant independent land from China.